Abstract
The above cross-examination is typical of what a forensic expert witness can expect to face when testifying to the conclusions about a person’s behavior being consistent with what is expected for someone with a particular type of mental illness. If you only used a standard clinical evaluation as your data source, which may be appropriate in an initial clinical interview to develop a treatment plan, a forensic examiner is at a disadvantage. If you also administered several clinical tests to assess for mental illness, the forensic examiner can more effectively deal with the obvious question of the client’s inconsistent behavior, such as outright lying or pretending to feign psychopathology. However, if you also review documents such as police reports and witness statements that describe the client’s behavior at the time of the incident, then you can make statements that support your opinion. The more data sources you have, the more credible is the forensic opinion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
Frederick, R. (1997). The validity indicator profile: Professional manual. Minnesota: National Computer Systems/Pearson.
Grisso, T. (1997). Instruments for understanding and assessing comprehension of Miranda rights: Professional manual. Florida: Professional Resource Press.
Heilbrun, K. (2002). Forensic mental health assessment. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Hoge, S.K., Bonnie, R.J., Poythress, N.G., Monahan, J. (1997). MacArthur Competency Assessment Tool for Criminal Adjudication (MacCAT-CA). Lutz, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Rogers, R. (1992). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS): Professional manual. Lutz, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Shapiro, D.L. (2001). Criminal responsibility. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resources Press. Shapiro, D.L. (1990). Forensic psychological assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Tombaugh, T.N. (1996) Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Professional manual. Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walker, L.E.A., Shapiro, D.L. (2003). Clinical Assessment in Forensic Settings. In: Introduction to Forensic Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3795-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3795-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3421-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3795-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive