Abstract
This chapter connects assumptions about probability distributions, decision makers’ risk attitudes, and the resulting methods used to order risky choices. The methods we discuss are consistent with the expected utility hypothesis because up to this point in time no alternative for decision making under risk has gained widespread acceptance.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Hadar, J., and W.R. Russell. 1969. “Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects.” American Economic Review 59: 25–34.
Hanoch, G., and H. Levy. 1969. “Efficiency Analysis of Choices Involving Risk.” Review of Economic Studies 38: 335–346.
Kimball, M. 1993. “Standard Risk Aversion.” Economnetrica 61: 589–611.
King, R., and L. Robison. 1981. “An Interval Approach to Measuring Decision Maker Preferences.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63: 510–520.
Kramer, R.A., and R.D. Pope. 1981. “Participation in Farm Commodity Programs: A Stochastic Dominance Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63: 119–128.
Meyer, D.J., and J. Meyer. 2001. “Habit Formation Utility, the Equity Premium Puzzle, and Risk Preferences in Multi-Period Consumption Models.” Draft Working Paper (January).
Meyer, J. 1977. “Choice Among Distributions.” Journal of Economic Theory 14: 326–336.
Meyer, J. 1987. “Two Moment Decision Models and Expected Utility Maximization.” American Economic Review 77: 421–430.
Meyer, J., and R.H. Rasche. 1992. “Sufficient Conditions for Expected Utility to Imply Mean-Standard Deviation Rankings: Empirical Evidence Concerning the Location and Scale Condition.” The Economic Journal 102: 91–106.
Pope, R.D., and R.F. Ziemer. 1984. “Stochastic Efficiency, Normality, and Sampling Errors in Agricultural Risk Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 31–40.
Robison, L.J., and P.J. Barry. 1987. The Competitive Firm’s Response to Risk. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc.
Robison, L.J., and L. Lev. 1986. “Distinguishing Between Indirect and Direct Outcome Variables to Predict Choices Under Risk or Why Woody Chip Went to the Air.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 8: 59–68.
Rothschild, M., and J.E. Stiglitz. 1971. “Increasing Risk II: Its Economic Consequences.” Journal of Economic Theory 2: 66–84.
Sinn, H.-W. 1983. Economic Decisions Under Uncertainty. New York: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robison, L.J., Myers, R.J. (2002). Ordering Risky Choices. In: Just, R.E., Pope, R.D. (eds) A Comprehensive Assessment of the Role of Risk in U.S. Agriculture. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 23. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3583-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3583-3_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4924-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3583-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive