Skip to main content

The Evaluation of Tournament Outcomes

Comments on Zermelo (1929)

  • Chapter
Annotated Readings in the History of Statistics

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Statistics ((PSS))

  • 925 Accesses

Abstract

This paper by the noted German mathematician Ernst Zermelo (1871–1953) was long overlooked and was brought to the attention of the statistical community only in the mid-1960s, by John Moon and Leo Moser, professors of mathematics at the University of Alberta, Canada. Zermelo is concerned with the evaluation of players in chess tournaments, especially for tournaments lacking the balance of Round Robins, where all pairs of players meet equally often. There had long been an obvious method for dealing with Round Robins, namely to rank players according to their number of wins (counting draws as half-wins).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bradley, R.A. and Terry, M.E. (1952). The rank analysis of incomplete block designs. I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39, 324–345.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • David, H.A. (1988). The Method of Paired Comparisons, 2nd edn. Griffin, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R.R. (1970). On extending the Bradley—Terry model to accommodate ties in paired comparison experiments. J. Amer. Statist. Assn., 65, 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, L.R., Jr. (1957). Solution of a ranking problem from binary comparisons. Amer. Math. Monthly, 64, 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M.G. (1955). Further contributions to the theory of paired comparisons. Biometrics, 11, 43–62.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J.W. (1968). Topics on Tournaments. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rootselaar, B. van (1981). Zermelo. Dictionary of Scientific Biography, 13, 613–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L.L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychol. Rev., 34, 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, T.H. (1952). The algebraic foundations of ranking theory. Unpublished Thesis, Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zermelo, E. (1929). Die Berechnung der Turnier-Ergebnisse als ein Maximumproblem der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Math. Zeit., 29, 436–460.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

David, H.A., Edwards, A.W.F. (2001). The Evaluation of Tournament Outcomes. In: Annotated Readings in the History of Statistics. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3500-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3500-0_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3174-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3500-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics