Skip to main content

Comparing Two Treatments in a Large Phase III Clinical Trial

  • Chapter
Applied Statistics in the Pharmaceutical Industry
  • 501 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter outlines some of the analyses performed for a Phase III oncology trial. The trial was conducted by F. Hoffmann-La Roche and took place between 1996 and 1998. More than 600 cancer patients receiving either a new experimental therapy or a standard treatment were included in the trial. Besides a description of the data, the statistical analysis methods used for some of the analyses are detailed (with an emphasis on survival analysis). The applications of the methods using S-Plus are outlined. The focus is on the analyses as specified in the trial protocol. Due to space limitation, not all analyses performed for the trial are mentioned and not all aspects of the trial are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ellenberg, S.S. and Hamilton, J.M. (1989). Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: Cancer. Statistics in Medicine 8, 405–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauck, W.W. and Anderson, S. (1986). A comparison of large-sample confidence interval methods for the difference of two binomial probabilities. The American Statistician 40, 318–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Conference on Harmonization (1998). Topic E 9: Statistical Prin- ciples for Clinical Trials, Step 4, Consensus Guideline. 5 February 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, H.J.A., Molenaar, I.W., Strik, R. van, and Boomsma, A. (1980). Comparing two independent binomial proportions by a modified chi square test. Biometrical Journal 22, 241–248.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Venables, W.N. and Ripley, B.D. (1997). Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization-Geneva (1979). WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jahn, M. (2001). Comparing Two Treatments in a Large Phase III Clinical Trial. In: Millard, S.P., Krause, A. (eds) Applied Statistics in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3466-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3466-9_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3166-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3466-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics