The First Formal Test of Significance
Further, The same Arguments which explode the notion of Luck may, on the other side, be useful in some Cases to establish a due comparison between Chance and Design: We may imagine Chance and Design to be as it were in Competition with each other, for the production of some sorts of Events, and may calculate what Probability there is, that those Events should be rather owing to one than to the other.
KeywordsRoyal Society Genetical Theory Prob Ability Natural Theology Male Birth
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aitken, G.A. (1892). The Life and Works of John Arbuthnot. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Bentley, R. (1693). The Folly and Unreasonableness of Atheism. Reprinted in Dyce (1838).Google Scholar
- Dyce, A. (ed.) (1838). The Works of Richard Bentley D.D., Vol. 3. Macpherson, London.Google Scholar
- Fisher, R.A. (1935). The Design of Experiments. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
- Moivre, A. de (1718). The Doctrine of Chances. Pearson, London.Google Scholar
- Paley, W. (1802). Natural Theology — or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity Collected from the Appearances of Nature. Vincent, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Todhunter, I. (1865). A History of the Mathematical Theory of Probability. Macmillan, Cambridge. [Reprinted by Chelsea, New York, 1949, 1965.]Google Scholar
- Westfall, R.S. (1980). Never at Rest—A Biography of Newton. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar