Advertisement

Single-Ended Instrumental Measurement of Image Quality

  • Jean-Bernard Martens
  • Lydia Meesters
Chapter

Abstract

Over the past few years, we have witnessed a growing academic and industrial interest into understanding and modeling the quality discrimination process that underlies the human judgement of images. The ability to model this process is of interest for many applications, including designing new image coding or processing systems, and monitoring the performance of existing systems. We may wonder how realistic such an enterprise is, and how far we have progressed towards the set goal over the past few years. We therefore start with a personal view on the topic of image quality modeling, and motivate why we have chosen a different approach from the mainstream activities in this area.

Keywords

Image Quality Instrumental Measure Gaussian Window Uniform Region Ideal Edge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A. Agresti: “Categorical data analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 105: 290301, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Agresti: Categorical Data Analysis. John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York, 1990.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Ahumada Jr., A.J.: “Computational image-quality metrics: a review.” in SID 93 Digest, pp. 305–308, Society for Information Display, Santa Ana, California, 1993.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Anderson, P. Philips: “Regression, discrimination and measurement models for ordered categorical variables.” Applied Statistics 30: 22–31, 1981.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    T. Carney et al.: “The development of an image/threshold database for designing and testing human vision models.” in Human Vision and Electronic Imaging IV, eds. B. Rogowitz, T. Pappas, vol. 3644, pp. 542–551, Proceedings of the SPIE, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Daly, S.: “Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity.” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display III, ed. B.E. Rogowitz, vol. 1666, pp. 2–15, Proceedings SPIE, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Daly, S.: “Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity.” in Digital Images and Human Vision, ed. A.B. Watson, pp. 179–206, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1993.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    N. Draper, H. Smith: Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York, 1998.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Eckert, M.P. and Bradley, A.P.: “Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression.” Signal Processing 70: 177–200, 1998.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Falmagne: “Psychophysical measurement and theory.” in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance —Sensory Processes and Perception, eds. K. Boff, L. Kaufman, J. Thomas, pp. 1–66, John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York, 1986.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Fibush, D.K.: “Practical application of objective picture quality measurements.” in IBC97, pp. 123–135, International Broadcast Union, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. Georgeson, T. Freeman: “Perceived location of bars and edges in one-dimensional images: Computational models and human vision.” Vision Research 37: 127–142, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Ghosal, S. and Mehrotra, R.: “Detection of composite edges.” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 3:14–25, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Ghosal, S. and Mehrotra, R.: “A moment-based unified approach to image feature detection.” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 6: 781–793, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Hunt, R.W.G.: “Colour terminology.” Color Research and Application 3: 79–87, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Jensen, K. and Anastassiou, D.: “Subpixel edge localization and the interpolation of still images.” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 4: 285295, 1995.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    S. Karunasekera, N. Kingsbury: “A distortion measure for blocking artifacts in images based on human visual sensitivity.” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 4: 713–724, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    V. Kayargadde: Feature Extraction for Image Quality Prediction. PhD Dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, 1995.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Kayargadde, V. and Martens J.B.: “Estimation of edge parameters and image blur using polynomial transforms.” Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing: Graphical Models and Image processing 56: 442–461, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Kayargadde, V. and Martens J.B.: “Estimation of perceived image blur using edge features.” International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology 7: 102–109, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Kayargadde, V. and Martens J.B.: “An objective measure for perceived noise.” Signal Processing 49: 187–206, 1996.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Kayargadde, V. and Martens J.B.: “Perceptual characterization of images degraded by blur and noise: experiments.” Journal of the Optical Society of America A 13: 1166–1177, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Kayargadde, V. and Martens J.B.: “Perceptual characterization of images degraded by blur and noise: model.” Journal of the Optical Society of America A 13: 1178–1188, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Lindh, P. and van den Branden Lambrecht, C.J.: “Efficient spatio-temporal decomposition for perceptual processing of video sequences.” in IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, vol. III of III, pp. 331334, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1996.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Lubin, J.: “The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance.” in Digital Images and Human Vision, ed. A.B. Watson, pp. 162–178, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1993.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Lubin, J.: “A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation.” in Visual Models for Target Detection and Recognition, ed. E. Peli, World Scientific Publishers, River Edge, N.J., 1995.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    R. Luce, C. Krumhansl: “Measurement, scaling, and psychophysics.” in Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology — Perception and Motivation, eds. R. Atkinson, R. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, R. Luce, pp. 3–74, John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York, 1988.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Lyvers, E.P. and Mitchell, O.R.: “Precision edge contrast and orientation estimation.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 10: 927–937, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Lyvers, E.P. and Mitchell, O.R. and Akey, M.L. and Reeves, A.P.: “Subpixel measurements using a moment-based edge operator.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11: 1293–1309, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    J.-B. Martens: “Multidimensional modeling of image quality.” submitted to IEEE Proceedings 1999.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Martens, J.B.: “The hermite transform - applications.” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing ASSP-38:1607–1618, 1990.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Martens, J.B.: “The hermite transform–theory.” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing ASSP-38: 1595–1606, 1990.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Martens, J.B.: “Adaptive contrast enhancement through residue-image processing.” Signal Processing 44: 1–18, 1995.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Martens, J.B.: “Local orientation analysis in images by means of the her-mite transform.” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 6: 1103–1116, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Martens, J.B. and Meesters, L.: “Image dissimilarity.” Signal Processing 70: 155–176, 1998.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Meesters, L. and Martens, J.B.: “A sinle-ended blockiness measure for jpeg-coded images.” submitted to Signal Processing 1999.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    A. Parducci, D. Wedell: “The category effect with rating scales: Number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 12: 496516, 1986.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Pennebaker, W.B. and Mitchell, J.L.: JPEG still image compression standard. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1993.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Silverstein, D.A. and Farell, J.E.: “The relationship between image fidelity and image quality.” in IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 881–884, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1996.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Tan, K.T. and Ghanbari, M. and Pearson, D.E.: “An objective measurement tool for mpeg video quality.” Signal Processing 70: 279–294, 1998.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Teo, P. and Heeger, D.: “Perceptual image distortion.” in IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 982–984, Austin, Texas, 1994.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    L. Thurstone: “A law of comparative judgement.” Psychological Review 34: 273–286, 1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    X. Tong, D. Heeger, C. van den Branden Lambrecht: “Video quality evaluation using st-cielab.” in Human Vision and Electronic Imaging IV: Models, Methods and Applications, eds. B. Rogowitz, T. Pappas, vol. 3644, pp. 185–196, Proceedings of the SPIE, 1999.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    W. Torgerson: Theory and Methods of Scaling. John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York, 1958.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    van den Branden Lambrecht, C.J.: “Color moving pictures quality metric.” in IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, vol. I of III, pp. 885–888, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1996.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    van den Branden Lambrecht, C.J.: Perceptual models and architectures for video coding applications. Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland, 1996.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    R. Young: “The gaussian derivative theory of spatial vision: Analysis of cortical cell receptive field line-weighting profiles.” General Motors Research Labs Report GMR-4920, 1985.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Yuen, M. and Wu, H.R.: “A survey of hybrid me/dpcm/dct video coding distortions.” Signal Processing 70: 247–278, 1998.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    Zetzsche, C. and Hauske, G.: “Multiple channel model for the prediction of subjective image quality.” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display, ed. B.E. Rogowitz, vol. 1077, pp. 209–216, Proceedings SPIE, 1989.Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    Zhang, X. and Wandell, B.A.: “Color image fidelity metrics evaluated using image distortion maps.” Signal Processing 70: 201–214, 1998.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Bernard Martens
    • 1
  • Lydia Meesters
    • 1
  1. 1.IPO - Center for User-System InteractionEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations