Advertisement

The “Guilty Mind:” Mens Rea

  • Stephen J. Morse

Abstract

Few legal terms confuse behavioral scientists and mental health professionals more than mens rea (guilty mind), largely because the law employs the term in diverse and often inconsistent ways. This chapter attempts to clarify the numerous confusions and to explain why mens rea is central to criminal liability. It begins with a brief introduction to criminal liability and the most general usages of mens rea, establishes a working vocabulary, and provides an understanding of the relevant criminal law doctrines. The chapter then addresses the law’s concept of the person and the moral justifications for punishment because the requirement of mens rea for criminal liability is derived from these considerations. The chapter then examines in detail the technical meaning of mens rea, including the distinction between “specific” and “general” intent.

Keywords

Criminal Liability Strict Liability Special Mens Model Penal Code Judgment Error 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Law Institute (1962). Model Penal Code (Proposed Official Draft). Philadelphia: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Law Institute (1985). Model Penal Code and Commentaries (official draft and revised comments) (6 Vols.). Philadelphia: Author.Google Scholar
  3. American Medical Association (Board of Trustees) (1984). Insanity defense in criminal trials and limitations of psychiatric testimony. Journal of the American Medical Association, 251, 2967–2981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed. rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  5. Ashworth, A. (1976). “The doctrine of provocation.” Cambridge Law Journal, 35, 292–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. California Penal Code (West, 1988).Google Scholar
  7. Cleary, E.W. et al. (1984). McCormick on evidence (3rd Edition). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Commonwealth v. O’Searo, 466 Pa. 224 (1976).Google Scholar
  9. Davidson, D. (1963). “Actions, reasons and causes.” In D. Davidson, Essays on actions and events, pp. 3–19. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. Diamond, B. (1961). Criminal responsibility of the mentally ill. Stanford Law Review, 14, 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Director of Public Prosecutions v. Hyam, 2 All E.R. 41 (H.L.) (1974).Google Scholar
  12. Dressier, J. (1987a). Understanding criminal law. New York: Matthew Bender.Google Scholar
  13. Dressier, J. (1987b). Justifications and excuses: A brief review of the literature. Wayne Law Review, 33, 1155–1175.Google Scholar
  14. Duff, R.A. (1980). Intention, recklessness, and probable consequences. Criminal Law Review, 1980, 404–412.Google Scholar
  15. English Homicide Act. 5 & 6 Eliz. II, Ch. II. (1957).Google Scholar
  16. Feinberg, J. (1984). Harm to Others. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fingarette, H. & Hasse, A. (1979). Mental disabilities and criminal responsibility. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fingarette, H. (1985). Victimization: A legalist analysis of coercion, deception, undue influence, and excusable prison escape. Washington & Lee Law Review, 42, 65–118.Google Scholar
  19. Flanagan, O.J., Jr. (1984). The science of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fletcher, G. (1978). Rethinking criminal law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  21. Greenawalt, K. (1984). The perplexing borders of justification and excuse. Columbia Law Review, 84, 1897–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grünbaum, A. (1972). Free will and laws of human behavior. In H. Feigel, W. Sellars, & K. Lehrer (Eds.), New readings in philosophical analysis (pp. 605–627). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  23. Hart, H.L. A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility: Essays in the philosophy of law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hollander, P. (1973). Sociology, selective determinism, and the rise of expectations. American Sociologist, 8, 147–153.Google Scholar
  26. Idaho Code (1987).Google Scholar
  27. In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970).Google Scholar
  28. Kadish, S. (1968). “The decline of innocence.” In S. Kadish, Blame and punishment: Essays in the criminal law, pp. 65–80. New York: Macmillan, 1987.Google Scholar
  29. Kadish, S. & Schulhofer, S. (1989). Criminal law and its processes (5th Ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  30. Keedy, E. (1954). Criminal attempts at common law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 102, 464–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klein, M. (1990). Determinism, blameworthiness, and deprivation. Oxford, England: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. LaFave, W. & Scott, A. Jr. (1986). Criminal law (2nd Ed.). Minneapolis, MN: West.Google Scholar
  33. Law Commission (Great Britain) (1978). Report on the mental element in crime (No. 89). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  34. Low, P., Jeffries, J. & Bonnie, R. (1986). Criminal Law (2nd Ed.). Mineola, NY: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  35. McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987).Google Scholar
  36. McGillis, D. (1978). Attribution and the law: convergences between legal and psychological concepts. Law and Human Behavior, 2, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moore, M. (1984). Law and psychiatry: Rethinking the relationship. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Moore, M. (1985). Causation and the excuses. California Law Review, 73, 1091–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moore, M. (1987). The moral worth of retribution. In F. Schoeman (Ed.), Responsibility, character, and the emotions (pp. 179–219). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Moore, M. (1990). Choice, character, and excuse. Social Philosophy & Policy, 7, 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morris, N. (1982). Madness and the criminal law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Morse, S.J. (1979). Diminished capacity: A moral and legal conundrum. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 2, 271–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morse, S.J. (1984). Undiminished confusion in diminished capacity. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morse, S.J. (1985). Excusing the crazy: The insanity defense reconsidered. Southern California Law Review, 58, 777–837.Google Scholar
  45. Morse, S.J. (1986). Psychology, determinism, and legal responsibility. In G. Melton (Ed.), The law as a behavioral instrument, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 33, 1985, (pp. 35–85). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  46. Nisbett, R. & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference-Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  47. Office of the President (1989). National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  48. People v. Anderson, 70 Cal. 2d 15 (1968).Google Scholar
  49. People v. Conley, 64 Cal. 2d 310 (1966).Google Scholar
  50. People v. Hood, 1 Cal. 3d 444 (1969).Google Scholar
  51. People v. Jaffe, 185 N.Y. 497 (1906).Google Scholar
  52. People v. Rocha, 3 Cal. 3d 893 (1971).Google Scholar
  53. People v. Wetmore, 22 Cal. 3d 310 (1978).Google Scholar
  54. Regina v. Caldwell, 1 All E.R. 961 H.L. (1981).Google Scholar
  55. Regina v. Moloney, 1 All E.R. 1025 H.L. (1985).Google Scholar
  56. Regina v. Smith, 2 Q.B. 354 (1974).Google Scholar
  57. Robinson, P. (1984). Criminal law defenses (2 vols.). Minneapolis: West.Google Scholar
  58. Rosenberg, A. (1988). Philosophy of social science. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  59. Schoeman, F. (1979). On incapacitating the dangerous. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16, 27–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Schoeman, F. (1987). Statistical norms and moral attributions. In F. Schoeman (Ed.), Responsibility, character, and the emotions, (pp. 287–315). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Schulhofer, S. (1990). The gender question in criminal law. Social Philosophy & Policy, 7, 105–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Searle, J. (1984). Minds, brains and science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Shaver, K. (1985). The attribution of blame: causality, responsibility and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Skolnick, J. (1990). A critical look at the national drug control strategy. Yale Law & Policy Review, 8, 75–116.Google Scholar
  65. Smith, J.C. (1990). A note on “intention.” Criminal Law Review, 1990, 85–91.Google Scholar
  66. State v. Korell, 690 P. 2d 992 Mont. (1984).Google Scholar
  67. State v. Wilcox, 70 Ohio St. 2d 182 (1982).Google Scholar
  68. Stephen, J.F. (1890). A general view of the criminal law of England (2nd Ed.). London: Macmillan (repr. Littleton, CO: Fred B. Rothman & Co., 1985).Google Scholar
  69. Stich, S. (1983). From folk psychology to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. Sulzer, J. (1971). Heider’s “levels model” of responsibility attribution. Unpublished manuscript (quoted in Shaver 1985).Google Scholar
  71. Ten, C.L. (1987). Guilt and punishment: A philosophical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Trusted, J. (1987). Inquiry and understanding: An introduction to explanation in the physical and human sciences. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.Google Scholar
  73. United States Code (1988).Google Scholar
  74. United States v. Morissette, 342 U.S. 246 (1952).Google Scholar
  75. United States v. Park, 421 U.S. 658 (1975).Google Scholar
  76. Wertheimer, A. (1988). Coercion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Williams, G. (1961). Criminal law: The general part (2nd Ed.). London: Stevens & Sons.Google Scholar
  78. Williams, G. (1965). The mental element in crime. Jerusalem: The Magnes Press.Google Scholar
  79. Williams, G. (1978). Textbook of criminal law. London: Stevens & Sons.Google Scholar
  80. Wootton, B. (1963). Crime and the criminal law: Reflections of a magistrate and social scientist. London: Stevens & Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen J. Morse

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations