The Mind and Behavioral Neuroscience

  • C. H. Vanderwolf


Readers who have made their way through the preceding 10 chapters will have noted that none of the electrical events described in the neocortex, hippocampal formation and pyriform cortex have been related to mental activities. In fact, a good deal of evidence is presented to show that various aspects of brain electrical activity are not organized in accordance with conventional psychological ideas. A critical reader may well ask: “If the mind is not located in the cerebral cortex, then where is it?”


Subjective Experience Operant Conditioning Hippocampal Formation American Physiological Society Subjective Awareness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes on Chapter XI

  1. 1.
    Vanderwolf, C.H. (1998). Brain, behavior, and mind: What do we know and what can we know? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 22: 125–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Newton, Sir Isaac. (1931). Opticks. London: G. Bell & Sons Ltd., 1931 (Reprinted from the IV’h edition, 1730 ), pp 124–125.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haldane, E.S. and Ross, G.R.T. (1955). The philosophical works of Descartes: Volume I. New York: Dover Publications, (First published by Cambridge University Press, 1911, reprinted with corrections, 1931). The lines quoted are on pp 145–146, and p. 157.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnes, J. (ed) (1984). The complete works of Aristotle, volumes 1 & 2. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    a) Boring, E.G. (1953). A history of introspection. Psychological Bulletin, 50: 169–189.Google Scholar
  6. b) Hebb, D.O. (1980). Essay on mind. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. c) Humphrey, G. (1951). Thinking: an introduction to its experimental psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. a) Gopnik, A. (1993). How we know our minds: the illusion of first person knowledge of intentionality. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16:1–14.Google Scholar
  9. b) Hebb, D.O. (1977). To know your own mind. In Nicholas, J.M. (ed.) Images, perception and knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel; 213219.Google Scholar
  10. c) Lyons, W. (1986). The disappearance of introspection. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. d) Nisbett, R.E., and Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84: 231–259.Google Scholar
  12. 6.
    Lashley, K.S. (1958). Cerebral organization and behavior. Proceedings of the Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease, 36:1–18.Google Scholar
  13. 7.
    Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: how psychology found its language. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. 8.
    Russell, B. (1961). History of western philosophy. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  15. 9.
    Ostrum, A.E. (1994). The ‘locked-in’ syndrome–comments from a survivor. Brain Injury, 8: 95–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 10.
    A summary of evidence indicating that the hippocampal formation plays a role in the olfactory control of behavior is provided in Chapter 10 and by: Vanderwolf, C.H. (2001). The hippocampus as an olfacto-motor mechanism: were the classical anatomists right after all? Behavioural Brain Research, 127: 25–47.Google Scholar
  17. 11.
    Diamond, I.T. (1985). A history of the study of the cortex: changes in the concept of the sensory pathway. In: G.A. Kimble and K. Schlesinger (eds.) Topics in the history of psychology, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 305–387.Google Scholar
  18. 12.
    Gaffan, D. (2001). What is a memory system? Horel’s critique revisited. Behavioural Brain Research, 127: 5–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horel, J.A. (1978). The neuroanatomy of amnesia: a critique of the hippocampal memory hypothesis. Brain, 101: 403–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horel, J.A. (1994). Some comments on the special cognitive functions claimed for the hippocampus. Cortex, 30: 269–280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Vanderwolf, C.H. and Cain, D.P. (1994). The behavioral neurobiology of learning and memory: a conceptual reorientation. Brain Research Reviews, 19: 264–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 13.
    Eichenbaum, H., Morton, T.H., Potter, H. and Corkin, S. (1983). Selective olfactory deficits in case H.M. Brain, 106: 459–472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 14.
    Talland, G.A. (1965). Deranged memory: a psychonomic study of the amnesic syndrome, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. 15.
    This issue is discussed more extensively in the papers by Vanderwolf (2001) (see Note #10) and by Vanderwolf and Cain (see Note #12).Google Scholar
  25. 16.
    a) Peripheral filtering of non-attended stimuli: Hernandez-Peón, R., Scherrer, H., and Jouvet, M. (1956). Modification of electrical activity in cochlear nucleus during “attention” in unanesthetized cats. Science, 123: 331–332.Google Scholar
  26. b) Thalamic intralaminar nuclei and brain stem reticular formation: Jasper, H.H. (1960). Unspecific thalamocortical relations. In J. Field, H.W. Magoun and V.E. Hall (eds). Handbook of physiology, Section 1: Neurophysiology, volume 2. Washington, D.C. American Physiological Society, pp. 1307–1321.Google Scholar
  27. Lindsley, D.B. (1960). Attention, consciousness, sleep and wakefulness. In J. Field, H.W. Magoun, and V.E. Hall (eds) Handbook of physiology, Section 1: Neurophysiology, volume 3. Washington, D.C. American Physiological Society, pp. 15531593.Google Scholar
  28. c) Bennett, T.L. (1975). The electrical activity of the hippocampus and processes of attention. In R.L. Isaacson and K.H. Pribram (eds). The hippocampus, volume 2: Neurophysiology and behavior. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 71–99.Google Scholar
  29. d) Kaada, B.R. (1960). Cingulate, posterior orbital, anterior insular and temporal pole cortex. In J. Field, H.W. Magoun, and V.E. Hall (eds). Handbook of physiology, Section 1: Neurophysiology, volume 2. Washington, D.C. American Physiological Society, pp. 1345–1372.Google Scholar
  30. e) Colby, C.L., and Goldberg, M.E. (1999). Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22: 319–349. Kolb, B. and Whishaw, I.Q. (2001). An introduction to brain and behavior. New York: Worth Publishers, (see pp 537–539 ).Google Scholar
  31. f) McGaughy, J., Everitt, B.J., Robbins, T.W., and Sarter, M. (2000). The role of cortical cholinergic afferent projections in cognition: impact of new selective immunotoxins. Behavioural Brain Research, 115: 251–263.Google Scholar
  32. g) Aston-Jones, G., and Bloom, F.E. (1981). Activity of norepinephrine-containing locus coeruleus neurons in behaving rats anticipates fluctuation in the sleep-waking cycle. Journal of Neuroscience, 1: 876–886.Google Scholar
  33. Mason, S.T., and Iverson, S.D. (1979). Theories of the dorsal bundle extinction effect. Brain Research Reviews, 1: 107–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. h) Shors, T.J., and Matzel, L.D. (1997). Long-term potentiation: What’s learning got to do with it? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20: 597–655.Google Scholar
  35. i) Gloor, P. (1960). Amygdala. In J. Field, H.W. Magoun, and V.E. Hall (eds). Handbook of physiology, Section 1: Neurophysiology, volume 2. Washington, D.C. American Physiological Society, pp. 1395–1420.Google Scholar
  36. j) Freeman, W.J., and Skarda, C.A. (1985). Spatial EEG patterns, non-linear dynamics and perception: the neo-Sherringtonian view. Brain Research Reviews, 10: 147–175.Google Scholar
  37. 17.
    Radinski, L.B. (1987). The evolution of vertebrate design. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. 18.
    Bennett, A.F., and Ruben, J.A. (1979). Endothermy and activity in vertebrates. Science, 206: 649–654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 19.
    Jerison, H.J. (1973). Evolution of the brain and intelligence. New York: Academic Press, (see p. 15 ).Google Scholar
  40. 20.
    Weichert, C.K. (1970). Anatomy of the chordates, 4` h edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  41. 21.
    Beninger, R.J., Kendall, S.B., and Vanderwolf, C.H. (1974). The ability of rats to discriminate their own behaviours. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 28: 79–91. Rick Beninger went on to do graduate work at McGill University with Peter Milner and eventually became a professor in two departments, Psychology and Psychiatry, at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. H. Vanderwolf
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations