Advertisement

Copyright and Cultural Policy for the Creative Industries

  • Ruth Towse
Chapter

Abstract

Copyright, which was initially introduced for the encouragement of authors of literary and artistic works, is not able to offer artists sufficient economic incentive to create. Royalty payments to all but the top artists are typically small and firms in the creative industries are typically large, making for a very unequal bargaining situation. Already, though, digital delivery of cultural products is beginning to change this scenario and we can consider possible effects on markets and the implications for copyright and cultural policy.

Keywords

Labour Market Intellectual Property Price Discrimination Sound Recording Creative Industry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature References

  1. Acheson, K. and Maule, C. (1999). Much Ado About Culture — North American Trade Disputes. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, T. (1998). ‘Fair Use vs ‘Fared Use’: the Impact of Automated Rights Management on Copyright’s Fair Use Doctrine’. North Carolina Law Review, 761, pp. 558–619.Google Scholar
  3. Bettig, R. (1996). Copyrighting Culture. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  4. Caves, R. (2000). Economics of the Creative Industries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
  5. Howkins, J. (2001). The Creative Economy: How People Make Money from Ideas. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Goldstein, P. (1998). Copyright’s Highway: from Gutenburg to the Celestial Jukebox. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
  7. Granstrand, O. (2000). ‘The Shift Towards Intellectual Capitalism — The Role of Infocom Technologies’. Research Policy, 29, 9, pp. 1061–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Landes, W. and Posner, R. (1989). ‘An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law’. Journal of Legal Studies, 18, pp. 325–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Meurer, M. (1997). ‘Price Discrimination, Personal Use and Piracy: Copyright Protection of Digital Works’. Buffalo Law Review, 45, pp. 845–98.Google Scholar
  10. Monopolies and Mergers Commission (1996), Performing Rights. Cm. 3147. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  11. Plant, A. (1934). ‘The Economic Aspects of Copyright in Books’. Economica, May 1, pp. 167–95.Google Scholar
  12. Shapiro, C. and Varian, H. (1999). Information Rules. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  13. Towse, R. (ed.) (1997a). Cultural Economics: the arts, the heritage and the cultural industries, 2 vols. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Towse, R. (ed.) (1997b). Baumol’s Cost Disease: The Arts and Other Victims. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Towse, R. (2001a). Creativity, Incentive and Reward: an economic analysis of copyright and culture in the Information Age. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Towse, R. (2001b). ‘Partly for the Money: Rewards and Incentives to Artists’. KYKLOS, 54 2/3, pp. 473–90.Google Scholar
  17. Towse, R. (ed.) (2002). Copyright in the Cultural Industries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Towse, R. and Holzhauer, R. (eds.) (2002). Economics of Intellectual Property. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Towse
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of History and Art Studies (KCW)Erasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations