Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assaulted and Mutilated

A Personal Account of Circumcision Trauma

  • Chapter
Understanding Circumcision

Abstract

The excessive removal of skin and mucosa is one of the most common complications of neonatal circumcision, yet the true frequency of this complication and its adverse effects on physical and psychological development has not been adequately documented. A personal account is presented of the lifelong trauma associated with a routine neonatal circumcision in which almost all penile shaft skin was removed in addition to the preputial skin and mucosa. The trauma of this iatrogenic injury exerted a negative effect on physical and psychological development, including sexuality, perceived place in society, and career. Reconstructive surgery to resolve the physical injury yielded disappointing results. Partial resolution of the psychological trauma has been achieved through a combination of ongoing counseling, successful litigation, and an emphasis by the victim on public education in regard to the detrimental effects of routine neonatal circumcision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Szabo R, Short RV. How does male circumcision protect against HIV infection? BMJ 2000;320(7249): 1592–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanawati N, Hassan A. The Teti Cemetery at Saqqara. vol. II. The Tomb of Ankhmahor. The Australian Centre for Egyptology: Reports 9. Warminster: Aris & Phillips Ltd. 1997. pp. 49–50.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey E. Circumcision in ancient Egypt. The Bulletin of the Australian Centre for Egyptology. 1996; 7:15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roth AM. Egyptian Phyles in the Old Kingdom: The Evolution of a System of Social Organization. Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago; 1991. pp. 62–75.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Spiegelman M. The circumcision scene in the tomb of Ankhmahor: the first record of emergency surgery. The Bulletin of the Australian Centre for Egyptology 1997;8:91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See the discussion in: Hodges FM. The ideal prepuce in ancient Greece and Rome: male genital aesthetics and their relation to lipodermos, circumcision, foreskin restoration, and the kynodesmē. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 2001;75:375–405.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Duckett JW. The neonatal circumcision debate. In: King LR, editor. Urologic Surgery in Neonates & Young Infants. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1988. pp. 291–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Broecker BH. Circumcision. In: Glen JE, Graham SD, Boyce WH, Turner-Warnick R, Brendler CB, et al., editors. Urologic Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1991. pp. 841–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clark P. On the penis. In: Operations in Urology. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1985. pp. 107–112. [here, p. 111.]

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan GW. Complications of circumcision. Urol Clin North Am 1983;10(3):543–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Redman JF. Rare penile anomalies presenting with complication of circumcision. Urology 1988;32(2):130–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wiswell TE, Geschke DW. Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcised boys. Pediatrics 1989;83(6):1011–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Berman W. Letter: Urinary retention due to ritual circumcision. Pediatrics 1975;56(4):621.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bennett HJ, Weissman M. Circumcisions: knowledge isn’t enough. Pediatrics 1981;68(5):750.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ritchey ML, Bloom DA. Re: Skin bridge-a complication of paediatric circumcision. Br J Urol 1991;68(3):331.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Talarico RD, Jasaitis JE. Concealed penis: a complication of neonatal circumcision. J Urol 1973;110(6):732–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sussman SJ, Schiller RP, Shashikumar VL. Fournier’s syndrome. Report of three cases and review of the literature. Am J Dis Child 1978;132(12):1189–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Menahem S. Complications arising from ritual circumcision: pathogenesis and possible prevention. Isr J Med Sci 1981;17(1):45–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaplan GW. Circumcision — an overview. Curr Probl Pediatr 1977;7(5):1–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaplan GW. Circumcision — an overview. Curr Probl Pediatr 1977;7(5):1–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lackey JT, Mannion RA, Kerr JE. Urethral fistula following circumcision. Jama 1968;206(10):2318.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Limaye RD, Hancock RA. Penile urethral fistula as a complication of circumcision. J Pediatr 1968;72(1):105–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Redman JF. Rare penile anomalies presenting with complication of circumcision. Urology 1988;32(2):130–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McGowan AJ. A complication of circumcision. JAMA 1969;207(11):2104–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vyas PR, Roth DR, Perlmutter AD. Experience with free grafts in urethral reconstruction. J Urol 1987;137(3):471–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hanash KA. Plastic reconstruction of partially amputated penis at circumcision. Urology 1981;18(3):291–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Palmer JM, Link D. Impotence following anesthesia for elective circumcision. JAMA 1979;241(24):2635–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ball JR, Grounds AD. Head injury, hypopituitarism and paranoid psychosis: Circumcision for the “Singapore virus”. Med J Aust 1974;2(11):403–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Flaherty JA. Circumcision and schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 1980;41(3):96–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosefsky JB. Glans necrosis as a complication of circumcision. Pediatrics 1967;39(5):774–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sterenberg N, Golan J, Ben-Hur N. Necrosis of the glans penis following neonatal circumcision. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;68(2):237–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. St Margaret’s Hospital for Women (Sydney) vs McKibben. Hearing before the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Court of Appeal. BC8701368. 14 May 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gearhart JP, Rock JA. Total ablation of the penis after circumcision with electrocautery: a method of management and long-term followup. J Urol 1989;142(3):799–801.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hanash KA. Plastic reconstruction of partially amputated penis at circumcision. Urology 1981;18(3):291–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Izzidien AY. Successful replantation of a traumatically amputated penis in a neonate. J Pediatr Surg 1981;16(2):202–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gairdner DM. The fate of the foreskin: A study of circumcision. BMJ 1949;2:1433–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gee WF, Ansell JS. Neonatal circumcision: a ten-year overview: with comparison of the Gomco clamp and the Plastibell device. Pediatrics 1976;58(6):824–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gearhart JP, Rock JA. Total ablation of the penis after circumcision with electrocautery: a method of management and long-term followup. J Urol 1989;142(3):799–801.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Money J. Ablatio penis: normal male infant sex-reassigned as a girl. Arch Sex Behav 1975;4(1):65–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Diamond M, Sigmundson K. Sex Reassignment at Birth: Long-term Review and Clinical Implications. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997;151(3):298–304.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Patel H. The problem of routine circumcision. Can Med Assoc J 1966;95(11):576–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Gee WF, Ansell JS. Neonatal circumcision: a ten-year overview: with comparison of the Gomco clamp and the Plastibell device. Pediatrics 1976;58(6):824–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Clark P. On the penis. In: Operations in Urology. New York. Churchill Livingstone; 1985. pp. 107–112. [here, p. 111.]

    Google Scholar 

  44. Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77(2):291–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Jordan GH. Grafts and flaps in urology. In: Glen JE, Graham SD, Boyce WH, Turner-Warnick R, Brendler CB, et al., editors. Urologic Surgery. Philadelphia. Lippincott; 1991. pp. 1085–97.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jordan GH, Schlossberg SM, Devine CJ. Surgery of the penis and urethra. In: Walsh PC, Retick AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ. Campbell’s Urology, 4 vols., 7th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1998. vol. 2. pp. 3316–33.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jordan GH, Schlossberg SM, Devine CJ. Surgery of the penis and urethra. In: Walsh PC, Retick AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ. Campbell’s Urology, 4 vols., 7th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1998. vol. 2. pp. 3316–33.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hermans MH. Duoderm E in the treatment of donor sites: a report. Annals of the MBC 1990;3(3):166–9. [September 1990]

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stanley D. Shane’s circumcision nightmare: I wish I’d never been born. Woman’s Day (Sydney, Australia), (1 May 2000): pp. 24–5.

    Google Scholar 

  50. A report to the Attorney-General prepared by the Family Law Council. Sterilisation and Other Medical Procedures on Children. Commonwealth of Australia 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77(2):291–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Siegel-Itzkovich J. Baby’s penis reattached after botched circumcision. BMJ 2000;321(7260):529. [2 September 2000]

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Siegel-Itzkovich J. Israel’s health ministry ends circumcisers’ monopoly. BMJ 2001;322(7277):10. [6 January 2001]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Weiss GN, Weiss EB. A perspective on controversies over neonatal circumcision. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1994;33(12):726–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Taddio A, Pollock N, Gilbert-MacLeond C, Ohlsson K, et al. Combined analgesia and local anesthesia to minimize pain during circumcision. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154(6):620–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Anand KJ, Hickey PR. Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. N Engl J Med 1987;317(21):1321–9. [19 November 1987]

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Rickwood AM, Kenny SE, Donnell SC. Towards evidence based circumcision of English boys: survey of trends in practice. BMJ 2000;321(7264):792–3. [30 September 2000]

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Australia

    Shane E. Peterson

Authors
  1. Shane E. Peterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

    George C. Denniston

  2. Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

    Frederick Mansfield Hodges

  3. National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers, San Anselmo, California, USA

    Marilyn Fayre Milos

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peterson, S.E. (2001). Assaulted and Mutilated. In: Denniston, G.C., Hodges, F.M., Milos, M.F. (eds) Understanding Circumcision. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3375-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3351-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation