Abstract
The increasing volume and complexity of civil litigation is placing a burden on court systems and juries. Civil trials are longer, and involve an increasing array of challenging legal and factual issues. Judges must often adopt a more active, managerial role, and attorneys must strike a balance between effective adversarial representation and cooperative handling of complex cases. The focus of this chapter is on the management of complex civil litigation. We start by tracing the history of the right to trial by jury, giving special attention to the complexity exception to this right. The legal debate surrounding the right to trial by jury in complex cases leads to a consideration of two important issues, each of which is addressed from both legal and social science perspectives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abitanta, S.E. (1982). Bifurcation of liability and damages in Rule 23(b)(3) class actions: History, policy, problems and a solution. Southwestern Law Journal, 36, 743–763.
Alschuler, A.W. (1989). The Supreme Court and the jury: Voir dire, peremptory challenges and the review of jury verdicts. The University of Chicago Law Review, 56, 153–233.
Anderson v. Cryovac, No. 82–1672, (D. Mass. 1982).
Annual Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. (1945–1987). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Asch, S.E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.
Atlas Roofing Co. v. OSHRC, 430 U.S. 441, 1977.
Austin, A.D. (1985, August 12). Why jurors don’t heed the trial; a set of proposals. National Law Journal, 7, 15.
Baltimore and Carolina Line Inc. v. Redman, 295 U.S. 654, 1935.
Beacon Theatres v. Westover, 359 U.S. 500, 1959.
Bermant, G., Cecil, J.S., Chaset, A.J., Lind, E.A., & Lombard, P.A. (1981). Protracted civil trials: Views from the bench and the bar. Washington DC: Federal Judicial Center.
Bernstein v. Universal Pictures Inc., 79 F.R.D. 59 (S.D.N.Y. 1978).
Bordens, K.S., & Horowitz, I.A. (1989). Mass tort civil litigation: The impact of procedural changes on jury decisions. Judicature, 73, 22–21.
Brazil, W.D. (1982). Special masters in the pretrial development of big cases: Potential and problems. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 287–374.
Brennan, T.A. (1988). Causal chains and statistical links: The role of scientific uncertainty in hazardous-substance litigation. Cornell Law Review, 73, 469–533.
Cecil, J.S., Hans, V.P., & Wiggins, E.C. (1991). Citizen comprehension of difficult issues: Lessons from civil jury trials. The American University Law Review, 40, 1901–1948.
Cecil, J.S., Lind, E.A., & Bermant, G. (1987). Jury service in lengthy trials. Washington DC: Federal Judicial Center.
Comment, Public Disclosures of Jury Deliberations. (1983). Harvard Law Review, 96, 886–906.
Dairy Queen v. Wood, 369 U.S. 469, 1962.
Devlin, P. (1980). Jury trial of complex cases: English practice at the time of the seventh amendment. Columbia Law Review, 80, 43–107.
Dombroff, M.A. (1982, September 6). Techniques to simplify complex presentations at jury trials. National Law Journal, 4, 21.
Doob, A.N., & Kirschenbaum, H.M. (1973). Bias in police lineups—Partial remembering. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 1, 287–293.
Durham, C. (1986). Taming the “monster case”: Management of complex litigation. Law & Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 4, 123–135.
Elliott, E.D. (1986). Managerial judging and the evolution of procedure. University of Chicago Law Review, 53, 306–336.
Elwork, A., Sales, B.D., & Alfini, J.J. (1977). Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it? Law and Human Behavior, 1, 163–189.
Federal Judicial Center. (1981). Experimentation in the law. Washington DC: Author.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Courts. (1990). St Paul, MN: West Publishing.
Federal Rules of Evidence for the United States Courts and Magistrates. (1990). St Paul, MN: West Publishing.
Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (1984). Social cognition. New York: Random House.
Glass, A.L., Holyoak, K.J., & Santa, J.L. (1979). Cognition. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.
Goodman, J., Greene, E., & Loftus, E.F. (1985). What confuses jurors in complex cases: Judges and jurors outline the problem. Trial, 21, 65–74.
Grady, J.F. (1982). Trial management and jury control in antitrust cases. Antitrust Law Journal, 57, 249–260.
Greenwald, A.G., & Pratkanis, A.R. (1984). The self. In R.S. Wyer & T.K. Srull (Eds.), The handbook of social cognition (pp. 129–178).
Hans, V.P., & Vidmar, N. (1986). Judging the jury. New York: Plenum.
Hazard, G.C., & Rice, P.R. (1982). Judicial management of the pretrial process in massive litigation: Special masters as case managers. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 377–418.
Heuer, L., & Penrod, S. (1988). Increasing jurors’ participation in trials: A field experiment with jury notetaking and question asking. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 231–262.
Heuer, L., & Penrod, S. (1989). Instructing jurors: A field experiment with written and preliminary instructions. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 409–430.
Horowitz, I.A., & Bordens, K.S. (1990). An experimental investigation of procedural issues in complex tort trials. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 269–286.
Hovland, C.I. (1957). Order of presentation in persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hovland, CL, Janis, I.L., & Kelley, H.H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
ILC Peripherals v. International Business Machines, 458 F.Supp. 423, (N.D. Cal. 1978).
In re Boise Cascade Securities Litigation, 420 F.Supp. 99, (W.D. Wash. 1976).
In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust Litigation, 631 F.2d 1069 (3rd Cir. 1980).
In re U.S. Financial Securities Litigation, 609 F.2d 411 (9th Cir. 1979).
Jones, E.E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A.H., Markus, H., Miller, D.T., & Scott, R.A. (1984). Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.) (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Kalven, H., Jr. (1964). The dignity of the civil jury. Virginia Law Review, 50, 1055–1075.
Kassin, S.M., & Wrightsman, L.S. (1979). On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1877–1887.
Kian v. Mirro Aluminum Co., 88 F.R.D. 351 (E.D. Mich., 1980).
Lempert, R.O. (1981). Civil juries and complex cases: Let’s not rush to judgement. Michigan Law Review, 50, 68–132.
Lerner, M., & Miller, D. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051.
Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
Lüneburg, W.V., & Nordenberg, M.A. (1981). Specially qualified juries and expert non-jury tribunals: Alternatives for coping with the complexities of modern civil litigation. Virginia Law Review, 67, 887–1007.
MacCoun, R.J. (1985). Evaluating jury performance (Book review). Judicature, 69, 56.
Manual for complex litigation (5th ed.). (1982). St Paul, MN: West Publishing.
Manual for complex litigation, second. (1985). St Paul, MN: West Publishing.
McGuire, W.J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 233–346). New York: Random House
McLaughlin, M.A. (1983). Questions to witnesses and notetaking by the jury as aids in understanding complex litigation. New England Law Review, 18, 687–713.
Miller, N., & Campbell, D.T. (1959). Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 1–9.
Moore’s Federal Practice (2nd ed.). (1972, 1986–1987 suppl.). New York: Matthew Bender.
Nisbett, R.E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference-Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
Nordenberg, M.A., & Lüneburg, W.V. (1982). Decisionmaking in complex federal cases: Two alternatives to the traditional jury. Judicature, 65, 420–431.
Note, The right to an incompetent jury: Protracted commercial litigation and the seventh amendment (1978). Connecticut Law Review, 10, 775–800.
Olander, D. (1985). Resolving inconsistencies in federal special verdicts. Fordham Law Review, 53, 1089–1106.
Pack, K.P. (1980–1981). The right to jury trial in complex litigation—In re Japanese Products Antitrust Litigation. International Trade Law Journal, 6, 133–143.
Radial Lip Mach. Inc. v. International Carbide Corp., 76 F.R.D. 224, (N.D. 111. 1977).
Richardson v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical Inc., No. 83–1055, (D.D.C.) 1983.
Ross v. Bernhard, 396 U.S. 531, 1970.
Sand, L.B., & Reiss, L.B. (1985). A report on seven experiments conducted by district court judges in the Second Circuit. New York University Law Review, 60, 423–497.
Schuck, P.H. (1986). The role of judges in settling complex cases: The Agent Orange example. University of Chicago Law Review, 53, 337–365.
Schwarzer, W.W. (1982a). Managing antitrust and other complex litigation: A handbook for lawyers and judges. Charlottesville, VA: Michie.
Schwarzer, W.W. (1982b). Techniques for identifying and narrowing issues in antitrust cases. Antitrust Law Journal, 51, 223–229.
Strawn, D.U., & Munsterman, G.T. (1982). Helping juries handle complex cases. Judicature, 65, 444–447.
Sue, S., Smith, R.E., & Caldwell, C. (1973). Effects of inadmissable evidence on the decisions of simulated jurors: A moral dilemma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 345–353.
Taylor, R.P., Becker, E.R., McSweeney, M.J., Pointer, S.C., & Schreiber, S. (1985). Panel discussion. Charting a new course for complex cases: The New Manual for Complex Litigation, Second. (A.B.A. Section of Antitrust Law, 33rd Annual Meeting, Washington DC: July 8–10, 1985). Antitrust Law Journal, 54, 417–455.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thompson, W.C., Fong, G.T., & Rosenhan, D.L. (1981). Inadmissable evidence and juror verdicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 453–463.
Thompson, W.C., & Schumann, E.L. (1987). Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor’s fallacy and the defense attorneys’ fallacy. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 167–188.
Treadway, M. (1990, March). An investigation of juror comprehension of statistical proof of causation. Paper presented at the Biennial Midwinter Conference of the American Psychology and Law Society, Williamsburg, VA.
United States v. Maclean, 578 F.2d 64 (3rd Cir. 1978).
Walker, L. (1988). Perfecting federal civil rules: A proposal for restricted field experiments. Law and Contemporary Problems, 51, 67–85.
Wiggins, E.C., & Breckler, S.J. (1990). Special verdicts as guides to jury decision making. Law and Psychology Review, 14, 1–41.
Willging, T.E. (1986). Court appointed experts. Washington DC: Federal Judicial Center.
Withey, C.P. (1982). Court-sanctioned means of improving jury competence in complex civil litigation. Arizona Law Review, 24, 715–731.
Withrow, J.W., & Suggs, D.L. (1980). Procedures for improving jury trials of complex litigation. Antitrust Bulletin, 25, 493–512.
Wright, C.A., & Miller, A.R. (1971, 1986 suppl.). Federal Practice and Procedure. St Paul, MN: West Publishing.
Zeisel, H., & Callahan, T. (1963). Split trials and time saving: A statistical analysis. Harvard Law Review, 76, 1606–1625.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wiggins, E.C., Breckler, S.J. (1992). Management of Complex Civil Litigation. In: Kagehiro, D.K., Laufer, W.S. (eds) Handbook of Psychology and Law. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4038-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4038-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4040-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4038-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive