Abstract
Today there is a growing consensus among psycholinguists that morphological information plays a critical role in the highly automatized process of word recognition. At a linguistic level of analysis, morphology describes the word formation rules of a given language. A morphologically complex word, such as banker, represents the combination of at least two morphemes: the root bank and the suffix -er in the given example. As a consequence, from each root morpheme (e.g., bank) one can derive numerous morphologically complex words by adding another morpheme to the root (i.e., -er, -ing, -s, -rupt... to form the words banker, banking, banks, bankrupt...etc.). Thus, from a linguistic point of view, the accent is often placed on productivity when discussing the role of morphological information. Morphemic components (roots and affixes) can be used to create new word forms in production and to understand novel forms in comprehension. For example, someone who had never heard or read the word dimness before, but has knowledge of the root dim and the suffix — ness, could derive the meaning of the novel whole-word from the meaning and function of the component morphemes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beauvillain, C. (1996). The integration of morphological information and whole-word form information during eye fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 801–820.
Burton, A.M. (1998). In J. Grainger & A.M. Jacobs, Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical Representation. Language Production, 2, 257–295.
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297–332.
Colé, P., Beauvillain, C, Pavard, B., & Segui, J. (1986). Organisation morphologique et accès au lexique. L’Année Psychologique, 86, 349–365.
Colé, P., Beauvillain, C, & Segui, J. (1989).On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 1–13.
Deutsch, A., Frost, R., & Forster, K. I. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24,1238–1255.
Drews, E., & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1098–1116.
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 680–698.
Forster, K. I., Davis, C, Schoknecht, C, & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 211–251.
Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1277–1288.
Frost, R., Forster, K., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew ? A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 1–28.
Gardes-Tamines, J. (1988). La grammaire: phonologie, morphologie, lexicologie, Tome 1. Paris: Armand Colin.
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2000). Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 421–444.
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, in press.
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2002). On the role of derivational affixes in recognizing complex words: Evidence from masked priming. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Grainger, J., Colé, P., & Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 370–384.
Grainger, J. & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218–233.
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A., M. (1998). Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Henderson, L., Wallis, J., & Knight, D. (1984). Morphemic structure and lexical access. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance, X (pp.221–224). Hillsdale, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Laudanna, A., Burani, C, & Cermele, A. (1994). Prefixes as processing units. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 295–316.
Laudanna, A., Cermele, A., & Caramazza, A. (1997). Morpho-lexical representations in naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 49–66.
Lukatela, G., Gligorijevic, B., Kostic, A., & Turvey, M.T. (1980). Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory & Cognition, 8, 415–423.
Manelis, L., & Tharp, D. (1977). The processing of affixed words. Memory & Cognition, 5, 690–695.
McClelland, J. L. & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86.
McClelland, J.L., & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–405.
Meunier, F. & Segui, J. (1999). Frequency effects in auditory word recognition: The case of suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 327–344.
Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189–234.
Pillon, A. (1998). The pseudo-prefixation effect in visual word recognition: A true-neither strategic nor orthographic-morphemic effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 85–120.
Rastle, K., Davis, M.H., Marslen-Wilson, W.D., and Tyler, L.K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–538.
Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1994). Prefix stripping re-revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 357–375.
Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modelling morphological processing. In Feldman, L. B. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing, (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118–139.
Schriefers, H., Zwitserlood, P., & Roelofs, A. (1991). The identification of morphologically complex spoken words: Continuous processing or decomposition? Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 26–47.
Segui, J. & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 65–76.
Taft, M. (1981). Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 20, 289–297.
Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–294.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of verbal Learning and verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Giraudo, H., Grainger, J. (2003). A Supralexical Model for French Derivational Morphology. In: Assink, E.M.H., Sandra, D. (eds) Reading Complex Words. Neuropsychology and Cognition, vol 22. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3720-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3720-2_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3397-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3720-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive