Dopaminergic Effects on Acquisition and Consolidation: A Microdialysis Study

  • Masahiko Nomura
  • Kiyoyuki Maruki
  • Koji Hori
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 53)

Abstract

While experimental animals are learning on a schedule-controlled discrimination learning task in an operant type Skinner box, one may examine the relationship between learning ability and neurochemical changes by measuring the content of various neurotransmitters using a microdialysis method. In particular, some of the catecholamines have much closer correlations with learning ability compared to other neurotransmitters. Among the catecholamines, dopamine and its metabolites in amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, and cortex are increased during learning performance. Dopamine appears to play an important role in the acquisition and consolidation stages of learning.

Keywords

Discrimination Learning Lever Press Microdialysis Study Anterior Thalamus Consolidation Stage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K. Hori, J. Tanaka, and M. Nomura, Effects of discrimination learning on the rat amygdala dopamine release : a microdialysis study, Brain Res., 621, 296–300 (1993).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. Yamamuro, K. Hori, H. Iwano, and M. Nomura, The relationship between learning performance and dopamine in the prefrontal cortex of the rat, Neurosci Lett., 177, 83–86 (1994).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Yamamuro, K. Hori, J. Tanaka, H. Iwano, and M. Nomura, Septohippocampal cholinergic system under the discrimination learning task in the rat: a microdialysis study with the dual-probe approach, Brain Res., 684, 1–7 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Benveniste, Brain microdialysis, J Neurochem., 52, 1667–1679 (1989).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Schoenbaum, A.A.Chiba, and M. Gallagher, Orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala encode outcomes during learning, Nature Neurosci., 1, 155–159 (1998).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Izaki, K. Hori, and M. Nomura, Dopamine and acetylcholine elevation on lever press acquisition in rat prefrontal cortex, Neurosci Lett., 258, 33–36 (1998).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. Izaki, K. Hori, and M. Nomura, Distribution of rat lever-press learning by hippocampo-prefrontal disconnection, Brain Res., 860, 199–202 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Nader, and J.E. LeDoux, Inhibition of the mesoamygdala dopaminergic pathway impairs the retrieval of conditioned fear associations, Behav Neurosci., 113, 891–901 (1999).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. A. Perinado-Monzano, The role of the amygdala and the hippocampus in working memory for spatial and non-spatial information, Behav Neurosci., 38, 117–134 (1990).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. Schultz, Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nature Rev Neurosci., 1, 199–207 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masahiko Nomura
    • 1
  • Kiyoyuki Maruki
    • 2
  • Koji Hori
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologySaitama Medical SchoolSaitamaJapan
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatrySaitama Medical SchoolSaitamaJapan
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyRikkyo UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations