Skip to main content

Peritoneography: Normal and Pathologic Anatomy

  • Chapter

Abstract

Plain film identification of intraperitoneal structures is generally limited to those aspects outlined by contrasting extraperitoneal fat or naturally occurring intraluminal gas. The demonstration of abdominal masses by gastrointestinal series and barium enema examination requires mucosal alterations or bowel displacement. These routine contrast studies of the intestinal tract permit visualization of its internal mucosal contour alone. An outstanding limitation is the inability to accurately evaluate the thickness of the bowel wall. Only indirect signs must be relied upon for the radiologic diagnosis of mural or serosal disease. The classic radiologic differential diagnosis between mucosal, submucosal (intramural), and extrinsic lesions is a distinction made on indirect signs only, based upon the contours of a defect. Terminology includes such descriptions as “mural defect”, yet the actual wall of the structure studied is rarely visualized radiologically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almond CH, Cochran DQ, Shucart WA: Comparative study of effects of various radiographic contrast media on peritoneal cavity. Ann Surg Suppl 154:219–224, 1961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bétoulières P, Jaumes F, Voisin G, et al: Péritoneographie opaque susmésocolique. J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl 42:611–615, 1961

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Birzle H: 1st Péritoneographie als röntgenologische Untersuchungsmethode möglich und brauchbar? Fortschr Geb Roentgenstr Nuklearmed 95:824–829, 1961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Doench K, Frischkorn R, Rosenow U: Die Péritoneographie mit Uro vison vor der Radiogoldapplikation. Fortschr Roentgenostr 118:413–417, 1973

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ducharme JC, Bertrand R, Chacar R: Is it possible to diagnose inguinal hernia by x-ray? Preliminary report on herniography. J Can Ass Radiolo 18:448–451, 1967

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferris EJ, Spira J, McCutcheon E, et al: Transuterine infusion of red cells into fetus in erythroblastosis fetalis. Radiology 84:40–42, 1965

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frimann-Dahl J, Traetteberg K: Parietography of stomach. Br J Radiol 35:249–254, 1962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gelfand DW: Positive contrast peritoneography: Anatomy of normal abdomen. Med Radiol Photogr 45:30–39, 1969

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gelfand DW: Positive peritoneography: The abnormal abdomen. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 119:190–197, 1973

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Griscom NT, Harris GBC, Umansky I, et al: Internal radiographic anatomy of intrauterine fetus, Progress in Pediatric Radiology. Vol 2. Genitourinary Tract. Edited by HJ Kaufman. Yearbook Publishers Inc, Chicago, 1970, pp 344–371

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keettel WC, Fox MR, Longnecker DS, et al: Prophylactic use of radioactive gold in treatment of primary ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 94:766–779, 1966

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kruger S, Grève DW, Schueller FW: Absorption of fluid from peritoneal cavity. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 137:173–176, 1962

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindgren I, Nagy EJ, Virtama P: Drainage of radiographic contrast media from abdominal cavity: Experimental studies in rats. Acta Radiol Diagn 7:481–488, 1968

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Margulis AR, Burhenne HJ, Rambo ON: Evaluation of celiography in rats. Radiology 82:290–295, 1964

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Margulis AR, Cook GB, Tucker GL, et al: Celiography with iothalamic acid: Experimental studies in dogs and rats. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 90:723–726, 1963

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McAlister WH, Shackelford GD, Kissane J: The histologic effects of some iodine-containing contrast media on the rat peritoneal cavity. Radiology 105:581–582, 1972

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Meyers HI, Jacobson G: Use of water-soluble contrast medium in suspected perforated peptic ulcer. Radiol Clin N Am 2:55–69, 1964

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Meyers MA: Spread and localization of acute intraperitoneal effusions. Radiology 95:547–554, 1970

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Meyers MA: Peritoneography: New radiographic method for evaluation of peritoneal cavity and its contents. Invest Radiol 5:273, 1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meyers MA: Peritoneography: Normal and pathologic anatomy. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 117:353–365, 1973

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Meyers MA, Young SW, Hakkal HG: Peritoneography: Demonstration of normal and abnormal mural thickness. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 122:281–287, 1974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Meyers MA : Clinical report : A new view of the peritoneal cavity. Mod Med 44(6):51–56, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  23. O’Connor JF, Neuhauser EBD: Total body opacification in conventional and high dose urography in infancy. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 90:63–71, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oh KS, Dorst JP, White JJ, et al: Positive-contrast peritoneography and herniography. Radiology 108:647–654, 1973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Piro AJ, Hall TC, Lewis JL,Jr, et al: Use of intracavity contrast media in patient with neoplastic effusions. JAMA 206:821–824, 1968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rollino A: Studi sperimentali sulla peritoneografia. I. Valore della peritoneografia come mezzo di indagine. Minerva Chir (Torino) 11:230–234, 1956

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rudy RL, Bhargava AK, Roenigk WJ: Contrast pleurography: New technique for radiographic visualization of pleura and its various reflections in dogs. Radiology 91:1034–1036, 1968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sternhill V, Schwartz S: Effect of Hypaque on mouse peritoneum. Radiology 75:811–814, I960

    Google Scholar 

  29. Swischuk LE, Stacy TM: Herniography: Radiologic investigation of inguinal hernia. Radiology 101:139–146, 1971

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Trimble C, Pomerantz M, Eiseman B: Sinography of abdominal stab wounds. Am J Surg 117:426–429, 1969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wittman I: Peritoneoscopy. 2 volumes. Akadémiai Kiadô, Publishing House of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, 1966

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meyers, M.A. (1976). Peritoneography: Normal and Pathologic Anatomy. In: Dynamic Radiology of the Abdomen. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3955-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3955-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-3957-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3955-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics