Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rethinking Privacy Torts: A View Toward a Psycholegal Perspective

  • Chapter
Handbook of Psychology and Law

Abstract

Privacy torts (and torts in general) have been a neglected area of psycholegal research. The lack of research in this area can be partially explained by ethical and methodological constraints, which make it difficult to conduct privacy research. Most empirical studies have measured privacy as an attitude, interest, or value. Unfortunately, many of these studies do not translate easily into assessing the behavioral assumptions contained in judicial opinions and made by legal commentators. However, with a proper understanding of the legal treatment of privacy, there is great opportunity for psychologists to assess the validity of legal assumptions about privacy and inform policy makers. The purpose of this chapter is to facilitate the task of conducting psycholegal research on privacy by exploring strategies that are appropriate to conducting research on privacy torts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory and crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Law Institute. (1939). Restatement of the law, torts (Chapter 42, sec. 867). St. Paul, MN: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Law Institute. (1977). Restatement (second) of the law, torts (Chapter 28, sec. 652A-I). St. Paul, MN: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Law Institute. (1987). Restatement (second) of the law, torts: Apperdix. St. Paul, MN: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldus, D.C., Pulaski, CA., & Woodworth, G. (1986). Arbitrariness and discrimination in the administration of the death penalty: A challenge to state supreme courts. Stetson Law Review, 15, 134–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, D. (1985). Research using intentional deception: Ethical issues revisited. American Psychologist, 40, 165–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bermant, G., & Wheeler, R.R. (1987). From within the system: Educational and research programs at the federal judicial center. In G.B. Melton (Ed.), Reforming the law: Impact of child development research (pp. 102–145). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitsie v. Walston, 85 N.M. 655, 515 P.2d 659 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brents v. Morgan, 221 Ky. 765, 299 S.W. 967 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boruch, R., Dennis, M., & Cecil, J. (1987). Fifty years of empirical research on privacy. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossley, M.I. (1976). Privacy and crowding: A multidisciplinary analysis. Man-Environment Systems, 6, 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody v. Overlook Hospital, 127 N.J. Super 331, 317 A.2d 392 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Byfield v. Candler, 33 Ga. 275, 125 S.E. 905 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cal Civ. Code Sec. 990, 3344 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson v. Here’s Johnny Portable Toilets, Inc., 498 F. Supp. 71 (E.D. Mich., 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, V.C., Paulus, P.B., & McCain, G. (1984). Prison crowding research: The relevance for prison housing standards and a general approach regarding crowding phenomena. American Psychologist, 39, 1148–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohen, 420 U.S. 469 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G., & Altman, I. (1976). Territories at the work-place: Theory into design guidelines. Man-Environment Systems, 6, 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionisopoulos, P.A., & Ducat, C.R. (1976). The right to privacy: Essays and cases. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eoyang, C.K. (1974). Effects of group size and privacy in residential crowding. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 30, 389–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettore v. Philco Television Broadcasting Co., 229 F.2d 481, 485 (3rd Cir. 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C.T. (1975). Privacy as a profile of authentic consciousness. Humanitas, 11, 21-A3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C.T. (1980). Privacy and human development. In W.C. Bier (Ed.), Privacy (pp. 37–46). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C 552 et seq. (1982 & Suppl. 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C., 522(a) (1982 & Suppl. 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Rules of Evidence. (1986). Binghamton, NY: Gould. Froelich v. Adair, 213 Kan. 357, 516 P.2d 993 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Froelich v. Werbin, 219 Kan. 461, 548 P.2d 482 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C Cir., 1923).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galella v. Onassis, 487 F.2d 986 (2nd Cir., 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co., 166 Or. 482, 113 P.2d 438 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M., Grinnel, R.M., & Blanchard, R. (1978). A test of a shorter privacy preference scale. Journal of Psychology, 98, 207–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ideal Toy Corp. v. Kenner Products, 443 F.Suppl. 291 (S.D.N.Y., 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagehiro, D.K., Harland, A.T., & Taylor R.B. (1991). “Reasonable expectation of privacy” and third-party consent searches. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, P.H., & Rubenstein, D.I. (1977). The concept privacy and its biological basis. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 52–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Crone v. Ohio Bell Tel. Co., 114 Ohio App. 299, 182 N.E.2d 15 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latin, H. (1976). Privacy: A selected bibliography and topical index of social science materials. Hackensack, NJ: Fred B. Rothman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, R.S., & Wolfe, M. (1977). Privacy as a concept and a social issue: A multidimensional developmental theory. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, H.A., & Askin, F. (1977). Privacy in the courts: Law and social reality. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 138–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, S.T. (1977). Conceptions and privacy: Current status and nest steps. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, N.J. (1974). Dimensions of privacy preferences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 9, 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDanial v. Atlanta Coca Cola Bottling Co., 60 Ga. App. 92, 2 S.E.2d 810 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKlesky v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G.B., (1983). Minors and privacy: Are legal and psychological concepts compatible? Nebraska Law Review, 62, 455–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G.B., & Hafemeister, T.L. (1987). The impact of social science research on the judiciary. In G.B. Melton (Ed.), Reforming the law: Impact of child development research (pp. 27–62). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G.B., Petrilla, J., Poythress, N.G., & Slobogin, C. (1987). Psychological evaluations for the courts. NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (1987). Social science reserch in law: A new paradigm. American Psychologist, 6, 465–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Note. (1970). The emerging tort of intrusion, Iowa Law Review, 55, 718–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton v. La Prade, 524 F.2d 862 (3rd Cir. 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Co., 122 Ga. 190, 50 S.E. 68 (1905).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, W. (1960). Privacy. California Law Review, 48, 383–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes v. Graham, 238 Ky. 225, 37 S.W.2d 716 (1931). Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, M.J. (1986). The law does not live by eyewitness testimony alone. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 279–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simitis, S. (1987). Reviewing privacy in an information society. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 135, 707–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, M.A. & Scalora, M. (1991). Assessing mental injury claims arising from privacy invasions. Forensic Reports, 4, 337–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.E. (1985). Celebrities and privacy. Washington DC: Privacy Journal. Southerland v. Kroeger, 144 W. Va. 673, 110 S.E.2d 716 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. (1975). Society of the alone: Freedom, privacy and utilitarianism as dominant norms in the SRO. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 230–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, E.F., Gueutal, H.G., Gardner, D.G., & Mclure, S. (1983). A field experiment comparing information privacy values, beliefs, and attitudes across several types of organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 459–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takanishi, R., & Melton, G.B. (1987). Child development research and the legislative process. In Melton G.B. (Ed.), Reforming the law: Impact of child development research (pp. 86–101). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennessee Personal Rights Protection Act. Tenn. Code Ann. 47–25, 1101–08 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremper, C.R., & Samll, M.A. (1988). Privacy regulation of computer assisted testing and instruction. Washington Law Review, 63, 841–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolchinski, P.D., McCuddy, M.K., Adams, J., Ganster, D.C., Woodman, R.W., & Fromkin, F. (1981). Employee perceptions of invasions of privacy: A field simulation experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 308–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderbilt v. Mitchell, 72 N.J. Eq. 910, 67 A. 97 (1907).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, W. H. (1981). A taxonomy for privacy. In American Bar Association s Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities Committee on Privacy, Invited papers on privacy: Law, ethics, and technology (pp. 27–29). Washington DC: American Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren S.D., & Brandeis L.D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4, 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E.J., Campbell, D.T., Schwartz, R.D., Sechrest L., & Grove, J.B. (1981). Nonreac-tive measures in the social sciences. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh v. Pritchard, 125 Mont. 517, 241 P.2d 816 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westin, A. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R.W., Ganster, D.C., Adams, J., McCuddy, M.K., Tolchinski, P.D., & Fromkin, F. (1982). A survey of employee perceptions of information privacy in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 647–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman v. Wilson, 81 F.2d 247 (3rd. Cir. 1936).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Mark A. Small
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard L. Wiener
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. 19130, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Dorothy K. Kagehiro

  2. Department of Legal Studies, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 19104-6369, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    William S. Laufer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Small, M.A., Wiener, R.L. (1992). Rethinking Privacy Torts: A View Toward a Psycholegal Perspective. In: Kagehiro, D.K., Laufer, W.S. (eds) Handbook of Psychology and Law. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4038-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4038-7_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4040-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4038-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation