Modern Social-Scientific Theories and Data Concerning Discrimination: Implications for Using Social Science Evidence in the Courts

  • Alan J. Tomkins
  • Jeffrey E. Pfeifer

Abstract

As we enter the last decade of the 20th century, it is easy to look back over the years and recognize that the civil rights movement has come a long way since the days of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the U.S. Supreme Court case that held that segregated facilities were not prohibited as a matter of constitutional law. In a society in which the nation’s highest court could assert such a proposition (and further assert that “[i]f one race be inferior to the other socially” there was nothing that a Court decision could do to about it and that if black people felt bad about themselves in a segregated society, it was “solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it” Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896, pp. 551–552), it is hardly surprising that acts of overt discrimination were common, especially against African-American targets.

Keywords

Social Distance Employment Discrimination Prejudicial Attitude Disparate Treatment Symbolic Racism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (1988, June). Brief for Amicus Curiae American Psychological Association in Support of Respondent, Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 109 S.Ct. 1775 (1989).Google Scholar
  2. Ashmore, R.D. (1981). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. In D.L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 37–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Ashmore, R.D., & Del Boca, F.K. (1981). Conceptual approaches to stereotypes and stereotyping. In D.L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Babcock, N., & Friedman, R. (1975). Sex discrimination and the law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  5. Baldus, D.C., & Cole, J.W. (1980). Statistical proof of discrimination. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Baldus, D.C., Woodworth, G., & Pulaski, C. (1989). Equal justice and the death penalty: A legal and empirical analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bazemore v. Friday, 478 U.S. 385 (1986).Google Scholar
  8. Bechtold, A., Naccarato, M.E., & Zanna, M.P. (1986). Need for structure and the prejudice- discrimination link. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
  9. Benokraitis, N.V., & Feagin, J.R. (1986). Modern sexism: Blatant, subtle, and covert discrimination. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Bersoff, D.N. (1988). Should subjective employment devices be scrutinized? It’s elementary, my dear Mrs. Watson. American Psychologist, 43, 1016–1018.Google Scholar
  11. Bogardus, E.S. (1925a). Analyzing change in public opinion. Journal of Applied Sociology, 9, 372–381.Google Scholar
  12. Bogardus, E.S. (1925b). Measuring social distance. Journal of Applied Sociology, 9, 299–308.Google Scholar
  13. Bogardus, E.S. (1925c). Social distance and its origin. Journal of Applied Sociology, 9, 216–226.Google Scholar
  14. Bogardus, E.S. (1927). Race friendliness and social distance. Journal of Applied Sociology, 11, 272–287.Google Scholar
  15. Borgida, E., & Nisbett, R. (1977). The differential impact of abstract vs. concrete information on decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 258–271.Google Scholar
  16. Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986).Google Scholar
  17. Brief for Appellee-Cross Appellant, Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse, 825 F.2d 458 (D.C. Cir. 1987).Google Scholar
  18. Brief for Petitioner, Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 109 S. Ct. 1775 (1989).Google Scholar
  19. Broverman, I.K., Broverman, D.M., Clarkson, F.E., Rosenkrantz, P.S., & Vogel, S.R. (1970). Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 1–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar
  21. Bullough, V.L. (1973). The subordinate sex. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  22. Cameron, C. (1977). Sex-role attitudes. In S. Oskamp, Attitudes and opinions (pp. 339–359). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Citizens’ Commission on Civil Rights. (1989). One nation, indivisible: The civil rights challenge for the 1990s. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  24. Clark, K.B., & Clark, M.P. (1958). Racial identification and preference in Negro children. In E.E. Maccoby, T.M. Newcomb, & E.L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (3rd Ed., pp. 602–611). NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (Original work published 1947)Google Scholar
  25. Cook, S.W., & Sellitz, C. (1964). A multiple indicator approach to attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 62, 36–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Connecticut v. Teal, 457 U.S. 440 (1982).Google Scholar
  27. Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371 – 386.Google Scholar
  28. Crosby, F. (1990, August). Affirmative action: Applying what we know to promote justice. Invited address presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  29. Crosby, F., Bromley, S., & Saxe, L. (1980). Recent unobtrusive studies of black and white discrimination and prejudice: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 546–563.Google Scholar
  30. Dawson, J. (1980). Are statistics being fair to employment discrimination plaintiffs? Jurimetrics Journal, 21, 1–20.Google Scholar
  31. Deaux, K. (1985). Sex and gender. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 49–81.Google Scholar
  32. Del Boca, F.K., & Ashmore, R.D. (1980). Sex stereotypes through the life cycle. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review ofpersonality and social psychology: 1 (pp. 163–192). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Deri, S., Dinnerstein, D., Harding, J., & Pepitone, A.D. (1948). Techniques for the diagnosis and measurement of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 45, 248–271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Dipboye, R.L., Fromkin, H.L., & Wiback, K. (1975). Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 39–45.Google Scholar
  35. Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977).Google Scholar
  36. Dovidio, J.F., & Gaertner, S.L. (Eds.). (1986). Prejudice, discrimination and racism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Dovidio, J.F., & Gaertner, S.L. (1988). Changes in the expression and assessment of racial prejudice. Paper presented at the conference on Opening Doors: An Appraisal of Race Relations in America, Tuscaloosa, AL.Google Scholar
  38. Eagly, A.H., & Steffen, V.J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754.Google Scholar
  39. Elkins, J.R. (Ed.). (1990). Pedagogy of narrative: A symposium. Journal of Legal Education [special issue], 40(1, 2), 1–250.Google Scholar
  40. Fidell, L.S. (1970). Empirical verification of sex discrimination in hiring practices in psychology. American Psychologist, 25, 1094–1098.Google Scholar
  41. Fineman, M. (1983). Implementing equality: Ideology, contradiction and social change. A study of rhetoric and result in the regulation of the consequences of divorce. Wisconsin Law Review, 1983, 789–886.Google Scholar
  42. Fineman, M. (1988). Dominant discourse, professional language, and legal change in child custody decisionmaking. Harvard Law Review, 101, 121–114. Google Scholar
  43. Fiske, S.T. (1982). Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perception. In M.S. Clarke & S.T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition: The 17th annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 55–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Fiske, S.T., & Pavelchak, M.A. (1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. In R.M. Sorrentino & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 167–203). NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  45. Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (1984). Social cognition. NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  46. Gaertner, S.L., & Dovidio, J.F. (1986). The aver-sive form of racism. In J.F. Dovidio & S.L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and, racism (pp. 61–89). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Goldberg, P. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women? Transaction, 5, 28–30.Google Scholar
  48. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971).Google Scholar
  49. Gunter, B. (1986). Television and sex role stereotyping. London: John Libbey.Google Scholar
  50. Hamilton, D.L. (Ed.). (1981). Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  51. Hamilton, D.L., & Trolier, T.K. (1986). Stereotypes and stereotyping: An overview of the cognitive approach. In J. Dovidio & S.L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 127–163). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  52. Hampton, H., & Fayer, S. (1990). Voices for freedom: An oral history of the Civil Rights movement from the 1950s through the 1980s. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  53. Harding, J., Proshansky, H., Kutner, B., & Chein, I. (1969). Prejudice and ethnic relations. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 5, 2nd Ed., pp. 1–76). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  54. Hastie, R., Penrod, S.D., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Hazelwood School Dist. v. United States, 433 U.S. 299 (1977).Google Scholar
  56. Henley, N.M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  57. Hishon v. King & Spaulding, 467 U.S. 69 (1984).Google Scholar
  58. Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse, 618 F. Supp. 1109 (D.D.C. 1985).Google Scholar
  59. Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse, 825 F.2d 458 (D.C. Cir. 1987).Google Scholar
  60. Horowitz, I.A., & Willging, T.E. (1984). The psychology of law: Integrations and applications. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  61. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977).Google Scholar
  62. Jackman, M.R. (1978). General and applied tolerance: Does education increase commitment to racial integration? American Journal of Political Science, 22, 302–324.Google Scholar
  63. Jordan, W.D. (1968). White over black: American attitudes toward the Negro 1550–1812. Maryland: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  64. Kahn, E.D., & Robbins, L. (1985). Sex discrimination and sex equity for faculty women in the 1980s. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 1–16.Google Scholar
  65. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251.Google Scholar
  66. Katz, D., & Braly, K.W. (1933). Racial stereotypes of 100 college students. Abnormal Social Psychology, 28, 280–290.Google Scholar
  67. Katz, I., Wackenhut, J. & Hass, R.G. (1986). Racial ambivalence, value duality, and behavior. In J.F. Dovidio & S.L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 35–59). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  68. Katz, P.A., & Taylor, D.A. (Eds.). (1988). Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  69. Kaye, D.H. (1982a). The numbers game: Statistical inference in discrimination cases. Michigan Law Review, 80, 833–856.Google Scholar
  70. Kaye, D.H. (1982b). Statistical evidence of discrimination. Journal of American Statistical Association, 77, 773–783.Google Scholar
  71. Kinder, D.R., & Sears, D.O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 414–431.Google Scholar
  72. Kluger, R. (1976). Simple justice: The history of Brown v. Board of Education and Black Americas struggle for equality. NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  73. Kovel, J. (1970). White racism: A psychohistory. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  74. Kutner, B., Wilkins, C., & Yarrow, P.R. (1952). Verbal attitudes and overt behavior involving social prejudice. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 649–652.Google Scholar
  75. LaPiere, R.T. (1934). Attitudes vs actions. Social Forces, 13, 230–237.Google Scholar
  76. Lewin, A.Y., & Duchan, L. (1971). Women in academia. Science, 173, 892–895.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Livingston, J.A. (1982). Responses to sexual harassment on the job: Legal, organizational, and individual actions. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 5–22.Google Scholar
  78. Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162 (1986).Google Scholar
  79. Loh, W.D. (1984). Social research in the judicial process: Cases, readings, and text. NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  80. Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337 (9th Cir. 1981), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 823 (1982).Google Scholar
  81. McCleskey v. Kemp, 753 F.2d 877 (11th Cir. 1985).Google Scholar
  82. McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987).Google Scholar
  83. McCleskey v. Zant, 580 F. Supp. 338 (N.D. Ga. 1984).Google Scholar
  84. McConahay, J.B. (1983). Modern racism and modern discrimination: The effects of race, racial attitudes, and context on simulated hiring decisions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 551–558.Google Scholar
  85. McConahay, J.B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J.F. Dovidio & S.L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and, racism (pp. 91–125). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  86. McConahay, J.B., Hardee, B.B., & Batts, V. (1981). Has racism declined in America? It depends on who is asking and what is asked. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25, 563–579.Google Scholar
  87. McConahay, J.B., & Hough, J.C. (1976). Symbolic racism. Journal of Social Issues, 32(2), 23–45.Google Scholar
  88. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973).Google Scholar
  89. Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (1986). Social authority: Obtaining, evaluating, and establishing social science in law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 134, 477–517.Google Scholar
  90. Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (1990). Social sciences in law: Cases and materials (2nd Ed.). Westbury, NY: Foundation.Google Scholar
  91. Murphy, G., & Likert, R. (1938). Public opinion and the individual. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  92. Nisbett, R., Borgida, E., Crandall, C., & Reed, H. (1982). Popular induction: Information is not necessarily informative. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 101–116). NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Osofsky, G. (1967). The burden of race. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  94. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1981). Juror decisionmaking models: The generalization gap. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 246–287.Google Scholar
  95. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242–258.Google Scholar
  96. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 521–533.Google Scholar
  97. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1990). Practical implications of psychological research on juror and decision-making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 90–105.Google Scholar
  98. Personnel Administrator v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979).Google Scholar
  99. Pettigrew, T. (1985). New black-white patterns: How best to conceptualize them? Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 329–346.Google Scholar
  100. Pfeifer, J.E. (1988). Courtroom prejudice: An application of symbolic sexism. Contemporary Social Psychology, 13, 1–8.Google Scholar
  101. Pfeifer, J.E. (1990a, June). Extra-evidential defendant characteristics and juror decision-making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
  102. Pfeifer, J.E. (1990b). Reviewing the empirical evidence on jury racism: Findings of discrimination or discriminatory findings? Nebraska Law Review, 69, 230–250.Google Scholar
  103. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).Google Scholar
  104. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 109 S. Ct. 1775 (1989).Google Scholar
  105. Provine, W.B. (1973). Geneticists and the biology of race crossing. Science, 182, 790–796.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Reid, P.T. (1988). Racism and sexism: Comparisons and conflicts. In P.A. Katz & D.A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 203–221). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  107. Riker, B.L. (1944). A comparison of methods used in attitude research. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 39, 24–42.Google Scholar
  108. Rosen, P.L. (1972). The Supreme Court and social science. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  109. Rosscin, M.T. (1990). Employment discrimination: Law and litigation. New York: Clark Boardman.Google Scholar
  110. Ruble, D.N., & Ruble, T.L. (1982). Sex stereotypes. In A.G. Miller (Ed.), In the eye of the beholder: Contemporary issues in stereotyping (pp. 188–252). NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
  111. Sears, D.O. (1988). Symbolic racism. In P.A. Katz & D.A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 53–84). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  112. Schlei, B.L., & Grossman, P. (1983). Employment discrimination law (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar
  113. Swim, J., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G., & Myers, D.G. (1989). Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 409–429.Google Scholar
  114. Taub, E. (1980). Keeping women in their place: Stereotyping per se as a form of employment discrimination. Boston College Law Review, 21, 345–418.Google Scholar
  115. Tavris, C., & Offir, C. (1977). The longest war: Sex differences in perspective. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  116. Taylor, S.E., & Fiske, S.T. (1978). Salience, attention and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. Advances in Experimental and Social Psychology, 11, 249–288.Google Scholar
  117. Taylor, S.E., Fiske, S.T., Etcoff, N.L., & Ruderman, A.J. (1978). Categorical bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778–793.Google Scholar
  118. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 (1981).Google Scholar
  119. Thurstone, L.L. (1931). The measurement of change in social attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 230–235.Google Scholar
  120. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§2000e et seq.Google Scholar
  121. Tomkins, A.J. (1989, May). Federal courts’ use of social science evidence in discrimination cases: The big problem of small effects. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  122. Tomkins, A.J. (Chair). (1988, August). Federal judges’ perspectives: Using social science evidence to prove discrimination. Roundtable discussion at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  123. Tomkins, A.J., & Boucher, K.L. (1990). Using social scientific and statistical evidence to prove discrimination: Prospects for the future. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  124. Tomkins, A.J., & Cecil, J. (1987, August). The use of social science in Constitutional decisionmaking. In A.J. Tomkins (Chair), Social science and the Constitution: Perspectives and roles. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.Google Scholar
  125. Tribe, L.H. (1971). Trial by mathematics: Precision and ritual in the legal process. Harvard Law Review, 84, 1329–1393.Google Scholar
  126. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.Google Scholar
  127. Twiss, C., Tabb, S., & Crosby, F.J. (1989). Affirmative action and aggregate data: The importance of patterns in the perception of discrimination. In F.A. Blanchard & F.J. Crosby, Affirmative action in perspective (pp. 159–167). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  128. van den Berghe, P.L. (1967). Race and racism: A contemporary perspective. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  129. Walker, L., & Monahan, J. (1987). Social frameworks: A new use of social science in law. Virginia Law Review, 73, 559–612.Google Scholar
  130. Wallston, B.S., & O’Leary, V.E. (1981). Sex makes a difference: Differential perceptions of women and men. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 9–42). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  131. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio, 109 S. Ct. 2115 (1989).Google Scholar
  132. Watson v. Fort Worth Bank and Trust, 108 S. Ct. 2777 (1988).Google Scholar
  133. Weinberg, M.L. (1989). Sexual stereotyping. Case and Comment, 94(Jan.-Feb.), 3–6.Google Scholar
  134. Williams, J. (1987). Eyes on the prize: Americas civil rights years, 1954–1965. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  135. Williams, J.H. (1977). Psychology of women: Behavior in a biosocial context. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan J. Tomkins
  • Jeffrey E. Pfeifer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations