Abstract
Plain film identification of intraperitoneal structures is generally limited to those aspects outlined by contrasting extraperitoneal fat or naturally occurring intraluminal gas. The demonstration of abdominal masses by gastrointestinal series and barium enema examination requires mucosal alterations or bowel displacement. These routine contrast studies of the intestinal tract permit visualization of its internal mucosal contour alone. An outstanding limitation is the inability to accurately evaluate the thickness of the bowel wall. Only indirect signs must be relied upon for the radiologic diagnosis of mural or serosal disease. The classic radiologic differential diagnosis between mucosal, submucosal (intramural), and extrinsic lesions is a distinction made on indirect signs only, based upon the contours of a defect. Terminology includes such descriptions as “mural defect”, yet the actual wall of the structure studied is rarely visualized radiologically.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Almond CH, Cochran DQ, Shucart WA: Comparative study of effects of various radiographic contrast media on peritoneal cavity. Ann Surg Suppl 154:219–224, 1961
Bétoulières P, Jaumes F, Voisin G, et al: Péritoneographie opaque susmésocolique. J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl 42:611–615, 1961
Birzle H: 1st Péritoneographie als röntgenologische Untersuchungsmethode möglich und brauchbar? Fortschr Geb Roentgenstr Nuklearmed 95:824–829, 1961
Doench K, Frischkorn R, Rosenow U: Die Péritoneographie mit Uro vison vor der Radiogoldapplikation. Fortschr Roentgenostr 118:413–417, 1973
Ducharme JC, Bertrand R, Chacar R: Is it possible to diagnose inguinal hernia by x-ray? Preliminary report on herniography. J Can Ass Radiolo 18:448–451, 1967
Ferris EJ, Spira J, McCutcheon E, et al: Transuterine infusion of red cells into fetus in erythroblastosis fetalis. Radiology 84:40–42, 1965
Frimann-Dahl J, Traetteberg K: Parietography of stomach. Br J Radiol 35:249–254, 1962
Gelfand DW: Positive contrast peritoneography: Anatomy of normal abdomen. Med Radiol Photogr 45:30–39, 1969
Gelfand DW: Positive peritoneography: The abnormal abdomen. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 119:190–197, 1973
Griscom NT, Harris GBC, Umansky I, et al: Internal radiographic anatomy of intrauterine fetus, Progress in Pediatric Radiology. Vol 2. Genitourinary Tract. Edited by HJ Kaufman. Yearbook Publishers Inc, Chicago, 1970, pp 344–371
Keettel WC, Fox MR, Longnecker DS, et al: Prophylactic use of radioactive gold in treatment of primary ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 94:766–779, 1966
Kruger S, Grève DW, Schueller FW: Absorption of fluid from peritoneal cavity. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 137:173–176, 1962
Lindgren I, Nagy EJ, Virtama P: Drainage of radiographic contrast media from abdominal cavity: Experimental studies in rats. Acta Radiol Diagn 7:481–488, 1968
Margulis AR, Burhenne HJ, Rambo ON: Evaluation of celiography in rats. Radiology 82:290–295, 1964
Margulis AR, Cook GB, Tucker GL, et al: Celiography with iothalamic acid: Experimental studies in dogs and rats. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 90:723–726, 1963
McAlister WH, Shackelford GD, Kissane J: The histologic effects of some iodine-containing contrast media on the rat peritoneal cavity. Radiology 105:581–582, 1972
Meyers HI, Jacobson G: Use of water-soluble contrast medium in suspected perforated peptic ulcer. Radiol Clin N Am 2:55–69, 1964
Meyers MA: Spread and localization of acute intraperitoneal effusions. Radiology 95:547–554, 1970
Meyers MA: Peritoneography: New radiographic method for evaluation of peritoneal cavity and its contents. Invest Radiol 5:273, 1970
Meyers MA: Peritoneography: Normal and pathologic anatomy. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 117:353–365, 1973
Meyers MA, Young SW, Hakkal HG: Peritoneography: Demonstration of normal and abnormal mural thickness. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 122:281–287, 1974
Meyers MA : Clinical report : A new view of the peritoneal cavity. Mod Med 44(6):51–56, 1976
O’Connor JF, Neuhauser EBD: Total body opacification in conventional and high dose urography in infancy. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 90:63–71, 1963
Oh KS, Dorst JP, White JJ, et al: Positive-contrast peritoneography and herniography. Radiology 108:647–654, 1973
Piro AJ, Hall TC, Lewis JL,Jr, et al: Use of intracavity contrast media in patient with neoplastic effusions. JAMA 206:821–824, 1968
Rollino A: Studi sperimentali sulla peritoneografia. I. Valore della peritoneografia come mezzo di indagine. Minerva Chir (Torino) 11:230–234, 1956
Rudy RL, Bhargava AK, Roenigk WJ: Contrast pleurography: New technique for radiographic visualization of pleura and its various reflections in dogs. Radiology 91:1034–1036, 1968
Sternhill V, Schwartz S: Effect of Hypaque on mouse peritoneum. Radiology 75:811–814, I960
Swischuk LE, Stacy TM: Herniography: Radiologic investigation of inguinal hernia. Radiology 101:139–146, 1971
Trimble C, Pomerantz M, Eiseman B: Sinography of abdominal stab wounds. Am J Surg 117:426–429, 1969
Wittman I: Peritoneoscopy. 2 volumes. Akadémiai Kiadô, Publishing House of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, 1966
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meyers, M.A. (1976). Peritoneography: Normal and Pathologic Anatomy. In: Dynamic Radiology of the Abdomen. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3955-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3955-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-3957-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3955-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive