Advertisement

Old and New Unsolved Problems in Lattice-Ordered Rings that need not be f-Rings

  • Melvin Henriksen
Part of the Developments in Mathematics book series (DEVM, volume 7)

Abstract

Recall that a lattice-ordered ring or l-ring A(+, •, ∨, ∧) is a set together with four binary operations such that A(+, •) is a ring, A(∨, ∧) is a lattice, and letting P = {aA : a ∨ 0 = a{, we have both P + P and PP contained in P. For aA, we let a + = a ∨ 0, a - = (-a) and |a| = a ∨ (-a). It follows that a = a + - a -, |a| = a + + a -, and for any a, bA, |aa+b| < |a|+ |b| and |ab| < |a| |b|. As usual a < b means (b–a) ∈ P. We leave it to the reader to fill in what is meant by a lattice-ordered algebra over a totally ordered field.

Keywords

Structure Space Division Algebra Division Ring Laurent Series Subdirect Product 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [AB85]
    C. Aliprantis and O. Burkinshaw, Positive Operators. (1985) Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [BP56]
    G. Birkhoff and R. S. Pierce, Lattice-ordered rings. Anais. Acad. Brasil Cien. 29 (1956), 41–69.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [CD69]
    P. Conrad and J. Dauns, An embedding theorem for lattice-ordered fields. Pacific J. Math. 30 (1969), 385–398.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [D89]
    J. Dauns, Lattice ordered division rings exist. Ord. Alg. Struct. (Curaçao, 1988), W. C. Holland & J. Martinez, (1989) Math. Appl. 55 Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 229–234.Google Scholar
  5. [FH88]
    D. Feldman and M. Henriksen, f-Rings, subdirect products of totally ordered rings, and the prime ideal theorem. Proc. Ned. Akad. Wetensh. 91 (1988), 121–126.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [H71]
    M. Henriksen, On difficulties in embedding lattice-ordered integral domains in lattice-ordered fields. General Topology and its Relations to Modern Analysis and Algebra III; Proceedings of the Third Prague Topological Symposium (1971), Academia, Prague; (1972) Academic Press, New York, 183–185.Google Scholar
  7. [H97]
    M. Henriksen, A survey of f-rings and some of their generalizations. Ord. Alg. Struct. (Curaçao, 1995), W. C. Holland & J. Martinez, (1997) Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1–26.Google Scholar
  8. [HK91]
    M. Henriksen and R. Kopperman, A general theory of structure spaces with applications to spaces of prime ideals. Alg. Universalis 28 (1991), 349–376.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [Ma01a]
    J. Ma, The quotient rings of a class of lattice-ordered Ore domains. Alg. Universalis, to appear.Google Scholar
  10. [Ma01b]
    J. Ma, Finite-dimensional algebras that do not admit a lattice order. Preprint.Google Scholar
  11. [Mc62]
    R. A. McHaffey, A proof that the quaternions do not form a lattice-ordered algebra. Proc. Iraqi Sci. Soc. 5 (1962), 70–71.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [MW01a]
    J. Ma and P. Wojciechowski, A proof of the Weinberg conjecture. Proc. AMS, to appear; (preprint available) .Google Scholar
  13. [MW01b]
    J. Ma and P. Wojciechowski, Lattice orders on matrix algebras. Submitted; (preprint available) .Google Scholar
  14. [MW02]
    J. Ma and P. Wojciechowski, Structure spaces of maximalℓ-ideals of latticeordered rings. In these Proceedings, 261–274.Google Scholar
  15. [P64]
    R. S. Pierce, Review of [Mc62.]. MR 27 (1964), #5706.Google Scholar
  16. [R89]
    R. Redfield, Constructing lattice-ordered fields and division rings. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 40 (1989), 365–369.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [R92]
    R. Redfield, Lattice-ordered fields as convolution algebras. J. Algebra 153 (1992), 319–356.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [R00]
    R. Redfield, Unexpected lattice-ordered quotient structures. Ordered Algebraic Structures; Nanjing (2001); Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  19. [R01]
    R. Redfield, Subfields of lattice-ordered fields that mimic maximal totally ordered subfields. Czech. Math J.. 51 (126) (2001), 143–161.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [S86]
    N. Schwartz, Lattice-ordered fields. Order 3 (1986), 179–194.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [St00]
    S. A. Steinberg, On the scarcity of lattice-ordered matrix algebras II. Proc. AMS 128 (2000), 1605–1612.Google Scholar
  22. [Su68]
    H. Subramanian, Kaplansky–s theorem for frings. Math. Annalen 179 (1968), 70–73.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [W66]
    E. Weinberg, On the scarcity of lattice-ordered matrix rings. Pacific J. Math. 19 (1966), 561–571.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [Wi76]
    R. R. Wilson, Lattice orderings on the real field. Pacific J. Math. 63 (1976), 571–577.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [Wi80]
    R. R. Wilson, Anti- f-rings. Ordered Groups (Proc. Conf., Boise State Univ., Boise, Idaho, 1978), Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math. 62 (1980), M. Dekker, New York, 47–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melvin Henriksen
    • 1
  1. 1.Harvey Mudd CollegeClaremontUSA

Personalised recommendations