What is the Function of Cerebral Cortical Activation?

  • C. H. Vanderwolf
Chapter

Abstract

The preceding chapters have shown that many aspects of cerebral cortical electrical activity occur in close temporal correlation with the details of motor activity. However, the demonstration of a correlation between a brain electrical event and the occurrence of a movement is not sufficient to establish the significance of the cerebral electrical event in question. The fact that two events are correlated does not necessarily mean that one is the cause of the other. Both may be caused by some unknown third factor. This logical difficulty can be surmounted if the hypothesized causal factor can be eliminated in some way. For example, does surgical or pharmacological blockade of cerebral electrocortical activation have an effect on behavior? If it does, such activation may play a role in causing the behavior.

Keywords

Active Lever Mongolian Gerbil Inactive Lever Behavioral Syndrome Persistent Vegetative State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes on Chapter 8

  1. 1.
    Lindsley, D.B., Schreiner, L.H., Knowles, W.B., and Magoun, H.W. (1950). Behavioral and EEG changes following chronic brain stem lesions in the cat. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, 2: 483–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sherrington, C.S. (1906). The integrative action of the nervous system. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gregoire, S.E., and Smith, D.E. (1975). Mouse-killing in the rat: Effects of sensory deficits on attack behaviour and stereotyped biting. Animal Behaviour, 23: 186–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Zeigler, H.P. (1983). The trigeminal system and ingestive behavior. In E. Satinoff and P. Teitelbaum (eds.) Handbook of behavioral neurobiology, volume 6, Motivation, New York: Plenum Press, 265–327.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Woods, J.W. (1964). Behavior of chronic decerebrate rats. Journal of Neurophysiology, 27: 635–644.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    Vanderwolf, C.H., Kolb, B., and Cooley, R.K. (1978). Behavior of the rat after removal of the neocortex and hippocampal formation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 92: 156–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    Lashley, K.S. (1950). In search of the engram. In: Symposia of the Society of Experimental Biology, No. 4, Physiological mechanisms in animal behavior, 454–482.Google Scholar
  8. Myers, R.E., Sperry, R.W., and Miner McCurdy, N. (1962). Neural mechanisms in visual guidance of limb movement. Archives of Neurology, 7: 195–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 7.
    Vanderwolf, C.H. (2001). The hippocampus as an olfacto-motor mechanism: were the classical anatomists right after all? Behavioural Brain Research, 127: 25–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 8.
    Vanderwolf, C.H., Gutman, M., and Baker, G.B. (1984). Hypothalamic self-stimulation: the role of dopamine and possible relations to neocortical slow wave activity. Behavioural Brain Research, 12: 9–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 9.
    Vanderwolf, C.H. (1987). Near-total loss of `learning’ and `memory’ as a result of combined cholinergic and serotonergic blockade in the rat. Behavioural Brain Research, 23: 43–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vanderwolf, C.H., Baker, G.B., and Dickson, C. (1990). Serotonergic control of cerebral activity and behavior: models of dementia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 600: 366–383. It is interesting that several psychotomimetic drugs (cyclazocine, normetazocine, phenylcyclidine, and phenylcyclohexylamine) suppress both atropine-resistant hippocampal rhythmical slow activity and atropine-resistant neocortical low voltage fast activity in a selective manner [Vanderwolf, C.H. (1987). Suppression of serotonin-dependent cerebral activation: a possible mechanism of action of some psychotomimetic drugs. Brain Research, 414: 109–118] and also produce (at least in the case of cyclazocine) a marked increase in the impairment produced by scopolamine in swim-to-platform performance in rats. [Buckton, G., Zibrowski, E.M. and Vanderwolf, C.H. (2001). Effects of cyclazocine and scopolamine on swim-to-platform performance in rats. Brain Research, 922: 229–233]. Thus, in terms of large-scale cerebral electrophysiology and behaviour, these psychotomimetic drugs have effects similar to the effects ofp-chlorophenylalanine. The basis of this similarity deserves further investigation.Google Scholar
  13. 10.
    Robertson, B.J., Boon, F., Cain, D.P., and Vanderwolf, C.H. (1999). Behavioral effects of anti-muscarinic, anti-serotonergic, and anti-NMDA treatments: hippocampal and neocortical slow wave electrophysiology predict the effects on grooming in the rat. Brain Research, 838: 234–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 11.
    Ellard, C.G., Stewart, D.J., Donaghy, S., and Vanderwolf, C.H. (1990). Behavioural effects of neocortical and cingulate lesions in the Mongolian gerbil. Behavioural Brain Research, 36: 41–51. This paper developed from an undergraduate teaching laboratory exercise. Colin Ellard (a graduate student working with my colleague Mel Goodale in the years 1982–86), and Dwight Stewart (a graduate student working with me) were teaching assistants in an undergraduate laboratory course on the brain and behavior which I taught for many years. One of the laboratory exercises that students were asked to complete consisted of observation of the effects of large neocortical lesions in the Mongolian gerbil. Gerbils were chosen for this primarily because they remain lively and active in the bright, noisy environment of a student laboratory, a situation that elicits prolonged periods of crouching immobility in rats. Colin and Dwight became quite intrigued by this project, and with the assistance of Steve Donaghy, who needed a project for an undergraduate thesis, they produced an interesting paper showing, among other things, that several Type 2 behaviors were less affected by cortical lesions than Type 1 behaviors. Grooming behavior was affected by cortical lesions in much the same way that it is in rats.Google Scholar
  15. 12.
    Cannon, R.L., Paul, D.J., Baisden, R.H., and Woodruff, M.L. (1992). Alterations in self-grooming sequences in the rat as a consequence of hippocampal damage. Psychobiology, 20: 205–218.Google Scholar
  16. Morris, R.G.M., Garrud, P., Rawlings, N., and O’Keefe, J. (1982). Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature, 297: 681683.Google Scholar
  17. Sutherland, R.J., Kolb, B., and Whishaw, I.Q. (1982). Spatial mapping: definitive disruption by hippocampal or medial frontal cortical damage in the rat. Neuroscience Letters, 31: 271–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 13.
    Jennett, B., and Plum, F. (1972). Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. Lancet, 1: 734–737.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Plum, F. (1991). Coma and related global disturbances of the human conscious state. In: A. Peters and E.G. Jones (eds) Cerebral cortex, vol. 9, Normal and altered states offunction. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 359–428.Google Scholar
  20. 14.
    Myers, R.E. (1976). Comparative neurology of vocalization and speech: proof of a dichotomy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280: 745–757.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. H. Vanderwolf
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations