Skip to main content

Attitudes of Egyptian Intellectuals Towards Genital Integrity for All

  • Chapter
  • 432 Accesses

Abstract

Intellectuals and medical doctors play a leading role in society. They set the ideological terms of reference concerning many basic issues, such as genital surgery/mutilation. At times, they are responsible for fixing stagnant social concepts, taking a modern attitude towards some modern issues while becoming reactionary when faced with others. Whether intellectuals and medical doctors act as leaders of social change or conformity in the issue of genital integrity depends on their awareness of and attitudes towards the gender-political power game. I carried out a qualitative study to explore the various background biases, interests, and power politics behind the attitudes of Egyptian intellectuals who work against female genital mutilation but tolerate male genital mutilation. Analysis of the medical doctors’ responses provided insight into the role that is played by the contemporary Egyptian medical institution in the issue of genital integrity. Analysis of the responses of all men and women respondents revealed the underlying gender power politics of male genital mutilation as it is practiced today in Egypt, which is the same basis of female genital mutilation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77:291–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cold CJ, Taylor J. The prepuce. BJU Int 1999;83:34–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldman R. Circumcision: the Hidden Trauma. Boston: Vanguard Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

el Salam Mohamed, S.A. (2001). Attitudes of Egyptian Intellectuals Towards Genital Integrity for All. In: Denniston, G.C., Hodges, F.M., Milos, M.F. (eds) Understanding Circumcision. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3375-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3351-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics