Shielding in Enclosures with Apertures

  • Bruce R. Archambeault
Part of the The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 696)


The fast data and edge rates of modern high-speed digital electronics often necessitate the use of some type of shielding to comply with EMI regulatory or other design requirements. The specifics of the shielding for a particular type of product and the expectations for EMI reduction can vary widely. At one end of the spectrum might be the transmitter or receiver of a wireless communication link operating in the microwave region. In this case, the shielding enclosure will typically be a cast or machined conductive enclosure. The distinct pieces of the enclosure might be screwed together, with careful attention devoted to the seam geometry at the microwave design frequency in order to prevent leakage from the interior or interference from external sources. All penetrations of the shielding enclosure will be carefully designed. Signals into or out of the design will be on shielded cables, with connectors that have 360° connections, e.g., a coaxial connector. Any microwave signals will be on coaxial cables. An electronic design requiring this level of attention to the shielding enclosure will be one for which cost is not an issue, or the design cannot function without such intricate attention to every enclosure penetration.


Magnetic Source Effective Shield Enclosure Wall Metal Shield Tangential Electric Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [12.1]
    D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, 2 nd Ed., John Wiley, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. [12.2]
    M. Li, J. L. Drewniak, S. Radu, J. Nuebel, T. Hubing, R. DuBroff, and T. Van Doren, “An EMI estimate for shielding enclosure evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 43, pp. 295–304, August 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [12.3]
    M. P. Robinson, T. M. Benson, C. Christopoulos, J. F. Dawson, M. D. Ganley, A. C. Marvin, S. J. Porter, and D. W. P. Thomas, “Analytical formulation for the shielding effectiveness of enclosures with apertures,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 40, pp. 240–248, August 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [12.4]
    F. Olyslager, E. Laermans, D. De Zutter, S. Criel, R. D. Smedt, N. Lietaert, and A. D. Clercq, “Numerical and experimental study of the shielding effectiveness of a metallic enclosure,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 41, pp. 203–213, August 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [12.5]
    R. Schaumann, and M. E. Van Valkenburg, Design of Analog Filters, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.Google Scholar
  6. [12.6]
    R. E. Collin, Field Theory of Guided Waves, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
  7. [12.7]
    C. A. Balanis, Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics, John Wiley, New York, 1989.Google Scholar
  8. [12.8]
    C. R. Paul, Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce R. Archambeault
    • 1
  1. 1.IBM CorporationResearch Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations