Skip to main content

Measures of Quality Adjusted Life and Quality of Life Deficiency: Statistical Perspectives

  • Chapter
Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies
  • 535 Accesses

Abstract

In the broad range WHO interpretation of Quality of Life, albeit made from an individualistic perspective, there are numerous qualitative factors along with some relatively more quantitative ones which are useful in the context of health related quality of life assessment problems. Though item analysis is commonly used in practice for (quantitative) risk assessment, for drawing valid conclusions, statistical reasoning is essential. Quality of life, survival time and quality adjusted life are important (population-based) measures that need to be appraised in light of statistical and health-related undercurrents. This paper addresses some basic statistical issues prevailing in this context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chatterjee, S.K. and Sen, P.K. (2000). On stochastic ordering and a general class of poverty indexes. Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin 50, 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P.L. and Sen, P.K. (2001). Quality adjusted survival estimation with periodic observations. Biometrics 57, 868–874.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R., Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A.E., Gore, S.M., Spiegelhalter, D.J. and Jones, D.R. (1992). Quality of Life assessment: can we keep it simple? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 155, 353–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayers, P.M. and Machin, D. (2000). Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelber, R.D. and Goldhirsch, A. (1986). A new endpoint for the assessment of adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with operable breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 4, 1772–1779.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gelber, R.D., Gelman, R.S. and Goldhirsch, A. (1989). A quality-of-life oriented endpoint for comparing therapies. Biometrics 45, 781–795.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gelber, R.D., Cole, B.F., Gelber, S. and Goldhirsch, A. (1995). Comparing treatments using quality-adjusted survival: the Q-TWIST method. The American Statistician 49, 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasziou, P.P., Simes, R.J., and Gelber, R.D. (1990). Quality adjusted survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine 9, 1259–1276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhirsch, A., Gelber, R.D., Simes, R.J., Glasziou, P. and Coates, A. (1989). Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group: cost and benefit analysis of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a quality adjusted survival analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology 7, 36–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karnofsky, D. and Burchenal, J. (1949). The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: McLeod, C. (ed.). Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. New York: Columbia University Press, pp.191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, T.K. (1986). An analysis of diversity using Rao’s quadratic entropy. Sankhyā, Series B 48, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, T.K., and Gastwirth, J.L. (1989). The use of diversity analysis to assess the relative influence of factors affecting the income distribution. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 7, 453–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C.R. (1982). Diversity: its measurement, decomposition, apportionment and analysis. Sankhyã, Series A 44, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1976). The measurement of poverty: an axiomatic approach. Econometrica 44, 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, P.K. (1986). The Gini coefficient and the poverty indexes: some reconciliation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 1050–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, P.K. (1996). Statistics and quality of life: third world perspectives. Journal of Applied Statistical Science 4, 231–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, P.K. (1999). Utility-oriented Gini-Simpson type indexes. Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin 49, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staquet, M.J., Hays, R.D. and Fayers, P.M. (eds.) (1998). Quality of Life Assessment in Clinical Trials: Methods and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrocker, O., Traeger, C. and Battman, S. (1949). Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of the American Medical Association 140, 659–662.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group (1994). The development of the World Health Organization quality of life assessment instrument (the WHOQOL). In: Orley, J. and Kuyken, W. (eds.). Quality of Life Assessment in Health Care Setting. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H. and Tsiatis, A.A. (2000). Estimating mean quality of lifetime with censored data. Sankhyā, Series B 62, 175–188.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sen, P.K. (2002). Measures of Quality Adjusted Life and Quality of Life Deficiency: Statistical Perspectives. In: Mesbah, M., Cole, B.F., Lee, ML.T. (eds) Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3625-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3625-0_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5207-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3625-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics