Skip to main content

A Model Relating Quality of Life to Latent Health Status and Survival

  • Chapter
Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies

Abstract

QOL assessments measure a subject’s state of health and well-being in a global sense or with reference to particular domains of function, symptoms and living. In this chapter, we define a QOL process for a subject as a continuous-time stochastic process that is periodically assessed by means of a survey instrument. The QOL process is assumed to have three components: a survival component that is correlated with the survival time of the subject, a palliative component that reflects a subject’s comfort, freedom from pain and other aspects of well-being that are not correlated with survival, and a noise component that represents a combination of measurement errors and extraneous effects. We present a statistical model that can be used to distinguish between the survival component and the combined palliative and noise components. Our model also provides a way of incorporating markers of health status in the analysis and evaluating their importance. The model assumes that health status and related health markers follow a joint stochastic process. The markers are assumed to be observable whereas the health status process is assumed to be latent or unobservable. The primary endpoint, which we take to be death, is assumed to be triggered when this latent process first crosses a failure threshold level. Inferences for the model are based on censored survival data and marker measurements. Covariates, such as treatment variables, risk factors and other baseline variables, are related to the model parameters through generalized linear regression functions. We interpret the model as a joint process for QOL, latent health status and, possibly, markers of health status. The portion of the QOL process that is correlated with the latent health status process forms the survival component of QOL. The proposed model provides a rich conceptual framework for the study of QOL issues and offers a flexible and tractable methodology for associated statistical inferences. The model and methods are illustrated by a small case demonstration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cox, D. R. (1999). Some remarks on failure-times, surrogate markers, degradation, wear and the quality of life. Lifetime Data Analysis 5, 307–314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glasziou, P.P., Cole, B.F., Gelber, R.D., Hilden, J., Simes, R.J. (1998). Quality adjusted survival analysis with repeated quality of life measurements. Statistics in Medicine 17, 1215–1229.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.-L.T., V. DeGruttola and D. Schoenfeld (2000). A model for markers and latent health status. J. Royal. Statist Soc., Series B 62, 747–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.-L.T. and G. A. Whitmore (2000a). Assumptions of a Latent Survival Model. In: Proceeding of the Conference on Goodness of Fit, 1999, Paris, France, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.-L.T. and G. A. Whitmore (2000b). Distribution-free inference methods for latent disease progression and survival. Technical paper, Channing Laboratory, Harvard Medical School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, G. A., Crowder, M.J. and Lawless, J.F. (1998). Failure inference from a marker process based on a bivariate Wiener model. Lifetime Data Analysis 4, 229–251.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H. and A. A. Tsiatis (1997). A consistent estimator for the distribution of quality-adjusted survival time. Biometrika 84, 339–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H. and A. A. Tsiatis (1999). Efficient estimation of the distribution of quality-adjusted survival time. Biometrics 55, 231–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H. and A. A. Tsiatis (2000). Estimating mean quality-adjusted lifetime with censored data. Sankyha, Series B 62, 175–188.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, ML.T., Whitmore, G.A. (2002). A Model Relating Quality of Life to Latent Health Status and Survival. In: Mesbah, M., Cole, B.F., Lee, ML.T. (eds) Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3625-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3625-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5207-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3625-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics