Skip to main content

PatientSite: Patient-Centered Communication, Services, and Access to Information

  • Chapter
Consumer Informatics

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

Abstract

Healthcare providers are not meeting the needs of online consumers. Over half the U.S. population is currently online and the place they turn for health information, after their doctors, is the Internet1 (Fig. 2.1). In another survey, Internet users were almost as likely to turn to the Internet for healthcare information as they were their physician.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Manhattan Research, LLC. CyberCitizen Health v2. 0. New York: Manhattan Research, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Horrigan JB, Rainie L. Counting on the Internet. Washington, DC:,Pew Internet and American Life Project, December 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harris Interactive. No significant change in the number of “cyber-chondriacs”—those who go online for health care information. Health Care News 2003; 3: 4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harris Interactive. Patient/physician online communication: many patients want it, would pay for it, and it would influence their choice of doctors and health plans. Health Care News 2002; 2: 8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Manhattan Research, LLC. Taking the Pulse v2. 0. New York: Manhattan Research, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kane B, Sands DZ for the AMIA Internet Working Group, Task Force on Guidelines for the Use of Clinic-Patient Electronic Mail. Guidelines for the clinical use of electronic mail with patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5: 104–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bleich HL, Beckley RF, Horowitz G, et al. Clinical computing in a teaching hospital. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 756–764.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Safran C, Slack WV, Bleich HL. Role of computing in patient care in two hospitals. MD Comput 1989; 6: 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Safran C, Sands DZ, Rind DM. Online medical records: a decade of experience. Methods Inform Med 1999; 38: 308–312.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Slack WV, Slack CW. Patient-computer dialogue. N Engl J Med 1972; 286: 1304–1309.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fishbach RL, Sionelo-Bayog A, Needle A, Delbanco TL. The patient and practitioner as co-authors of the medical record. Patient Couns Health Educ 1980; 2 (1): 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mukamal KJ, Smetana GW, Delbanco T. Clinicians, educators, and investigators in general internal medicine: bridging the gaps. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17 (7): 565–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clifford JC, Horvath J, eds. Advancing professional nursing practice: innovations and Boston’s Beth Israel Hospital. New York: Springer, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beatrice DF, Thomas CP, Biles B. Grant making with an impact: the Picker/Commonwealth Patient-Centered Care Program. Health Affairs 1998; 17: 236–244.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kantz B, Wandel J, Fladger A, Folcarelli P, Burger S, Clifford JC. Developing patient and family education services: innovations for the changing healthcare environment. J Nurs Admin 1998; 28: 2, 11–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sands DZ, Halamka JD, PelEaton D. PatientSite: a Web-based clinical communication and health education tool. Health Information Management Systems Society annual conference, Chicago, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Halamka JD, Szolovits P, Rind D, Safran C. A WWW implementation of national recommendations for protecting electronic health information. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 4 (6): 458–464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Masys DR, Baker DB. Patient-Centered Access to Secure Systems Online (PCASSO): 8a secure approach to clinical data access via the World Wide Web. Proc AMIA Annual Fall Symposium 1997; 340–343.

    Google Scholar 

  19. http://www.rsasecurity.com/products/securid/tokens.html 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Slack WV, Bleich HL. The CCC system in two teaching hospitals: a progress report. Int J Med Inform 1999; 54: 183–196.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Slack WV. Cybermedicine: how computing empowers doctors and patients for better health care (revised and updated edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sands, D.Z., Halamka, J.D. (2004). PatientSite: Patient-Centered Communication, Services, and Access to Information. In: Nelson, R., Ball, M.J. (eds) Consumer Informatics. Health Informatics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3920-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3920-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-2336-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3920-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics