Skip to main content

International Perspective Pompidou University Hospital in France: A Component-Based Clinical Information and Electronic Health Record System

  • Chapter
Healthcare Information Management Systems

Part of the book series: Health Informatics Series ((HI))

  • 429 Accesses

Abstract

The creation of the Pompidou University Hospital [or the Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP), as it is known in French], in southwest Paris, from the merging of three aging facilities presented an opportunity to conceive and deploy COHERENCE, a brand-new component-based clinical information system (CIS). COHERENCE features generic healthcare-related and generic components. The healthcare-related components include the patient healthcare record, the activity, and the resource scheduler components. Major functions of the CIS were operational when the hospital opened in July 2000. The generic components include a reference manager, a security manager, a document manager, a Corba bus, and various mediation and supervision tools. Three years later, the unique patient record and the provider order entry systems are being used in 100 percent of relevant healthcare units. Seventy-four percent of biological orders and 66 percent of imaging orders are being entered directly by physicians. Sharing by physicians and nurses of the common, multimedia lifelong health record, including online availability of images, is being achieved in 100 percent of the units.

Created by merging three hospitals into one, Pompidou University Hospital employs a component-based clinical information system with integrated EHR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Iakovidis I. Toward personal health record: current situation, obstacles and trends in imple- mentation of electronic healthcare record in Europe. Int J Med Inform 1998; 52: 105–115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Van de Velde R, Degoulet P. Clinical information systems: a component-based approach. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dick RS, Steen EB, editors. The computerized-based patient record. An essential technology for health care. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McDonald CJ, Tierney WM. Computer-stored medical records. JAMA 1988; 259: 3433–3440.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chute CG. Clinical data retrieval and analysis. I’ve seen a case like that before. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1992; 670: 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Safran C, Chute CG. Exploration and exploitation of clinical databases. Int J Biomed Comput 1995; 39 (1): 151–156.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Uckert FK, Prokosch H. Implementing security and access control mechanisms for an electronic record. Proc AMIA Symp 2002; 825–829.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kuhn KA, Giuse DA. From hospital information systems to health information systems. Methods Inform Med 2001; 40: 275–287.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ross SE, Lin CT. The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: a review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10: 129–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sittig DF, Kuperman GJ, Fiskio J. Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system. Proc AMIA Symp 1999; 400–404.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gadd CS, Penrod LE. Dichotomy between physicians’ and patient’s attitudes regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. Proc AMIA Symp 2000; 275–279.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Penrod LE, Gadd CS. Attitudes of academic-based and community-based physicians regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. Proc AMIA Symp 2001; 528–532.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Doolan DF, Bates DW, James BC. The use of computers for clinical care: a case series of advanced US sites. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10: 94–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dayhoff RE, Kuzmak PM, Kirin G, Frank S. Providing a complete on-line multimedia patient record. Proc AMIA Symp 1999; 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clayton PD, Narus SP, Huff SM, et al. Building a comprehensive information system from components. The approach at Intermountain Health Care. Methods Inform Med 2003; 42: 1–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Borst F, Appel R, Baud R, Ligier Y, Scherrer JR. Happy birthday DIOGENE: a hospital information system born 20 years ago. Int J Med Inform 1999; 54: 157–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bleich HL, Slack WV. The CCC system in two teaching hospitals: a progress report. Int J Med Inform 1999; 54: 183–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McDonald C, Overhage JM, Tierney WM, et al. The Regenstrief medical record system: a quarter century experience. Int J Med Inform 1999; 54: 225–253.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bates D, Teich J, Lee J, et al. The impact of computerized order entry on medical error prevention. JAMIA 1999; 6 (4): 313–321.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Herzum P, Sims O. Business component factory. New York: Wiley; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. CEN TC251. Healthcare information system architecture. Part 1 (HISA). Healthcare middleware layer. prENV 12967–1. Brussels: CEN TC251, March 1997. [http:// www.centc251.org/].

    Google Scholar 

  22. HL7. Health level seven context management standard. Version 1.4, May 2001. [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/ccow_sigvi.htm].

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zahavi R, David S. Linthicum DS. Enterprise application integration with CORBA component and Web-based solutions. New York: Wiley; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lee J, Siau K, Hong S. Enterprise integration with ERP and EAI. Commun ACM 2003; 46 (2): 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. HL7. Health level seven context management standard. Version 1.4, May 2001. [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/ccow_sigvi.htm].

    Google Scholar 

  26. Orfali R, Harkey D, Edwards J. client/server survival guide, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Margulies D, McCallie D, Elkowitz A, Ribitzky R. An integrated hospital information system at Children’s Hospital. Proc SCAMC 1990; 699–703.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Degoulet P, Jean FC, Engelmann U, et al. The component-based architecture of the HELIOS medical software engineering environment. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1994; 45 (Suppl): S1 - S11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Spahni S, Scherrer JR, Sauquet D, Sottile PA. Towards specialised middleware for healthcare information systems. Int J Med Inform 1999; 53: 193–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Van de Velde R. Framework for a clinical information system. Int J Med Inform 2000; 57 (1): 57–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferrara FM. The standard “Healthcare Information Systems Architecture” and the DHE middleware. Int J Med Inform. 1998; 52 (1–3): 39–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sittig DF, Stead WW. Computer-based physician order entry. JAMIA 1994; 1: 108–123.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ash J, Gorman P, Lavelle M, Lyman J, Fournier L. Investigating physician order entry in the field: lessons learned in a multi-center study. MEDINFO 2001; 1107–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shu K, Boyle D, Spurr C, et al. Comparison of time spent writing orders on paper with computerized physician order entry. MEDINFO 2001; 1207–1211.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tonnesen AS, LeMaistre A, Tucker D. Electronic medical record implementation barriers encountered during implementation. Proc AMIA Symp 1999; 624–626.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Weir C, McCarthy C, Gohlinghorst S, Crockett R. Assessing the implementation process. Proc AMIA Symp 2000; 908–912.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Degoulet, P., Marin, L., Boiron, P., Delbecke, E. (2004). International Perspective Pompidou University Hospital in France: A Component-Based Clinical Information and Electronic Health Record System. In: Ball, M.J., Weaver, C.A., Kiel, J.M. (eds) Healthcare Information Management Systems. Health Informatics Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4041-7_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4041-7_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-2350-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4041-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics