Skip to main content

Clinical Assessment in Forensic Settings

  • Chapter
Introduction to Forensic Psychology

Abstract

The above cross-examination is typical of what a forensic expert witness can expect to face when testifying to the conclusions about a person’s behavior being consistent with what is expected for someone with a particular type of mental illness. If you only used a standard clinical evaluation as your data source, which may be appropriate in an initial clinical interview to develop a treatment plan, a forensic examiner is at a disadvantage. If you also administered several clinical tests to assess for mental illness, the forensic examiner can more effectively deal with the obvious question of the client’s inconsistent behavior, such as outright lying or pretending to feign psychopathology. However, if you also review documents such as police reports and witness statements that describe the client’s behavior at the time of the incident, then you can make statements that support your opinion. The more data sources you have, the more credible is the forensic opinion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  • Frederick, R. (1997). The validity indicator profile: Professional manual. Minnesota: National Computer Systems/Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (1997). Instruments for understanding and assessing comprehension of Miranda rights: Professional manual. Florida: Professional Resource Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, K. (2002). Forensic mental health assessment. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoge, S.K., Bonnie, R.J., Poythress, N.G., Monahan, J. (1997). MacArthur Competency Assessment Tool for Criminal Adjudication (MacCAT-CA). Lutz, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (1992). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS): Professional manual. Lutz, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D.L. (2001). Criminal responsibility. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resources Press. Shapiro, D.L. (1990). Forensic psychological assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh, T.N. (1996) Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Professional manual. Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walker, L.E.A., Shapiro, D.L. (2003). Clinical Assessment in Forensic Settings. In: Introduction to Forensic Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3795-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3795-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3421-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3795-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics