IT: Transition Fundamentals in Care Transformation

  • Jeffrey S. Rose
Part of the Health Informatics Series book series (HI)

Abstract

The potential of information technology (IT) to safeguard patients, communicate medical information, accrue and organize health data, facilitate knowledge discovery, enhance process efficiency, and weave best “evidence” into the fabric of medical practice has been demonstrated in a variety of settings [2–14]. Widespread success in actually transforming care practices through clinical computing, however, remains unusual. A recent survey of health system chief information officers (CIOs) revealed that only about 2 percent had ever successfully implemented a comprehensive clinical system [15], and the health industry trails other endeavors in their adaptation to the information age [16–19].

Keywords

Information Technology Transition Fundamental Clinical Decision Support System Computerize Physician Order Entry Chief Information Officer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Machiavelli N. The prince. 1537. ch. 6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Overhage MA, Middleton B, et al. Does national mandate of provider order entry portend greater benefit than risk for health care delivery: the 2001 ACMI Debate. JAMIA 2002 May–June; 9(3):199–208.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hunt DL, et al. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systemic review. JAMA 1998; 280 (15): 1339–1346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shiffman RN, et al. Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systemic review of functionality and effectiveness. JAMA 1999; 6: 104–114.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patrino K, et al. EMR reduces costs and protects revenues. In: Kiel JM, editor. Information technology for the practicing physician. New York: Springer; 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Teich JM, Merchia PR, Schmiz JL, Kuperman GJ, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 2741–2747.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    William LG, Robert JD, Audrius P. Preventing exacerbation of an ADE with automated decision support. Journal of Healthcare Information Management 2002;(16)4.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raschke R. A computer alert system to prevent injury from adverse drug events: development and evaluation in a community teaching hospital. JAMA 1998; 280 (15): 1317–1320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA 1998; 280: 1311–1316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bates DW, Teich JM, Lee J, Seger D, Kuperman GJ, Ma’Luf N, Boyle D, Leape L. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. JAMA 1999; 6: 313–321.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tierney WM, Miller ME, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ. Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations: effects on resource utilization. JAMA 1993; 269: 379–383.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mekhjian HS, Kumar RR, Kuehn L, et al. Immediate benefits realized following implementation of physician order entry at an academic medical center. JAMA 2002; 9: 529–539.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller AS. Hosp Pharm 2002;37(6):644–646, 695.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taylor R, Manzo J, Sinnett M. Quantifying value for physician order-entry systems: a balance of cost and quality. Healthcare Financial Management 2002; July.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Geerlofs JP. Clinical software for strengthening the physician-patient relationship. In: Kiel JM, editor. Information technology for the practicing physician. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2000.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coddington D. Beyond managed care: how consumers and technology are changing the future of health care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2000.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    th Annual HIMSS Leadership Survey 2002. Superior Consulting.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Drazen E, et al. A primer on physician order entry. First Consulting Group, California Health-Care Foundation Publications; September 2000.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Strassmann P. The squandered computer: evaluating the business alignment of information technologies. New Canaan CT: The Information Economics Press;1997.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Edmondson B, Edmonson P. Speeding up team learning. Harvard Business Review 2001; Oct. 1.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lawrence D. From chaos to care: the promise of team-based medicine. Boulder, CO: Perseus; 2002.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wood GC. Serving the information needs of physicians. N Engl J Med 1972; 286 (11): 603–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Covell DG. Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med 1985; 103 (4): 596–599.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gorman P. Information needs in primary care. Med Info 2001; 10 (pt 1): 338–342.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tang PC. Traditional medical records as a source of clinical data in the outpatient setting. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994; 575–579.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Committee on Quality Health Care, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sharpe VA, Faden I. Medical harm: historical, conceptual and ethical dimensions of iatrogenic illness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eddy D, Billings S. The quality of medical evidence: implications for quality of care. Health Affairs 1988; 7 (1): 19–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Halvorson G. Strong medicine. New York: Random House; 1993.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Berwick D, Fineberg H, Weinstein M. When doctors meet numbers. Am J Med 1981; 71: 991–998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Weinstein M. Checking medicine’s vital signs. The New York Times 1998; April.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Berwick D, Nolan T. Physicians as leaders in improving health care. Ann Intern Med 1998; 28 (4): 289–292.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chassin M. Is health care ready for Six Sigma Quality? Millbank Quarterly 1998 Oct; 76(4).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Millenson M. Demanding medical excellence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Leape L. Controversies Institute of Medicine medical errors are not exaggerated. JAMA 2000; 284: 95–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wilson RM, et al. The quality in Australian health care study. Med J Aust 1995; 163 (9): 458–471.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gopher D, et al. Human Factors Society, 1999.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Steel K, et al. Latrogenic illness on a general medical service at a university hospital. NEJM 1981; 304 (11): 638–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Davenport TH. Information ecology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sheehy B. Train wrecks: why information technology investments derail. San Diego, CA: The Governance Institute; Fall 2001.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Johnson J. Chaos: the dollar drain of IT project failures. Appl Den Trends 1995; 2 (1): 41–47.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shortliffe EH, et al, editors. Medical informatics: computer applications in health care and biomedicine, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2001.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Maurer R. Beyond the wall of resistance. Austin, Texas: Bard Books; 1996.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lorenzi N. Antecedents of the people and organizational aspects of medical informatics: review of the literature. JAMA 1997; 4 (2): 79–93.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Worthley JA. Managing information in healthcare: concepts and cases. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Senge P. The dance of change. New York: Doubleday; 1999.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dickout R. Designing change programs that won’t cost you your job. McKinsey Quarterly 1995; No. 4.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Liebowitz J. Failure and lessons learned in information technology management. An International Journal, Cognizant Communication Corporation.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Robbins H, Finley M. Why change doesn’t work. Princeton, NJ: Peterson’s Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rose J, Ippolito L, Garver S. Run toward the roar: six counter-instinctive actions for organization success with health information technology. Connexions MGMA; Jan. 2001.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rose J. Medicine and the information age. Ivvins, TX: ACPE Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Clinicians for the restoration of autonomous practice (CRAP), EBM: unmasking the ugly truth. Br Med J 2002; 325: 1496 [satire].Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Robinson AR, et al. Physician and public opinion on quality of health care and the problem of medical errors. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rose JS. Lessons from life: the biology of business transformation. The Physician Executive 2001; Sept.–Oct.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Dorner D. The logic of failure. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1996.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gartner 24 January 2002.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Birkmeyer JD, et al. Leapfrog patient safety standards. Eff Clin Pract 2002;66(8).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Anderson, et al. JAMA 2002.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Goodman T. Utah’s medical error toll:18 deaths in one year [based on Report of the Utah Department of Heatlh]. Salt Lake Tribune 2002; Dec. 21.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Boodman J. No end to errors. The Washington Post 2002; Nov. 30.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ives B, Olson M. User involvement and MIS success: a review of research. Manag Sci 1984; 30: 586–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kotter JP. Leading change. Boston: Harvard University Press; 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey S. Rose

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations