The Effects of Morphological Structure on Children’s Reading of Derived Words in English

Part of the Neuropsychology and Cognition book series (NPCO, volume 22)

Abstract

The English written language system represents words at the level of the morpheme as well as the phoneme. It is likely, therefore, that awareness of not only the phonological but also the morphological structure of words plays a role in learning to read. While there is a large body of research that shows the importance of phonological awareness, there are many unanswered questions about the role of morphological awareness in the acquisition of reading skill. When and under what circumstances sensitivity to morphemic structure affects the word reading of children is the focus of the present chapter.

Keywords

Word Reading Poor Reader Morphological Awareness Base Word Complex Word 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berko J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology, Word, 14, 150–177.Google Scholar
  2. Carlisle, J.F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning-disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Carlisle, J.F. (In press). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing. Google Scholar
  5. Carlisle, J.F., & Nomanbhoy, D. (1993). Phonological and morphological development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Champion, A. H. (1997). Knowledge of suffixed words in reading and oral language contexts: A comparison of reading disabled and normal readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll, J.B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). Word frequency book. NY: American Heritage Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  8. Colé, P., Beauvillain, C, & Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elbro, C, & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldman, L.B., & Andjelkovic, D. (1992). Morphological analysis in word recognition. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 343–360). Netherlands: Elsevier Science Pub.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fowler, A.E., & Liberman, I.Y. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Fowler, C, Napps, S., & Feldman, L.B. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory and Cognition, 13, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frederiksen, J.R., & Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 361–379.Google Scholar
  14. Gordon, P. (1989). Levels of affixation in the acquisition of English morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, N.K. (1991). Development of morphophonemic segments in children’s mental representations of words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leong, C.K. (1989). Productive knowledge of derivational rules in poor readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 94–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L.K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. (1984). The number of words in printed school English. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R., Schommer, M., Scott, J.A., & Stallman, A.C. (1989). Morphological families and word recognition. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 262–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rubin, H. (1987). The development of morphological knowledge in relation to early spelling ability. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR 89/90, 121–131.Google Scholar
  21. Schlagal, R. C. (1992). Patterns of orthographic development into the intermediate grades. In S. Templeton & D. R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorialfestschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 31–52). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
  23. Stolz, J.A., & Feldman, L.B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109–130). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1995). The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 293–316). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
  25. Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1990). Use of derivational morphology during reading. Cognition, 36, 17–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wysocki, K., & Jenkins, J. (1987). Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations