Borrowing Constraint and Indeterminacy with Arbitrarily low Returns to Scale

  • Jean-Paul Barinci
  • Arnaud Chéron
Chapter

Abstract

This paper argues that a finance constrained economy populated by two classes of households with heterogeneous preferences, workers and capitalists, allows to overcome two traditional puzzles that feature the link between indeterminacy and macroeconomics. It will be shown that, according to the elasticity of substitution between the productive factors and the intertemporal elasticity of substitution of capitalists, the model can exhibit indeterminacy with degrees of increasing returns-to-scale consistent with the more recent estimates. In addition, it will be established that, in opposition to conventional endogenous business cycle models, fluctuations driven by sunspots are consistent with procyclical movements of aggregate consumption.

Keywords

Business Cycle Labor Demand Market Imperfection Aggregate Consumption Borrowing Constraint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiyagari, R. (1995). The econometrics of indeterminacy: an apply study: a comment. Carnergie Rochester Series in Public Policy, 43:273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barinci, J. and Chéron, A. (2001). Sunspots and the business cycle in a finance constrained economy. Journal of Economic Theory, 97:30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barinci, J. and Drugeon, J. (1999). A geometric approach to local indeterminacy and local bifurcations in three-dimensional dynamic systems. working-paper 1999.40, EUREQUA-Université de Paris I.Google Scholar
  4. Basu, S. and Fernald, J. (1997). Returns to scale in us production: estimates and implications. Journal of Political Economy, 105:249–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benhabib, J. and Farmer, R. (1994). Indeterminacy and increasing returns. Journal of Economic Theory, 63:19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benhabib, J. and Farmer, R. (1996). Indeterminacy and sector specific externalities. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37:397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, R. and Farmer, R. (2000). Indeterminacy with non-separable utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 93:118–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnside, C. (1996). Production function regressions, returns to scale, and externalities. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37:177–201.Google Scholar
  9. Cazzavillan, G., Lloyd-Braga, T., and Pintus, P. (1998). Multiple steady state and endogenous fluctuations with increasing returns to scale in production. Journal of Economic Theory, 80:60–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooley, T. and Prescott, E. (1995). Economic growth and business cycles. In Cooley, T., editor, Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, pages 1–38. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  11. Duffy, J. and Papageorgiou, C. (2000). A cross-country empirical investigation of the aggregate production function specification. Journal of Economic Growth, 5:87–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamermesh, D. (1993). Labor Demand. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hansen, G. (1985). Indivisible labor and the business cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics, 16(3):309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. King, R. and Rebelo, S. (1999). Resuscitating real business cycles. In Taylor, J.B. W. M., editor, Handbook of Macroeconomics. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  15. Schmitt-Grohé, S. (2001). Endogenous business cycles and the dynamics of output, hours and consumption. American Economic Review, 90(5): 1136–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wen, Y. (1998). Capacity utilization under increasing returns to scale. Journal of Economic Theory, 81:7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Paul Barinci
    • 1
  • Arnaud Chéron
    • 2
  1. 1.EPEEUniversité d’Evry — Val d’Essonne & EUREQua, Université de Paris IFrance
  2. 2.GAINSUniversité du Maine & EUREQua, Université de Paris IFrance

Personalised recommendations