Skip to main content

Clinical Data Base: The Scope of Family Medicine

  • Chapter
Book cover Family Medicine
  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

It is difficult, at best, to define the scope of a specialty with flexible borders. The medical profession is used to, and is comfortable with, the relatively narrowly circumscribed borders of the subspecialties in medicine. Most neurosurgeons, for example, perform the same types of surgical procedures and have sharply demarcated boundaries beyond which they seldom stray. The opposite is true of family practice. One family physician may exclude obstetrics from his practice, while another enjoys a relatively large obstetrical practice, to cite one example. It is precisely these practice differences that have lead to confusion on the part of many of our medical colleagues as to the exclusive domain of medical knowledge to which family medicine lays claim. Because of these differences in practice, it is necessary to define the essence of this specialty, without which there would be no uniqueness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carmichael LP: Introduction to family medicine. In: Medalie JH (ed.) Family Medicine—Principles and Applications. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1978, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Academy of Family Physicians: Official Definition of Family Physician. AAFP reprint No. 303, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McWhinney IR: General practice as an academic discipline. Lancet 1: 419–23, 1966.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McWhinney IR: Beyond diagnosis: an approach to the integration of behavioral science and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med 287: 384–387, 1972.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pellegrino ED: The academic viability of family medicine, a triad of challenges. JAMA 240: 132–35, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hadac RR, Smith CK, Gordon MJ: Can continuity of medical care be taught? J Med Educ 54: 525–533, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Marsland DW, Wood M, Mayo F: A data bank for patient care, curriculum, and research in family practice: 526,196 patient problems. J Fam Pract 3: 25–28, 1976.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stewart WL: Clinical implications of the Virginia study. J Fam Pract 3: 29–32, 1976.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Geyman JP: The family as the object of care in family practice. J Fam Pract 5: 571–575, 1977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hodgkin K: Educational implications of the Virginia study. J Fam Pract 3: 33–34, 1976.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McWhinney IR: Research implications of the Virginia study. J Fam Pract 3: 35–36, 1976.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haller JA: Problems in children’s trauma. J Trauma 10: 269–271, 1970.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stewart, W.L. (1983). Clinical Data Base: The Scope of Family Medicine. In: Taylor, R.B. (eds) Family Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4002-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4002-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4004-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4002-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics