The SB (Sandwiched Beam) Technique for Pre-Cracking Brittle Materials

  • E. Trentini
  • V. M. Sglavo


The SB (sandwiched beam) methodology to introduce sharp through-thickness defects in brittle materials is described in this work. A notched bar is inserted between two support beams and the obtained sandwich is loaded in bending. In this configuration a crack can grow from the notch tip in a stable and controlled way, if appropriate experimental conditions are used. The obtained defects are suitable to measure fracture toughness; in fact, they are geometrically well defined and they are not associated to residual stress field. In addition it is possible to obtain cracks of different length that allow the evaluation of eventual toughening effects.


Fracture Toughness Stress Intensity Factor Strain Energy Release Short Crack Sandwich Beam 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. Lemaitre, R. Piller, Comparison of the Fracture Toughness of Alumina Measured by Three Different Methods, J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 7, 772–4 (1988).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Kurth, B. F. Lawlor, Y. J. Stockman, R. W. Steinbrech, Toughness Determination from Stable Growth of Long and Short Cracks in Si3N4 Ceramics, in: Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, Vol. 11, R. C. Bradt et al., ed., Plenum Press, New York, 151–162 (1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. M. Smith, R. O. Scattergood, Determination of Short-Crack Toughness Curves, J Am. Ceram. Soc., 79, 1, 129–36 (1996).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ASTM norm E 399–90, Standard Test Method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials, in: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 03.01, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 412–42 (1990).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. B. Watchman, Mechanical Properties of Ceramics, J. Wiley and sons, New York, NY, 6588 (1996).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. R. Lawn, Fracture of Brittle Solids - Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Nose, T. Fujii, Evaluation of Fracture Toughness for Ceramic Materials by a Single-Edge Precracked Beam Method, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 71, 5, 328–33 (1988).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. E. Srawley, Wide Range Stress Intensity Factor Expression for ASTM E399 Standard Fracture Toughness Specimens, Int. J. Fract., 12, 475–576 (1976).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. Murakami, Stress Intensity Factor Handbook, Vol. 1, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK (1987).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. E. Srawley, B. Gross, Cracks and Fracture, ASTM Special Publication n°601, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA (1976).Google Scholar
  11. V. M. Sglavo, P. Bosetti, E. Trentini, M. Ceschini, The SB (Sandwiched Beam) Procedure for Pre-Cracking Brittle Materials, accepted to be published by J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,(1999).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Engineered Materials Handbook - Ceramics and Glasses,Vol. 4, ASM International Handbook Committee, USA (1991).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Chantikul, S. Bennison and B. R. Lawn, Role of Grain Size in the Strength and R-Curve Properties of Alumina, J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 73, 8, 2419–27 (1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Trentini
    • 1
  • V. M. Sglavo
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria dei MaterialiUniversità di TrentoTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations