Performance Measurement and Resource Allocation

  • Suthathip Yaisawarng
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Productivity and Efficiency book series (SIPE, volume 1)

Abstract

A number of studies have documented that public and private sector organisations do not use their limited resources efficiently. A possible implication is that reallocation of resources from the provision of goods and services that have relatively low marginal social benefits to those that have relatively high marginal social benefits would enhance overall social welfare. Another implication is that resources have not been used by the most productive means; ie, it is possible to produce more goods and services without additional resources. Suggested remedies range from industry reforms such as restructuring and deregulation to promote competition, to institutional changes such as adoption of efficient management practices.

Keywords

Data Envelopment Analysi Efficiency Score Data Envelopment Analysi Model Decision Making Unit Input Price 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bogetoft, P. (1995) “Incentives and Productivity Measurements,” International Journal of Production Economics, 39, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campos, J.E. and S. Pradhan (1997) “Evaluating Public Expenditure Management Systems: An Experimental Methodology with an Application to the Australia and New Zealand Reforms,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(3), 423–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coelli, T., D.S.P. Rao, and G.E. Battese (1998) An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and C.A.K. Lovell (1994) Production Frontiers, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Kettl, D.F. (1997) “The Global Revolution in Public Management: Driving Themes, Missing Links,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(3), 446–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lovell, C.A.K. (1993) “Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency,” in The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, H.O. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell and S.S. Schmidt, eds., New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lovell, C.A.K., L.C. Walters, and L.L. Wood (1994) “Stratified Models of Education Production using Modified DEA and Regression Analysis,” in Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Application, A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, A.Y. Lewin and L.M. Seiford, eds., Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Macdonald, G. (1996) “There are no Resources to Redistribute,” Sydney Morning Herald, September 10.Google Scholar
  9. New South Wales Government (1997) Budget Estimates 1997–98, Budget Paper No.3, Volume 1.Google Scholar
  10. Norton, R. (1994) “Economics for Managers: Which Offices or Stores Really Perform Best? A New Tool Tells,” Fortune, October 31, 38.Google Scholar
  11. Nunamaker, T.R. (1985) “Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Measure the Efficiency of Non-Profit Organisations: A Critical Evaluation,” Managerial and Decision Economics 6(1), 50–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pierce, J. and N. Puthucheary (1997) “Using Performance Measures to Drive Change within the Public Sector,” New South Wales Treasury Research and Information Paper no. TRP 97–3.Google Scholar
  13. Steering Committee for the Review of Commonwealth/State Service Provision (1997) Data Envelopment Analysis: A Technique for Measuring the Efficiency of Government Service Delivery, AGPS: Canberra.Google Scholar
  14. Stewart, J. (1993) “New Management Relationships in the Public Sector: The Limitations of Government by Contract,” Public Money and Management, July-September, 7–12.Google Scholar
  15. Stoner, J.A.F., P.W. Yetton, J.F. Craig, and K.D. Johnston (1994) Management, 2nd Edition, Sydney: Prentice-Hall Australia.Google Scholar
  16. Torgersen, A.M., F.R. Førsund, and S.A.C. Kittelsen (1996) “Slack-Adjusted Efficiency Measures and Ranking of Efficiency Units,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilson, P. (1995) “Detecting Influential Observations in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 6(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suthathip Yaisawarng
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUnion CollegeSchenectadyUSA

Personalised recommendations