Multiple Imputation for Non-Random Missing Data in Longitudinal Studies of Health-Related Quality of Life

  • Diane L. Fairclough


Missing health-related quality of life (QOL) data in longitudinal studies rarely occur for a single reason. Some individuals drop out of the study as a result of mortality or morbidity of the disease or its treatment, others because their disease symptoms have disappeared. Individuals may have intermittent missing assessments for reasons both unrelated and related to treatment. Most methods for analysis focus on a single mechanism, such as informative dropout, and do not address multiple causes and patterns of missing data. These methods are generally based on strong assumptions that cannot be tested because of the missing data. Further, the estimates are often sensitive to the assumptions underlying the methods. The concepts of multiple imputation can be extended to longitudinal studies of QOL allowing 1) the incorporation of a mixture of models reflecting the variety of causes of missing data that occurs in these studies and 2) the uncertainty associated with the underlying assumptions of the models. However, the assumptions underlying the methods for imputing the missing data should be carefully examined in settings where the missing assessments are nonignorable.


Propensity Score Multiple Imputation Imputation Model Missing Observation Miss Data Mechanism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Wu, M.C. and Bailey, K.R. (1988). Analyzing changes in the presence of informative right censoring caused by death and withdrawal. Statistics in Medicine 7, 337–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wu, M.C. and Bailey, K.R. (1989). Estimation and comparison of changes in the presence of informative right censoring: conditional linear model. Biometrics 45, 939–955.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu, M.C. and Carroll, R.J. (1988). Estimation and comparison of changes in the presence of informative right censoring by modeling the censoring process. Biometrics 44, 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mori, M., Woodworth, G.G. and Woolson, R.F. (1992). Application of empirical Bayes inference to estimation of rate of change in the presence of informative right censoring. Statistics in Medicine 11, 621–631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schluchter, M.D. (1992). Methods for the analysis of informatively censored longitudinal data. Statistics in Medicine 11, 1861–1870.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Diggle, P. and Kenward, M.G. (1994). Informative drop-out in longitudinal analysis (with discussion). Applied Statistics 43, 49–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Troxel, A.B., Harrington, D.R and Lipsitz, S.R. (1998). Analysis of Longitudinal Data with Nonignorable non-monotone missing values. Applied Statistics 47, 425–438.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    SAS Institute (1996). The MIXED procedure. SAS/STAT Software. Changes and Enhancements (through Release 6.11). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schluchter, M.D. (1990). 5V: unbalanced repeated measures models with structured covariance matrices. In: BMDP Statistical Software Manual Part 2. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bonomi, P., Kim, K.M., Fairclough, D., Cella, D., Kugler, J., Rowinsky, E., Jiroutek, M. and Johnson, D. (2000). Comparison of survival and quality of life in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin versus etoposide-cisplatin: results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 18, 623–631.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cella, D.F., Bonomi, A.E., Lloyd, S.R., Tulsky, D.S., Kaplan, E. and Bonomi, P. (1995). Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy — Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument. Lung Cancer 12, 199–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cella, D.F., Tulsky, D.S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E.., Bonomi, A., Silberman, M., Yellen, S.B., Winicour, P. and Brannon J. (1993). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scales: development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology 11, 570–579.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fairclough, D.L., Peterson, H., Bonomi, P. and Cella, D.F. (1998). Comparison of model based methods dependent of the missing data mechanism in two clinical trials of cancer therapy. Statistics in Medicine 17, 781–796.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rubin, D.B. and Schenker, N. (1991). Multiple imputation in health-care data bases: an overview and some applications. Statistics in Medicine 10, 585–598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rubin, D.B. and Schenker, N. (1985) Multiple imputation for interval estimation from simple random samples with ignorable nonresponse. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 366–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schafer, J.L. (1997). Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Crawford, S.L., Tennstedt, S.L. and McKinlay, J.B. (1995). A comparison of analytic methods for non-random missingness of outcome data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 48, 209–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lavori, P.W., Dawson, R. and Shera, D. (1995). A multiple imputation strategy for clinical trials with truncation of patient data. Statistics in Medicine 14, 1912–1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jennrich, R.I. and Schluchter, M.D. (1986). Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance matrices. Biometrics 42, 805–820.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rubin, D.B. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Little, R.J. and Rubin, D.B. (1987). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Statistical Solutions (1997). Solas for Missing Data Analysis 1.0 User Reference.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yuan, Y.C. (2000). Multiple Imputation for Missing Data: Concepts and New Development. Rockville, MD: SAS Institue Inc. Cork, Ireland: Statistical Solutions Ltd.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    VanBuuren, S., Boshuizen, H.C. and Knook, D.L. (1999). Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine 18, 681–694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Little, R. and Yau, L. (1996). Intent-to-treat analysis for longitudinal studies with drop-outs. Biometrics 52, 1324–1333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Neter, J. and Wasserman, W. (1974). Applied Linear Statistical Models. Home-wood, IL: Richard Irwin, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane L. Fairclough
    • 1
  1. 1.AMC Cancer Research CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations