Skip to main content

Multiple person dimensions and latent item predictors

  • Chapter
Book cover Explanatory Item Response Models

Part of the book series: Statistics for Social Science and Public Policy ((SSBS))

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss two extensions to the item response models presented in the first two parts of this book: more than one random effect for persons (multidimensionality) and latent item predictors. We only consider models with random person weights (following a normal distribution), and with no inclusion of person predictors (except for the constant). The extensions can be applied in much the same way to the other models that were discussed in the first two parts of this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackerman, T. (1992). A didactic explanation of item bias, item impact, and item validity from a multidimensional perspective. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, T. (1994). Using multidimensional item response theory to understand what items and tests are measuring. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R.J., Wilson, M., & Wang, W.-C. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F.M. Lord & M.R. Novick (Eds). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (pp. 397–479). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R.D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: An application of an EM-algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443–459.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R.D., Gibbons, R., & Muraki, E. (1988). Full-information item factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butter, R., De Boeck, P., & Verhelst, N. (1998). An item response model with internal restrictions on item difficulty. Psychometrika, 63, 47–63.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersson, A. (1975). Factor analysis of dichotomized variables. Psychometrika, 40, 5–22.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S.E. (1991). A multidimensional latent trait model for measuring learning and change. Psychometrika, 56, 495–515.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G.H. (1973). Linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research. Acta Psychologica, 37, 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folk, V.G., & Green, B.F. (1989). Adaptive estimation when the unidimen-sionality assumption of IRT is violated. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, C., & McDonald, R. (1986). NOHARM II: A FORTRAN program for fitting unidimensional and multidimensional normal ogive models of latent trait theory. Armidale, NSW, Australia: University of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelderman, H. (1997). Loglinear multidimensional item response models for polytomously scored items. In W. van der Linden & R. Hambleton (Eds), Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory (pp. 287–304). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kelderman, H., & Rijkes, C.P.M. (1994). Loglinear multidimensional IRT models for polytomously scored items. Psychometrika, 59, 149–176.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Knol, D. & Berger, M. (1991). Empirical comparison between factor analysis and multidimensional item response models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 457–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupermintz, H., Ennis, M.M., Hamilton, L.S., Talbert, J.E., & Snow, R.E. (1995). Enhancing the validity and usefulness of large-scale educational assessments.1. Nels-88 Mathematics Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 525–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luecht, R.M., & Miller, R. (1992). Unidimensional calibrations and interpretations of composite traits for multidimensional tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R.R (1967). Nonlinear factor analysis. Psychometric Monographs, No. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R.P. (1997). Normal-ogive multidimensional model. In W.J. van der Linden & R.K. Hambleton (Eds). Handbook of Modern Rem Response Theory (pp.257–269). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, R.L. (1989). Confirmatory analysis of test structure using multidimensional item response theory. Research Report No. RR-89–31, Princeton, NJ: ETS.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, R.L., & Reckase, M.D. (1983). MAXLOG: A computer program for the estimation of the parameters of a multidimensional logistic model. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 15, 389–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muraki, E. & Carlson, J.E. (1995). Full-information factor analysis for polytomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B.O. (1978). Contributions to factor analysis of dichotomous variables. Psychometrika, 43, 551–560.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Reckase, M.D. (1997). A linear logistic multidimensional model for dichotomous item response data. In W. van der Linden & R. Hambleton (Eds), Handbook of Modern Rem Response Theory (pp. 271–286). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rijmen, F., & De Boeck, P. (2002). The random weights linear logistic test model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (1997). Linear Mixed Models in Practice: A SAS-Oriented Approach. New York: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C.M., & Beretvas, S.N. (2000). Using multidimensional versus unidimensional ability estimates to determine student proficiency in mathematics. Paper presented at the 2000 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W.-C., Wilson, M., & Adams, R.J. (1997). Rasch models for multidi-mensionality between items and within items. In M. Wilson, K. Draney, & G. Eglehard (Eds), Objective Measurement (Vol. 4,). Norwood, NY: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., Wood, R. & Gibbons, R. (1984). TESTFACT. Test Scoring, Item Statistics and Item Factor Analysis [Computer software and manual]. Mooreville, IN: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rijmen, F., Briggs, D. (2004). Multiple person dimensions and latent item predictors. In: De Boeck, P., Wilson, M. (eds) Explanatory Item Response Models. Statistics for Social Science and Public Policy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3990-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3990-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-2323-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3990-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics