Value of Information Based Design of Control Software

  • Jan G. Norstrøm
  • Roger M. Cooke
  • Tim Bedford
Part of the Applied Optimization book series (APOP, volume 79)


This chapter presents a suggested alternative to simplistic majority voting schemes based on the value of uncertain information. It uses satellite antennae deployment as an illustrative example. Control software is used in satellites to activate system functions like e.g., antenna deployment. The software receives observations from sensors built into satellites and uses this information to trigger required functions. Often, inadvertent activation and delayed response can have severe consequences. Hence the way in which sensor information is processed strongly influences the system performance. We discuss an approach that models various “design” options in detail so that the software control flow can be optimised via decision theory. We give some mathematical back-ground and an example based on the Cluster satellite system that was spun off a design problem at European Space Research and Technology Centre. Our example considers the decision of when to deploy a satellite antenna. The control software must decide when to inspect sensors and when to deploy the antenna. We will show how to optimise both the inspection time and the time to deploy the antenna given the results of the inspection. For our example it is important that the consequences of the control software decisions are analysed and measured in monetary loss associated with failure. This allows us to measure the risk in expected loss of money. Given control software designs A and B one can compare them by obtaining the value of information.


decision theory control theory control software bayesian reliability risk analysis value of information space flight 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Norstrøm J. G, Cooke R. M, Bedford T. Value of Information based Design of Control Software. In Safety and Reliability, E. Zio, M. Demichela, N. Piccinini (eds.), Torino: MG, 419–426, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Norstrøm J. G, Cooke R. M, Bedford T. Statistical methods in design of safety critical software. In: Safety and Reliability, Lydersen, Hansen & Sandtorv (eds.), Rotterdam: Balkema, 1061–1068, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Norstrøm J. G, Cooke R. M, Bedford T. Value of Information based Inspection Strategy of a Fault-Tree. In Safety and Reliability, Kafka & Schüeller (eds.), Rotterdam: Balkema, 621–626, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bedford T, Cooke R. M. Reliability methods as management tools: dependence modelling and partial mission success. In Reliability Engineering and System Safety 58, Elsevier Science, 173–180, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Dore B., Norstrøm J. G. Pilot Application of Sneak Analysis on Computer Controlled Satellite Equipment. In Probabilistic Safety Asses-ment and Management, P.C. Cacciabue & I.A. Papazoglou (eds.), Heidelberg: Springer, 1590–1596, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    ESA Public Relations Division Offices, Ariane 5 Architecture. Scholar
  7. [7]
    Savage L. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Dover, 1972.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    De Groot M.H., Optimal Statistical Decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Cooke R. M, Goossens L. J. H. Procedures guide for structured expert judgment, Brussels: EUR 18820, European Commission, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Genz A. Numerical Computation of Multivariate Normal Probabilities. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 1 141–149, 1992.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Norstrøm J. G., Value of Information Based Design of Control Software. Delft University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Bedford T, Cooke R. M. Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods. Cambridge University Press, 2001.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan G. Norstrøm
    • 1
  • Roger M. Cooke
    • 2
  • Tim Bedford
    • 3
  1. 1.Section for System Safety and ReliabilityKongsberg Defence & AerospaceKongsbergNorway
  2. 2.Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Department CROSSTU-DelftDelftThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Management ScienceStrathclyde UniversityGlasgowScotland

Personalised recommendations