QCD In Extreme Conditions

Part of the CRM Series in Mathematical Physics book series (CRM)


Recently we have made considerable progress in our understanding of the behavior of QCD in extreme conditions of high temperature or large baryon number density. Among the highlights are the prediction of a well-characterized true critical point, and the discovery that the ground state of three-flavor, QCD at asymptotically high densities exhibits color-flavor locking. The critical point occurs at the unique temperature and density where a sharp distinction between an ionized plasma of quarks and gluons and the hadronic phase first appears. It appears to be accessible both to numerical and to laboratory experiments. Color-flavor locking provides a calculable, weak-coupling realization of confinement and chiral symmetry breaking. It also provides a microscopic realization of Han-Nambu charge assignments for quark quasiparticles, and of Yang-Mills theory for the physical vector mesons. Here I provide a self-contained introduction to these developments.


Fermi Surface Wilson Loop Chiral Symmetry Baryon Number Chiral Symmetry Breaking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Sources and Further Reading

  1. 1.
    F. Wilczek, Internat. J. Modern Phys. A7 (1992), 3911.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, Nuclear Phys. B399 (1993), 395.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and E. Shuryak Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998), 4816.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Stephanov, in Understanding Deconfinement in QCD,eds. D. Blaschke, F. Karsch, and C.D. Roberts (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999), hep-ph/9906242.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Karsch, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 83 (2000), 14, hep-lat/9909006. Lecture 4 and Lecture 5 are based onGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Wilczek, Nucl.Phys. A663–664 (2000), 257, hep-ph/9908480. For further developments see especiallyGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Schäfer, Nucl. Phys. B575 (2000), 269, hep-ph/9909574.Google Scholar


  1. 1.
    M. Schmelling, Status of the strong coupling constant, plenary talk at the XXVIII International Conference on High Energy Physics, Warsaw, 1996, hep-ex/9701002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Burkhalter, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 73 (1999), 3, hep-lat/9810043.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.O. Anderson, E. Braaten and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. D61 (2000), 014017, hep-ph/9905337;Google Scholar
  4. J.-P. Blaizot, E. Iancu and A. Rebjam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 2906, hep-ph/9906340.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations