Towards a Modeling Formalism for Conflict Management

  • T. I. Ören


The article starts with brief reviews of conflict management and limitations of classical Newtonian paradigm in the studies of human-related disciplines. A new modeling formalism and associated simulation formalism for conflict management simulation studies are presented. The modeling formalism is based on multimodels. A multimodel is a modular model where only one module (alternate model) is active at a certain time. Special cases of multimodels are introduced as metamorphic models and multi-aspect models. In a metamorphic model there is a predefined sequence for the alternate models. A multi-aspect model is a special case of a multimodel where the condition of having only one alternate model active at a given time is relaxed; the resulting formalism can be useful in modeling (and simulating) several aspects of an entity simultaneously. Evolutionary models can also be conceived as special cases of multimodels. In a multistage modeling formalism, several aspects of the reality can be formulated by sets of component models. Under emerging conditions, one can add emerging successor models to existing models to explore behavior of alternative system models. In the article, multistage model formalism is suggested as a simulation modeling formalism for sociocybernetics systems in general and for conflict management such as conflict avoidance and conflict resolution in particular.


Conflict Resolution Finite State Machine Conflict Management Conflict Avoidance State Transition Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Arquilla, J. and Ronfeldt, D., A New Epoch -and Spectrum- of Conflict(RAND, Santa Monica, CA., 1997), Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Balencie, J-M. and de La Grange, A., Monde rebelles — Guerres civiles et violences politiques -Encyclopedie des conflits-(Editions Michalon, Paris, France, 1999).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Barnsley, M.F. et al., The Science of Fractal Images(Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Casti, J.L., Connectivity, Complexity, and Catastrophe in Large-Scale Systems(Wiley-Interscience, Chichester, England, 1979).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Davis, P., Applying Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Strategic-Level Gaming and Simulation. In: M.S. Elzas, T.I. Ören, and B.P. Zeigler (eds.) Modelling and Simulation Methodology in the Artificial Intelligence Era. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1986), pp. 315–338.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Davis, P.K. and Arquilla, J., Thinking About Opponent Behavior in Crisis and Conflict: A Generic Model for Analysis and Group Discussion. (RAND/R-4111-JS, RAND, Santa Monica, CA, 1991).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Davis, PK., Bankes, SC., and Weissler, R., Formalization of Tradeoff Rules and Other Techniques for Comprehending Complex Rule-Based Models. In: M.S. Elzas, T.I. Ören, and B.P. Zeigler (eds.) Modelling and Simulation Methodology -Knowledge Systems’ Paradigms. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989), pp. 231–240.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Gelenbe, E., Interacting Assemblies of Goal-Based Learning Agents, (Presentation at the Dagstuhl Conference on: Agent-Oriented Approaches in Distributed Modelling and Simulation: Challenges and Methodologies July 4–9, 1999, Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Geyer, F. and van der Zouven, J., Bibliography on Sociocybernetics(3rdedition). (, 1998).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Gill, A., Introduction to the Theory of Finite-State Machines, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Grant, N., Illustrated History of 20 th Century Conflict, (Reed Consumer Books, London, England, 1992).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Hart, S. and Mas-Colell, A., (eds.) Cooperation: Game-Theoretic Approaches. NATO ASI Series. Series F, Computer and Systems Sciences, vol. 155, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Hartmanis, J. and Stearns, R.E., Algebraic Structure Theory of Sequential Machines. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1966).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Holden, A.V., (ed.) Chaos. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1986).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Kaufmann, S., At Home in the Universe : The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity, (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, England, 1996).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Khalilzad, Z. and Lesser, I.O., Sources of Conflict in the 21 st Century — Regional Futures and U.S. Strategy, (RAND, Santa Monica, CA, 1998).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Knight, D.E., H.W. Curtis, and Fogel, L.J., (eds.) Cybernetics, Simulation, and Conflict Resolution, Proc. of the 3rdAnnual Symposium of the American Society for Cybernetics (Spartan Books, New York, 1971).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Lund, M., Preventing and Mitigating Violent Conflict A Guide for Practitioners(Creative Associates Inc., Washington, DC, 1996).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Marshall, I., and Zohar, D., Who’s Afraid of Schrodinger’s Cat? (Quill-William Morrow, New York, 1997).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Ören, T.I., (ed.) Cybernetics & Modelling & Simulation of Large-Scale Systems, (International Association for Cybernetics, Namur, Belgium, 1978).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Ören, T.I., Model Update: A Model Specification Formalism with a Generalized View of Discontinuity, (Proceedings of the Summer Computer Simulation Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1987 July 27–30), pp. 689–694.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Ören, T.I., Dynamic Templates and Semantic Rules for Simulation Advisors and Certifiers, In: P.A. Fishwick and R.B. Modjeski (eds). Knowledge-Based Simulation: Methodology and Application, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991), pp. 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Ören, T.I., Computer-Aided Systems Technology: Its Role in Advanced Computerization, (In. F. Pichler and R.M. Diaz (eds.) Computer Aided Systems Theory -EUROCAST ’93, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993), pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Ören, T.I., Artificial Intelligence and Simulation: A Typology. (In: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Computer Simulation, S. Raczynski (ed.), Mexico City, Nov. 15–17, 1995), pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Ören, T.I., Agent-Oriented Approaches in Distributed Modelling and Simulation: Challenges and Methodologies, (Presentation at the Dagstuhl Conference on: Agent-Oriented Approaches in Distributed Modelling and Simulation: Challenges and Methodologies July 4–9, 1999, Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany).Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Ören, T.I., Zeigler, B.P., Concepts for Advanced Simulation Methodologies, (Simulation, 32:3, 1979), pp. 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Pew, R.W. and Mavor, A.S., (eds.) Modeling Human and Organizational Behavior -Application to Military Simulation(National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1998).Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Praehofer H., Modelling and Simulation. (Chapter 3 of the book by F. Pichler and H. Schwaertzel, CAST Methods in Modelling, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992), pp. 123–241.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I., Order out of Chaos -Man’s New Dialog with Nature, (Bantam Books, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Prusinkiewicz, P. and Hanan, J., Lindenmayer Systems, Fractals, and Plants. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1980).Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    RAND-1, Over 800 Documents on Conflict, (, 2000).Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    RAND-2, 70 RAND Corp. Abstracts on Conflict— 1952–1999,, 2000Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Riley, V.G. and Young, J.P., Bibliography on War Gaming, (Operations Research Office, The John Hopkins University, Chevy Chase, MD, 1957).Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Rubinstein, A., Modeling Bounded Rationality, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998).Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Rupesinghe, K., (ed) Conflict Transformation, (Macmillan, Basingstoke, England, 1995).Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Rupesinghe, K. and Anderlini, S.N., Civil Wars, Civil Peace -An Introduction to Conflict Resolution, (Pluto Press, London, England, 1998).Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Salthe, S.N., Evolving Hierarchical Systems, (Columbia University Press, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Schelling, T., The Strategy of Conflict, (Harvard Univ Press, 1960 — reprint edition: 1980).Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Shubik, M., (ed.) Game Theory and Related Approaches to Social Behavior. Wiley, New York, 1964).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Spriet, J.A., and Vansteenkiste, G.C., Computer-Aided Modelling and Simulation. Academic Press, London, England, 1982).Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Toffler, A., Science and Change-Forward to the Book: Order out of Chaos — Man’s New Dialog with Nature by I. Prigogine and I. Stengers, (Bantam Books, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Vitanyi, P.M.B., Lindenmayer Systems: Structure, Languages, and Growth Functions, (Mathematical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1980).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Waldrop, M.M., Complexity : The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos, (Touchstone Books, 1993).Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    Wegrirzyn, S., Gille, J-C. and Vidal, P., Developmental Systems — At the Crossroads of System Theory, Computer Science, and Genetic Engineering, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990).Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    Wymore, A.W., A Mathematical Theory of Systems Engineering — The Elements, (Wiley, New York, 1967).Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Zeigler, B.P., Multifaceted Modelling and Discrete Event Simulation(Academic Press, London, England, 1984).Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    Zeigler, B.P., Object-Oriented Simulation with Hierarchical, Modular Models -Intelligent Agents and Endomorphic Systems(Academic Press, London, 1990).zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. I. Ören

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations