Hypertension

  • Stephen A. Brunton
  • Rita K. Edwards

Abstract

Despite widespread efforts to improve education and enhance public awareness, 30 million to 40 million of the approximately 60 million hypertensives in the United States remain undiagnosed or are inadequately treated (Table 78.1). Most have mild hypertension, and controversy still exists concerning the appropriate approach to these patients. Nonpharmacologic therapy is often the first choice, and this approach continues to evolve.1Of the 20 million to 30 million hypertensives who receive pharmacologic therapy, fewer than 50% adhere to their therapeutic regimen for more than 1 year, and 60% of these patients reduce the dosage of their drug owing to adverse effects. A negative impact on the patient’s quality of life may occur as a result of just making the diagnosis. Effects such as increased absenteeism, sickness behavior, hypochondria, and decreased self-esteem have been noted in cohorts of previously well individuals who have been told they were hypertensive.2A 1987 survey of physicians revealed that they regarded quality of life changes to be the primary impediment to effective pharmacologic treatment of hypertension.

Keywords

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patient Total Peripheral Resistance Life Style Modification Step Care Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    The Fifth Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National High Blood Pressure Education. National Institutes of Health. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. NIH Publication No. 93–1088. January 1993.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Taylor DW, Gibson ES, Johnson AL. Increased absenteeism from work after detection and labeling of hypertensive patients. N Engl J Med 1915;291:l41–4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gordon T, Doyle JT. Alcohol consumption and its relationship to smoking, weight, blood pressure, and blood lipids. Arch Intern Med 1986;146:262–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pooling Project Research Group. Relationship of blood pressure, serum cholesterol, smoking habit, relative weight and ECG abnormalities to incidence of major coronary events. J Chronic Dis 1978;31:201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stamler J, Farinaro E, Majonnier LM, et al. Prevention and control of hypertension by nutritional-hygienic means. JAMA 1980;243: 1819–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rose G, Stamler J. The Intersalt Study: background, methods and main results; Intersalt Cooperative Research Group. J Hum Hyper-tens 1989;3:283–8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cade R, Mars D, Wagemaker H, et al. Effect of aerobic exercise training on patients with systemic arterial hypertension. Am J Med 1984;77:785–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Margetts BM, Beilin LJ, Armstrong BK. A randomized control trial of a vegetarian diet in the treatment of mild hypertension. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1985;12:263–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaplan NM. Non-drug treatment of hypertension. Ann Intern Med 1985;102:359–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Witteman JC, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, et al. A prospective study of nutritional factors and hypertension among US women. Circulation 1989;80:1320–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patel C, Marmot MG. Stress management, blood pressure and quality of life. J Hypertens 1987;5 Suppl 1:521–8.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stamler R, Stamler J, Grimm R, et al. Nutritional therapy for high blood pressure. JAMA 1987;257:1484–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    American Hospital Formulary Service Drug Information. Bethesda: American Society of Hospital Pharmacists, 1990:939.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaplan NM. Clinical hypertension. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1993.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Houston MC. New insights and new approaches for the treatment of essential hypertension: selection of therapy based on coronary heart disease, risk factor analysis, hemodynamic profiles, quality of life and subsets of hypertension. Am Heart J 1989;117:911–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jachuck SJ, Brierly H, Jachuck S, et al. The effect of hypotensive drugs on quality of life. J R Coll Gen Pract 1982;32:103–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Croog SH, Levine S, Testa MA, et al. The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1657–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Steiner SS, Friedhoff AJ, Wilson BL, et al. Antihypertensive therapy and quality of life: a comparison of atenolol, Captopril, en-alapril and propranolol. J Hum Hypertens 1990;4:217–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen A. Brunton
  • Rita K. Edwards

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations