Surface Shear Stress Measurements

  • Jonathan W. Naughton
Chapter

Abstract

The measurement of surface shear stress has received a great deal of attention since the first measurements were made over 100 years ago. The continuing interest in the measurement of shear stress is a result of its importance to the fundamental understanding of wall-bounded flows and the significance of viscous drag in real systems such as aircraft and ship transportation. Measurement techniques that have been developed recently include several that use optical methods. These optical shear stress measurement methods are the focus of this chapter. For a detailed discussion of other shear stress measurement techniques, see the reviews by Winter,1 Haritonidis,2 and Naughton and Sheplak.3

Keywords

Shear Stress Wall Shear Stress Skin Friction Turbulent Boundary Layer Shear Stress Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K.G. Winter, “An outline of the techniques available for the measurement of skin friction in turbulent boundary layers,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 18,1–57 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.H. Haritonidis, “The measurement of wall shear stress,” Advances in Fluid Mechanics, Springer-Verlag, ed. M. Gadel-Hak, 229–261 (1989).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.W. Naughton and M. Sheplak, “Modern developments in shear stress measurement,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 38(6–7), 515–570 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.S. Settles, “Recent skin-friction techniques for compressible flows,” AIAA Paper 86–1099 (1986).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Fourguette, D. Modarress, F. Taugwalder, D. Wilson, M. Koochesfahani and M. Gharib, “Miniature and MOEMS flow sensors,” AIAA Paper 2001–2982 (2001).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.A. Naqwi and W.C. Reynolds, “Measurement of turbulent wall velocity gradients using cylindrical waves of laser light,” Experiments in Fluids, 10, 257–266 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Padmanabhan, M. Sheplak, K.S. Breuer, and M.A. Schmidt, “Micromachined sensors for static and dynamic shear stress measurements in aerodynamic flows,” Technical Digest, Transducers 97,137–140 (1997).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E.J. Klein and A.P. Margozzi, “Exploratory investigation on the measurement of skin friction by means of liquid crystals,” NASA/TM-X-1774 (1969).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D.C. Reda, M.C. Wilder, R. Mehta and G. Zilliac, “Measurement of continuous pressure and shear distributions using coating and imaging techniques,” AIAA Journal, 36 (6), 895–899 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.C. Reda, M.C. Wilder, D.J. Farina and G. Zilliac, “New methodology for the measurement of surface shear stress vector distributions,” AIAA Journal, 35(4), 608–614 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Merzkirch, Flow Visualization, Second edition, Academic Press, New York, 82–89 (1987).MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L.C. Squire, “The motion of a thin oil sheet under the boundary layer on a body”, in “Flow visualization in wind tunnels using indicators,” AGARDograph 70, ed. R.L. Maltby, 7–23 (1962).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L.H. Tanner and L.G. Blows, “A study of the motion of oil films on surfaces in air flow, with application to the measurement of skin friction”, Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instrumentation, 9(3), 194–202 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.L. Brown and J.W. Naughton, “The thin oil film equation,” NASA/TM 1999–208767, (1999).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Zilliac, “Further developments of the fringe-imaging skin friction technique,” NASA/TM 110425 (1996).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D.J. Monson and G.G. Mateer and F.R. Menter, “Boundary-layer transition and global skin friction measurement with an oil-fringe imaging technique,” SAE Paper No. 932550 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Mehta, J. Bell, D. Reda, M. Wilder, G. Zilliac and D. Driver, “Pressure and shear sensitive coatings,” Chapter 8 in Flow Visualization: Techniques and Examples, ed. by A. J. Smits and T.T. Lim, Imperial College Press, London, pp. 169–203 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. J. Garrison and M. Ackman, “Development of a global interferometer skin-friction meter,” AIAA Journal, 36, 62–68 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.K. Decker, J.W. Naughton and F. Jafari, “Automatic fringe detection for oil film interferometric skin friction measurement,” Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Flow Visualization, on CD ROM, ISBN 0 9533991 1 7, ed. I. Grant and G.M. Carlomagno, Paper 367 (2000).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.W. Naughton and J.L. Brown, “Surface interferometric skin-friction measurement technique,” AIAA Paper 96–2183 (1996).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A.I. Maksimov, A.A. Pavlov, and A.M. Shevchencko, “Development of the optical skin friction measurement technique for supersonic gradient flows,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on the Methods of Aerophysical Research, Part 2, Novisibirsk, Russia, 172–177 (1994).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.W. Naughton, and J.L. Brown, “Uncertainty analysis for oil-film interferometry skin-friction measurement techniques,” ASME Paper FEDSM97–3475 (1997a).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. Bourassa, F.O. Thomas and R.C. Nelson, “Oil film interferometry in turbulent boundary layer undergoing relaminarization,” Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Flow Visualization, on CD ROM, ISBN 0 9533991 1 7, ed. I. Grant and G.M. Carlomagno, Paper 38 (2000).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    G.G. Mateer, D.J. Monson and F.R. Menter, “Skin-friction measurements and calculations on a lifting airfoil,” AIAA Journal, 34(2), 231–236 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    G.G. Zilliac, “Skin friction distribution on a wingtip,” AIAA Paper 98–0584 (1998).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. M. Driver, “Applications of oil-film interferometry skin-friction to large wind tunnels,” AGARD Conference Proceedings CP 601, Advanced Aerodynamic Measurement Technology, Seattle, WA, USA, Paper 25 (1997).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. E. Olsen, D.M. Driver, E.T. Schairer and J.W. Naughton, “The ROCK (AST-1) wing — design, experiment and computation,” AIAA Paper 2000–0670 (2000).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J.W. Naughton and J.L. Brown, “Skin-friction distribution near a cylinder mounted on a flat plate,” AIAA Paper 97–1783 (1997b).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. Schtilein, “Skin friction and heat flux measurements in some 3-D supersonic turbulent separated flows,” Technical Report DLR IB 223–01 A06, in German (2001).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. Drake and R.A. Kennelly, Jr., “Oil film interferometry for skin friction measurement on an aircraft in flight,” Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Flow Visualization, on CD ROM, ISBN 0 9533991 0 9, ed. by G.M. Carlomagno and I. Grant, Paper 292 (1998).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    C. Davy, F.S. Alvi, and J.W. Naughton, “Surface flow measurements of micro-supersonic impinging jets,” AIAA Paper 2002–3196 (2002).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    F.S. Alvi, J. W. Naughton, C. Davy, and K.A. Phalinkar, “Flowfield and surface flow measurements of supersonic free and impinging microjets,” presented at the 10th International Symposium on Flow Visualization, Kyoto, Japan, August 26–29 (2002).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    S. Hoerner, Fluid Dynamic Drag, self-published, 2–10, 6–5 (1965).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    G.G. Zilliac, “The fringe-imaging skin friction technique PC application user’s manual,” NASA/TM 1999-208794 (1999).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan W. Naughton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of WyomingUSA

Personalised recommendations