Abstract
It is difficult, at best, to define the scope of a specialty with flexible borders. The medical profession is used to, and is comfortable with, the relatively narrowly circumscribed borders of the subspecialties in medicine. Most neurosurgeons, for example, perform the same types of surgical procedures and have sharply demarcated boundaries beyond which they seldom stray. The opposite is true of family practice. One family physician may exclude obstetrics from his practice, while another enjoys a relatively large obstetrical practice, to cite one example. It is precisely these practice differences that have lead to confusion on the part of many of our medical colleagues as to the exclusive domain of medical knowledge to which family medicine lays claim. Because of these differences in practice, it is necessary to define the essence of this specialty, without which there would be no uniqueness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carmichael LP: Introduction to family medicine. In: Medalie JH (ed.) Family Medicine—Principles and Applications. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1978, p. 16.
American Academy of Family Physicians: Official Definition of Family Physician. AAFP reprint No. 303, 1975.
McWhinney IR: General practice as an academic discipline. Lancet 1: 419–23, 1966.
McWhinney IR: Beyond diagnosis: an approach to the integration of behavioral science and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med 287: 384–387, 1972.
Pellegrino ED: The academic viability of family medicine, a triad of challenges. JAMA 240: 132–35, 1978.
Hadac RR, Smith CK, Gordon MJ: Can continuity of medical care be taught? J Med Educ 54: 525–533, 1979.
Marsland DW, Wood M, Mayo F: A data bank for patient care, curriculum, and research in family practice: 526,196 patient problems. J Fam Pract 3: 25–28, 1976.
Stewart WL: Clinical implications of the Virginia study. J Fam Pract 3: 29–32, 1976.
Geyman JP: The family as the object of care in family practice. J Fam Pract 5: 571–575, 1977.
Hodgkin K: Educational implications of the Virginia study. J Fam Pract 3: 33–34, 1976.
McWhinney IR: Research implications of the Virginia study. J Fam Pract 3: 35–36, 1976.
Haller JA: Problems in children’s trauma. J Trauma 10: 269–271, 1970.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stewart, W.L. (1983). Clinical Data Base: The Scope of Family Medicine. In: Taylor, R.B. (eds) Family Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4002-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4002-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4004-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4002-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive