Family Medicine pp 1133-1157 | Cite as

Record and Code Systems

  • Herbert T. Smith


Recently a family practice resident returned from a twomonth rural preceptorship and his evaluation of the physician and his practice was as follows: “I had the opportunity to see a lot of patients, observe a plethora of pathology, and do a lot of family practice you don’t see in a city, but the way he ran his office and his medical record system was mayhem.” The resident was saying, in effect, “The practice was running the physician, rather than the physician running the practice.”


Family Physician Code System Family Practice American Hospital Association Pityriasis Rosea 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barnett GO: Costar: Computer-Stored Ambulatory Record—A Progress Report. Massachusetts General HospitalGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bass MJ, Newell JP, Dickie GL: An information system for family practice, Part I: Defining the practice population. J Fam Prac 3 :517, 1976Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bass MJ, Newell JP, Dickie GL: An information system for family practice, Part II: The value of defining a practice population. J Fam Prac 3:525, 1976Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brandejs JF, Kasowski MA, Pace G: Information systerns, Part II: The medical record. CMA J 113:903, 1975Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brandejs JF, Kasowski MA, Doyle CE: Information systems, Part III: Methodology and long-term applications. CMA J 113 : 1006, 1975Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brandejs JF, Kasowski MA: Information systems, Part IV: Protection of health care confidentiality. CMA J 113:1101, 1975Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brandejs JF, Kasowski MA, Murray HO: Information systems, Part V: What the users think. CMA J 114: 68–76, 1976Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brandejs JF, Kasowski MA, Davis NWL: Information systems, Part VI: What the computer can do for the primary care physician. CMA J 114:170, 1976Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brandejs JF, Kasowski MA, Fortin LJ: Information systems, Part VII: Problem-oriented medical records for family practice. CMA J 114 : 371,174,384, 1976Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coburn HN, Baker PM: Health hazard appraisal—A possible tool in health protection and promotion, Can JPH 64:490, 1973Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cromwell L, Andritti M, Weibell FJ, Pfeiffer EA, Steele B, Labok J: Medical Instrumentation for Health Care. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1976Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: Symptom Classification, DHEW Publication No. (HRA) 74. Rockville, Md, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Health Resources Administration, National Center for Health Statistics, May 1974Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dinsdale SM, Gent M, Kline G, Milner R: Problemoriented medical records: Their impact on staff communication, attitudes and decision making. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 56:269, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Driggs MF: Problem-directed and medical information systems (Selected papers and discussion from the fourth annual scientific meeting of the Society for Advanced Medical Systems (SASM) held in Saddle Brook, New Jersey). New York, Intercontinental Medical Book Corporation, 1973Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fries JF: Alternatives in medical record formats. Med Care 12:876, 1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giebink GA, Hurst LL: Computer Projects in Health Care. Ann Arbor, Michigan, Health Administration Press, 1975Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grace NT, Neal EM, Wellock CE, Pile DD: The family-oriented medical record. J Fam Prac 4:19, 1977Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jackson CB Jr, Drueger DE, Densen PM: Ambulatory care medical records: Uniform minimum basic data set. JAMA 234:1245, 1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ladou J, Sherwood JM, Hughes L: Health hazard appraisal in patient counseling (Preventive Medicine). West J Med 122:177, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ludwig H: Computer Applications and Techniques in Clinical Medicine. New York, John Wiley, 1974Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luff CA, Walker PC: A computer code for the recording of patients’ problem. Computers and Biomedical Research 8:267, 1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Manning PR: The problem-oriented record as a tool in management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 18:175, 1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McCulloch W: Prospective medicine—improving the patient’s survival odds. Am Med News, September 2, 1974, p 21Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    McDonald CJ: Use of a computer to detect and respond to clinical events: Its effect on clinician behavior. Intern Med 84 :162, 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mesel E, Wirtschafter DD: On-line Medicaid Billing System for Physicians’ Services 8:479, 1975Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mesel E, Wirtschafter DD: Automation of a patient medical profile from insurance claims data: A possible first step in automating ambulatory medical records on at national scale. MMFQ, Health Soc, Winter 1976, p 29Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mesel E, Wirtschafter DD: Editorial: Automating ambulatory medical records: A claims-based medical profile. Comput Biomed Res 9:89, 1976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morrison CC: The computer in family practice. J Maine Med Assoc, October 1973, p 56Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morrison CC: Pioneering with computers in family medicine. Patient Care, March 1, 1974, p 71Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Newell JP, Dickie GL, Bass MJ: An information system for family practice, Part 3: Gathering encounter data. J Fam Prac 3:633, 1976Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Payne RF: The computer as a tool in clinical medicine. South Med J 64:1216, 1971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Paymond S: Criteria in the choice of a computer systern, Part II: The computer in practice. JAMA 228: 1015, 1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rakel RE: The problem-oriented medical record (POMR). AFP 10:100, 1972Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Renner JH, Bauman EA: Problem-specific coding systems. J Fam Prac 2:279, 1975Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Robbins LC, Hall JH: How to Practice Prospective Medicine. Indianapolis, Ind, Methodist Hospital of Indiana, 1970Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schmidt EC, Schall DW, Morrison CC: Computerized problem-oriented medical record for ambulatory practice. Med Care 12:316, 1974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schneeweiss R, Stuart HW, Froom J, Wood M, Tindall H, Williamson JD: A conversion code from the RCGP to the ICHPPC classification system. J Fam Prac 5:415, 1977Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schneider D, Appleton L: A reason for visit classification system for ambulatory care. Med Rec News, October 1976, p 59Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tharp R: Records that let me see 50 percent more patients. Med Econ, February 23, 1976, p 72Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    The International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care. Chicago, American Hospital Association, 1975Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Thompson HC, Osborne CE: Office records in the evaluation of quality of care. Med Care 14:294, 1976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Walker HK: Commentary: The problem orientedmedical system. JAMA 236:2397, 1976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Herbert T. Smith

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations