Abstract
In this chapter we present four item response models. These four models are comparatively simple within the full range of models in this volume, but some of them are more complex than the common item response models. On the one hand, all four models provide a measurement of individual differences, but on the other hand we use the models to demonstrate how the effect of person characteristics and of item design factors can be investigated. The models range from descriptive measurement for the case where no such effects are investigated, to explanatory measurement for the case where person properties and/or item properties are used to explain the effects of persons and/or items.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, R.J., Wilson, M., & Wang, W. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 1–23.
Adams, R.J., Wilson, M., & Wu, M. (1997). Multilevel item response models: An approach to errors in variables regression. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 47–76.
Akaike, M. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.
Andersen, E.B., & Olsen, L.W. (2001). The life of Georg Rasch as a mathematician and as a statistician. In A. Boomsma, M. A. J van Duijn & T.A.B. Snijders (Eds), Essays on Item Response Theory (pp. 3–24). New-York: Springer.
Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F.M. Lord & M.R. Novick (Eds), Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (pp. 394–479). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bock, R.D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: An application of the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443–459.
Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2001). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in Human Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection for Akaike’s information criterion (AIC). Psychometrika, 53, 345–370.
de Leeuw, J., & Verhelst, N. (1986). Maximum-likelihood estimation in generalized Rasch models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 183–196.
Fischer, G.H. (1968). Neue Entwicklungen in der psychologischen Testtheorie. In G.H. Fischer (Ed.), Psychologische Testtheorie (pp. 15–158). Bern: Huber.
Fischer, G.H. (1973). The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research. Acta Psychologica, 3, 359–374.
Fischer, G.H. (1974). Einführung in die Theorie Psychologischer Tests. Bern: Huber.
Fischer, G.H. (1977). Linear logistic trait models: Theory and application. In H. Spada & W.F. Kampf (Eds), Structural Models of Thinking and Learning (pp. 203–225). Bern: Huber.
Fischer, G.H. (1981). On the existence and uniqueness of maximum-likelihood estimates in the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 46, 59–77.
Fischer, G.H. (1983). Logistic latent trait models with linear constraints. Psychometrika, 48, 3–26.
Fischer, G.H. (1989). An IRT-based model for dichotomous longitudinal data. Psychometrika, 54, 599–624.
Fischer, G.H. (1995). Linear logistic models for change. In G.H. Fischer & I. Molenaar (Eds), Rasch Models. Foundations, Recent Developments and Applications (pp. 157–201). New York: Springer.
Fischer, G.H., & Molenaar, I. (1995) (Eds), Rasch Models. Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications. New York: Springer.
Follmann, D.A. (1988). Consistent estimation in the Rasch model based on nonparametric margins. Psychometrika, 53, 553–562.
Fox, J.P., & Glas, C.A.W. (2003). Bayesian modeling of measurement error in predictor variables using item response theory. Psychometrika, 68, 169–191.
Hoijtink, H., & Boomsma, A. (1995). On person parameter estimation in the dichotomous Rasch Model. In G.H. Fischer & I. Molenaar (Eds), Rasch Models. Foundations, Recent Developments and Applications (pp. 53–68). New York: Springer.
Junker, B., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Nonparametric item response theory. Special issue. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25.
Masters, G.N., Adams, R.A., & Wilson, M. (1990). Charting of student progress. In T. Husen & T.N. Postlewaite (Eds), International Encyclopedia of Education: Research and Studies. Supplementary Volume 2. (pp. 628–634) Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality Assessment. New York: Wiley, 1968.
Mislevy, R.J. (1987). Exploiting auxiliary information about examinees in the estimation of item parameters. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 81–91.
Molenaar, I. (1995). Estimation of item parameters. In G.H. Fischer & I. Molenaar (Eds), Rasch Models. Foundations, Recent Developments and Applications (pp. 39–57). New York: Springer.
Rabe-Hesketh, S., Pickles, A., & Skrondal, A. (2001). GLLAMM Manual. Technical Report 2001/01. Department of Biostatistics and Computing, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College, University of London.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
Rasch, G. (1961). On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Theory of Probability (Vol. IV, pp. 321–333). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Rasch, G. (1967). An informal report on a theory of objectivity in comparisons. In L.J.Th. van der Kamp & C.A.J. Vlek (Eds), Psychological Measurement Theory (pp. 1–19). Proceedings of The NUFFIC international summer session. Leiden: University of Leiden.
Read, T.R.C., & Cressie, N.A.C. (1988). Goodness-of-fit Statistics for Discrete Multivariate Data. New York: Springer.
Rost, J. (2001). The growing family of Rasch models. In A. Boomsma, M.A.J van Duijn & T.A.B. Snijders (Eds), Essays on Item Response theory (pp. 25–42). New York: Springer.
SAS Institute (1999). SAS OnlineDoc (Version 8) (software manual on CD-ROM). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Scheiblechner, H. (1972). Das Lernen and Lösen komplexer Denkaufgaben. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 3, 456–506.
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. (2002). Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel Analysis. London: Sage.
Thissen, D., & Orlando, M. (2001). Item response theory for items scored in two categories. In D. Thissen & H. Wainer (Eds), Test Scoring (pp. 73–140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Verbeke, C., & Molenberghs, G. (2000). Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. New York: Springer.
Verhelst, N.D., & Eggen, T.J.H.M. (1989). Psychometrische en statistische aspecten van peilingsonderzoek (PPON rapport 4). Arnhem: Cito.
Verhelst, N.D., & Glas, C.A.W. (1995). The one parameter logistic model. In G.H. Fisher & I. Molenaar (Eds), Rasch Models. Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications (pp. 215–237). New York: Springer.
Wainer, H., Vevea, J.L., Camacho, F., Reeve, B.B., Rosa, K., Nelson, L., Swygert, K., & Thissen, D. (2001). Augmented scores — “Borrowing strength” to compute scores based on small numbers of items. In D. Thissen & H. Wainer (Eds), Test Scoring (pp. 343–387). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wald, A. (1941). Asymptotically most powerful tests of statistical hypotheses. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 12, 1–19.
Warm, T.A. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response models. Psychometrika, 54, 427–450
Wilson, M. (2003). On choosing a model for measuring. Methods of Psychological Research — Online, 8(3), 1–22.
Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing Measures: An Item Modeling Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wright, B. (1968). Sample-free test calibration and person measurement. Proceedings 1967 Invitational Conference on Testing (pp. 85–101). Princeton: ETS.
Wright, B. (1977). Solving measurement problems with the Rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 97–116.
Wright, B. (1997). A history of social science measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16, 33–52.
Wright, B., & Stone, M. (1979). Best Test Design. Chicago, IL: MESA.
Wu, M.L., Adams, R.J., & Wilson, M. (1998). ACERConquest Hawthorn, Australia: ACER Press.
Zwinderman, A.H. (1991). A generalized Rasch model for manifest predictors. Psychometrika, 56, 589–600.
Zwinderman, A.H. (1997). Response models with manifest predictors. In W.J. van der Linden & R.K. Hambleton (Eds), Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory (pp. 245–256). New York: Springer.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilson, M., De Boeck, P. (2004). Descriptive and explanatory item response models. In: De Boeck, P., Wilson, M. (eds) Explanatory Item Response Models. Statistics for Social Science and Public Policy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3990-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3990-9_2
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-2323-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3990-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive