Skip to main content

A Comparison of Alternative Productivity Growth Measures: With Application to Electricity Generation

  • Chapter
Efficiency in the Public Sector

Part of the book series: Studies in Productivity and Efficiency ((SIPE,volume 1))

Abstract

This chapter has two principal aims. The first is to measure total factor productivity (TFP) change in Australian coal-fired electricity generation. The second aim is to compare and contrast two alternative approaches to the calculation of Malmquist TFP indices. Namely, a data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach (Färe, Grosskopf, Norris and Zhang, 1994) and a stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) approach (similar to that used in Perelman, 1995). We also compare these results with those obtained using the more traditional Törnqvist index approach (Caves, Christensen and Diewert, 1982).

This is a revision of a paper presented to the International Conference on Public Sector Efficiency, UNSW, Sydney, 27–28 November, 1997. The data used in this study is taken from Coelli (1995), a study which was part-financed by the Australian Electricity Supply Industry Research Board. I am grateful to Prasada Rao, Rolf Fare Kevin Fox and an anonymous referee for comments made on earlier drafts. Any errors that remain are my own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ABS (1989), “Development of Multifactor Productivity Estimates for Australia 1974–75 to 1987–88”, Australian Bureau of Statistics Information Paper No. 5229.0, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aigner, D.J., and S.F. Chu (1968), “On Estimating the Industry Production Function”, American Economic Review, 58, 826–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G.E. and T.J. Coelli (1995), “A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier production Function for Panel Data”, Empirical Economics, 20, 325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G.E., and T.J. Coelli (1992), “Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in India”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, E.R. (1978), “Aggregate Energy, Efficiency, and Productivity Measurement”, Annual Review of Energy, 3, 225–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Industry Economics (1992), International Performance Indicators — Electricity, Research Report 40, AGPS, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Industry Economics (1994), International Performance Indicators — Electricity Update, Research Report 54, AGPS, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen and W.E. Diewert (1982b), “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity”, Econometrica, 50, 1393–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T.J. (1995), “Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in Australian Electricity Generation”, paper presented at the New England Conference on Efficiency and Productivity, University of New England, Armidale, November 23–24, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T.J. (1996a), “A Guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Frontier Production Function Estimation”, CEPA Working Paper 96/07, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T.J. (1996b), “A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program”, CEPA Working Paper 96/08, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T.J., D.S. Prasada Rao and G.E. Battese (1998), An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cowing, T.G. and Smith, V.K. (1980), “The Estimation of a Production Technology: A Survey of Econometric Analyses of Steam-Electric Generation”, Land Economics, 54, 156–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESAA (1993), Measuring the Efficiency of the Australian Electricity Supply Industry, a report by London Economics (consulting firm) to the Electricity Supply Association of Australia, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESAA (1994), International Performance Measurement for the Australian Electricity Supply Industry 1990–1991, Electricity Supply Association of Australia, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf and P. Roos (1997), “Malmquist Productivity Indexes: A Survey of Theory and Practice”, In R. Färe, S. Grosskopf and R.R. Russell (Eds.), Index Numbers: Essays in Honour of Sten Malmquist, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and C.A.K. Lovell (1985), The Measurement of Efficiency of Production, Boston, Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang (1994), “Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Changes in Industrialised Countries”, American Economic Review, 84, 66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, S. Yaisawarng, S.K. Li and Z. Wang (1990), “Productivity Growth in Illinios Electric Utilities”, Resources and Energy, 12, 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grifell-Tatjé, E., and C.A.K. Lovell (1995), “A Note on the Malmquist Productivity Index”, Economics Letters, 47, 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf, S. (1993), “Efficiency and Productivity”, in Fried, H.O., C.A.K. Lovell and S.S. Schmidt (Eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, Oxford University Press, New York, 160–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimizu, M., and J.M. Page (1982), “Total Factor Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Technical Efficiency Change: Dimensions of Productivity Change in Yugoslavia, 1965–78”, Economic Journal, 92, 920–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, S. (1995), “R&D, Technological Progress and Efficiency Change in Industrial Activities”, Review ofIncome and Wealth, 41, 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission (1996), Electricity 1996 — International Benchmarking, Research Report 96/16, AGPS, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, R.W. (1970), Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, P.L. (1990), “Real Rates of Return in Electricity Supply: New South Wales, Tasmania and Victoria”, Economic Record, 66, 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan Consultants (1991), An International Benchmark for Australia ’s Electricity Supply Industry, Report prepared for the Business Council of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitsch, J. and D. Lawrence (1996), “Decomposing Economic Inefficiency in Base-load Power Plants”, Journal ofProductivity Analysis, 7, 359–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coelli, T. (2002). A Comparison of Alternative Productivity Growth Measures: With Application to Electricity Generation. In: Fox, K.J. (eds) Efficiency in the Public Sector. Studies in Productivity and Efficiency, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3592-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3592-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4923-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3592-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics