Advertisement

Airline Recovery Model, the Model Suite for the Real-Time Management of the Operational Irregularities

  • Susanna Cappelletti
  • Marco Carcieri
  • Simona Falcomatà
  • Beniamino Paoletti
Part of the Applied Optimization book series (APOP, volume 79)

Abstract

Planning model of fueling and crew schedule is a terrible headache of the airlines companies that engage their resources to maintain and recover the planned operations. The growing competition reduces the tolerance of changes from the established best flight program. Then airline department has to manage daily operations aiming to reduce increasing cost when unpredictable events modify the programmed schedule execution. Addressing these objectives, Alitalia Operational Research Department has developed the Airline Recovery Model, the decisional support for the real-time management of irregular operations. Airline Recovery Model is built as a suite of optimization models for the Operations Control Center that aim at solving the problem of the operative irregularities by developing a global approach. After a general introduction with the problem description, the first section of this chapter presents Hub Recovery Model, to minimize the damage on the Origin-Destination passenger flows. The second section addresses Aircraft Recovery Model, to re-develop valid routings for each available aircraft of the fleet. The last section introduces the Crew Recovery Model, able to rebuild the crewmember pairings.

Keywords

airline hub recovery aircraft recovery crew recovery 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Andersson E., Housos E., Kohl N., Wedelin D. Crew Pairing Optimization. In OR in Airline Industry, G. Yu (ed.), University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Arguello M. F., Bard J. F., Yu G. Models and methods for managing airline irregular operations. In OR in Airline Industry, G. Yu (ed.), University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Barnhart C., Johnson E. L., Anbil R., Hatay L. A Column-Generation Technique for Long-Haul Crew-Assignment Problem. In Optimization in Industry, T. A. Ciriani, L. C. Leachman (eds.), New York: Wiley 1994.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Caprara A., Fischetti M., Toth P. A Heuristic Algorithm for Set Covering Problems Arising in Railway Applications. Ricerca Operativa, 25:75, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Grandeau S.C., Clarke M.D., Mathaisel D.F.X. The processes of airline system operations control. In OR in Airline Industry, G. Yu (ed.), University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Jarrah A. I. Z., Yu G., Krishnamurthy N., Rakhsit A. A Decision Support Framework for Airline Flight Cancellation and Delays. Transportation Science, 1993.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Klincewicz J. G., Rosenwein M. B. The Airline Exception Scheduling Problem. Transportation Science 29:1, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Lettovsky L., Johnson E. L., Nemhauser G. L. Airline Crew Recovery. Transportation Science, to appear.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Paoletti B., Cappelletti S., Lenner C. Operations Research Models for the Optimization of Aircraft Rotation and Routing in the Integrated Resources Management Process. In Handbook of Airline Operations, Butler G.F., Keller M.R. (eds.), McGraw-Hill, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Patty B.W., Diamond J. The complex configuration Model. In OR in Airline Industry G. Yu (ed.), University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Pilot M. General local search methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Stojkovic M., Soumis F., Desrosiers J. The Operational Airline Crew Scheduling Problem. Transportation Science, 32:3, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Talluri K.T. Swapping Applications in a Daily Airline Fleet Assignment. Transportation Science, 30:3, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Wei G., Yu G., Song G. A Decision Support Framework for Crew Management During Airline Irregular Operations. In OR in Airline Industry, G. Yu (ed.), University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA, 1998.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Yan S., Lin C.G. Airline Scheduling for the Temporary Closure of Airports. Transportation Science, 31:1, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanna Cappelletti
    • 2
  • Marco Carcieri
    • 1
  • Simona Falcomatà
    • 1
  • Beniamino Paoletti
    • 1
  1. 1.Operational Research DepartmentAlitaliaItaly
  2. 2.Operational Research DepartmentAlitaliaRomaItaly

Personalised recommendations