How Should We Measure Pension Liabilities in EU Countries?

  • Richard Disney
Chapter

Abstract

How pension liabilities are measured is central to our understanding of the long-run sustainability of European social security programmes. Better data and forecasting procedures are an integral part of any attempt to understand the magnitude of these pension liabilities. Measures of pension liabilities are highly susceptible to both measurement error and to misinterpretation. Moreover, misjudgement of future costs are exacerbated by accounting measures that tend both to understate the extent of future liabilities and to overstate the potential costs of some reform strategies.

Keywords

Pension Scheme Public Pension Earning Growth Pension Reform Primary Balance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BANKS J., DISNEY R. and SMITH, Z. (2000), ‘What can we learn from Generational Accounts for the United Kingdom?’, Economic Journal Features, 110 (November), F575–F597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BLEJER M. I. and CHEASTY A. (1991), ‘The measurement of fiscal deficits: Analytical and methodological issues’, Journal ofEconomic Literature, XXIX (December), 1644–1678.Google Scholar
  3. BOHN H. (1992), ‘Budget deficits and government accounting’, in Meltzer A. and Plosser C. (eds.) Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 36, July, 1–84.Google Scholar
  4. CHAND S. and JAEGER A. (1996), ‘Aging populations and public pension schemes’, Occasional Paper, 147, The International Monetary Fund, Washington.Google Scholar
  5. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (2000), ‘Progress report to the Ecofin Council on the impact of ageing population on public pension systems’, mimeo, Economic Policy Committee, EPC/ECFIN/581/00-EN-FINAL, Brussels, 26 October.Google Scholar
  6. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY (1998), A New Contract for Welfare: Partnership in Pensions, Cm 4179, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  7. DISNEY R. (1996), Can We Afford To Grow Older? A Perspective on the Economics of Aging, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  8. DISNEY R. (1999), ‘Notional Accounts as a pension reform strategy: An evaluation’, SP Discussion Paper, No. 9928, HDSP, the World Bank, Washington.Google Scholar
  9. DISNEY R. (2000a), ‘Crises in public pension programmes in OECD: What are the reform options?’, Economic Journal Features, 110, February, F1–F23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DISNEY R. (2000b), ‘Declining public pensions in an era of demographic ageing: Will private provision fill the gap?’, European Economic Review, 44:4–6 and 957–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DISNEY R. and WHITEHOUSE E. (1992), The Personal Pension Stampede, Report Series, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.Google Scholar
  12. DISNEY R. and WHITEHOUSE E. (1993a), ‘Will younger cohorts obtain a worse deal from the UK pension scheme?’, 85–103, in Creedy J. and Casson M. (eds.) Industrial Concentration and Economic Inequality: Essays in Honour of Peter Hart, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  13. DISNEY R. and WHITEHOUSE E. (1993b), ‘Contracting-out and lifetime redistribution in the UK state pension system’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 55 (February), 25–41.Google Scholar
  14. DISNEY R. and WHITEHOUSE E. (1996), ‘What are occupational pension plan entitlements worth in the Britain?’, Economica, 63 (May), 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. HEMMING R. and KAY J. (1981), ‘Contracting out of the State Earnings Related Pension Scheme’, Fiscal Studies, 2 (February), 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. HOLZMANN R., PALACIOS R. and ZVINIENE A. (2000), ‘On the economics and scope of implicit pension debt: An international perspective’, mimeo, HDSP Department, the World Bank, Washington.Google Scholar
  17. KANE C. and PALACIOS R. (1996), ‘The implicit pension debt’, Finance and Development, June, 36–38.Google Scholar
  18. KOTLIKOFF L. (1992), Generational Accounting, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. KUNE J. (1996), ‘The hidden liabilities: Meaning and consequences’, mimeo, CBP seminar Series, Den Haag, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  20. VALDES-PRIETO S. (1999), ‘The financial stability of notional account pensions’, mimeo, Catholic University of Chile.Google Scholar
  21. VAN DEN NOORD P. and HERD R. (1994), ‘Estimating pension liabilities: A methodological approach’, OECD Economic Studies, 23:131–166.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Disney

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations