Intertemporal Tax Smoothing and Budget Deficits in Japan: 1957–1997

Part of the Research Monographs in Japan-U.S. Business & Economics book series (JUSB, volume 7)


Faced with a prolonged economic downturn in the 1990s, the Japanese government implemented various economic measures, including a series of large-scale public work programs. As a result, the long-term debt outstanding of the national and local governments combined is projected to soar up to 666 trillion yen or about 130% of GDP by the end of FY2001. The steep increases in the government debt give rise to the concern of its future burden and thus fiscal consolidation is now a top priority in medium- and long-term fiscal policy. There is no denying that a rapid increase in government debt might retard economic growth. However, budget deficits also play the role of a cushion that absorbs economic shocks and thus we cannot prematurely conclude a priori that budget deficitsare always undesirable.


Government Expenditure Budget Deficit Welfare Loss Government Debt Budget Surplus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allesina, A. and G. Tabellini, 1990, A positive theory of fiscal deficits and government debt, Review of Economic Studies 57, 402–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asako, K., T. Ito and K. Sakamoto, 1991, The rise and fall of deficit in Japan:1965–1990, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 5, 451–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro, R., 1979, On the determination of the public debt, Journal of Political Economy 87, 940–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barro, R., 1981, On the predictability of tax -rate changes, NBER Working Paper #636.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, J., 1987, Does saving anticipate declining labor income? An alternative test of the permanent income hypothesis, Econometrica 55, 1249–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, J. and G Mankiw, 1989, Consumption, income and interest rates: Reinterpreting the time series evidence, in Oliver Blanchard and Stanley Fischer eds. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ghosh, A., 1995, Intertemporal tax-smoothing and the government budget surplus: Canada and the United States, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 27, 1033–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall, R., 1978, Stochastic implications of the life cycle-permanent income hypothesis: Theory and evidence, Journal of Political Economy 86, 971–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang, Chao-Hsi and K. Lin, 1993, Deficits, government expenditures, and tax smoothing in the United States: 1929–1988, Journal of Monetary Economics 31, 317–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mankiw, G., 1987, The optimal collection of seigniorage: Theory and evidence Journal of Monetary Economics 20, 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Poterba, J. and J. Rotemberg, 1990, Inflation and taxation with optimizing governments, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 22, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sahasakul, C., 1986, The U.S. Evidence on optimal taxation over time, Journal of Monetary Economics 18, 251–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Trehan, B. and C. Walsh, 1988, Common trends, the government’s budget constraint, and revenue smoothing, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 425–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Trehan, B. and C. Walsh, 1990, Seigniorage and tax smoothing in the United States: 1914–1986, Journal of Monetary Economics 25, 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations