Advertisement

Estimating a Binomial Parameter Using the Likelihood Function

Comments on Thiele (1889)
  • H. A. David
  • A. W. F. Edwards
Part of the Springer Series in Statistics book series (SSS)

Abstract

As was the case with probability in the seventeenth century, likelihood had been emerging as a new concept for some time before it was formalized and named (by Fisher, 1921). Early examples of the method of maximum likelihood have been noticed in the work of J.H. Lambert and Daniel Bernoulli in the eighteenth century and discussed by several authors (see Edwards, 1974; Hald, 1998, Chapter 5; and Stigler, 1999, Chapter 16, for introductions to the literature), and the emergence of the method in modern times has been discussed by Aldrich (1997), Edwards (1997b), and Hald (1998, Chapter 28; 1999).

Keywords

Likelihood Function Error Curve Prob Ability Binomial Coefficient Binomial Parameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldrich, J. (1997). R.A. Fisher and the making of maximum likelihood 1912–1922. Statist Sci., 12, 162–176.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Edwards, A.W.F. (1972, 1992). Likelihood. Cambridge University Press. Expanded Edition 1992, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Edwards, A.W.F. (1974). The history of likelihood. Intern. Statist. Rev., 42, 9–15. Reprinted in Likelihood, Expanded Edition 1992, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edwards, A.W.F. (1997a). Three early papers on efficient parametric estimation. Statist. Sci., 12, 35–47.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards, A.W.F. (1997b). What did Fisher mean by “inverse probability” in 1912–22? Statist. Sci., 12, 177–184.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisher, R.A. (1912). On an absolute criterion for fitting frequency curves. Messenger. Math., 41, 155–160.Google Scholar
  7. Fisher, R.A. (1921). On the “probable error” of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron, 1, 3–32.Google Scholar
  8. Fisher, R.A. (1922). On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, A, 222, 309–368.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher, R.A. (1956). Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Hald, A. (1981). T.N. Thiele’s contributions to statistics. Intern. Statist. Rev., 49, 1–20.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hald, A. (1998). A History of Mathematical Statistics from 1750 to 1930. Wiley, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Hald, A. (1999). On the history of maximum likelihood in relation to inverse probability and least squares. Statist. Sci., 14, 214–222.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lauritzen, S. L. (1999). Aspects of T. N. Thiele’s contributions to statistics. Bull. Int. Statist. Inst. 58, 27–30.Google Scholar
  14. Stigler, S.M. (1999). Statistics on the Table. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Thiele, T.N. (1889). The General Theory of Observations: Calculus of Probability and the Method of Least Squares (in Danish). Reitzel, Copenhagen.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Thiele, T.N. (1931). The theory of observations. Ann. Math. Statist, 2, 165–307.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. A. David
    • 1
  • A. W. F. Edwards
    • 2
  1. 1.Statistical Laboratory and Department of StatisticsIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Gonville and Caius CollegeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations