Names, Numbers, and Global Governance

  • Milton L. Mueller
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series book series (TREP, volume 43)

Abstract

In 1995, the management of Internet domain names started to blow up into a global policy issue. Controversy over this issue led to the formation in 1998 of a new international organization, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). ICANN and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) went about creating a new global regime that links domain name assignment and intellectual property dispute resolution. ICANN has even toyed with the possibility of creating a new form of global citizenship for Internet users.

Keywords

Dispute Resolution Address Space Internet Service Provider Global Governance Domain Name System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benkler, Yochai. 1998. Overcoming Agraphobia: Building the Commons of the Digitally Networked Environment. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 11, http://http://www.law.nyu.edu/benklery/admin/overcomingabstract.html.Google Scholar
  2. Coase, Ronald. 1959. The Federal Communications Commission. Journal of Law and Economics 2 (October): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Faltstrom, Patrik. 2000. E.164 number and DNS. Internet Engineering Task Force. RFC 2916 (September) http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2916.txt.Google Scholar
  4. Froomkin, Michael. 2000. Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route around the APA and the Constitution. Duke Law Journal 50, no. 1 (October): 17–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hazlett, Thomas. 1990. The Rationality of U.S. Regulation of the Broadcast Spectrum. Journal of Law and Economics 34, no. 1 (April): 133–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Internet Architecture Board. 2000. Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root. RFC 2826. (May) ftp://ftp.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2826.txt.Google Scholar
  7. Klensin, John. 2000. Internationalizing the DNS—A New Class. Internet Draft (13 December).Google Scholar
  8. Mueller, Milton. 1999. ICANN and Internet Governance: Sorting through the Debris of Self-Regulation. Info 1, no. 6, (December): 477–500.Google Scholar
  9. Mueller, Milton. 2001. Rough Justice: A statistical assessment of ICANN’s Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy. The Information Society (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  10. United States Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration. 1998. Management of Internet Names and Addresses. Statement of Policy. Federal Register 63, 111, 31741 (10 June).Google Scholar
  11. United States General Accounting Office, Proposed Report. 2000. Department of Commerce: Relationship with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. (7 July). Available at http://www.icann.org/general/gao-report-07jul00.pdf. WIP02 RFC-3.2001.Google Scholar
  12. WIP02 RFC-3.2001. Interim Report of the Second WIPO Internet Domain Name Process. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization (12 April), http:// wipo2.wipo.int/process2/rfc/rfc3/index.html.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milton L. Mueller
    • 1
  1. 1.Syracuse University School of Information StudiesUSA

Personalised recommendations