Physical, Sexual, and Psychological Effects of Male Infant Circumcision

A New Preputial Structure
  • Gillian A. Bensley
  • Gregory J. Boyle
Chapter

Abstract

Circumcised and genitally intact men, as well as female and gay partners having sexual experience with both circumcised and intact men, were surveyed in order to investigate the long-term effects of infant circumcision. Both circumcised men and the sexual partners of circumcised men reported a number of adverse physical, sexual, and psychological sequelae. Logistic regression analysis revealed that circumcised men could be reliably classified as having penile scarring, need for use of lubrication when undertaking sexual activity, reluctance to use condoms, progressive decline in sexual sensitivity, as well as unhappiness with and reluctance to think about their circumcision status. Female and gay sexual partners reported that their circumcised partners were more likely to experience reduced sexual sensation as compared with their intact partners, as well as dissatisfaction with their orgasms and a wide range of negative emotions associated with being circumcised. Evidently, there are many adverse physical, sexual and psychological effects from infant circumcision, which need to be acknowledged in any discussions pertaining to informed consent in relation to circumcision surgery.

Keywords

Anal Intercourse Male Circumcision Premature Ejaculation Survey Group Sexual Enjoyment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Maguire P, Parkes CM. Surgery and loss of body parts. BMJ 1998;316:1086–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Denniston GC, Hodges FM, Milos MF, editors. Male and Female Circumcision: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldman R. Circumcision: the hidden trauma. Boston: Vanguard; 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hammond T. Long-term consequences of neonatal circumcision. In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, editors. Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1997. pp. 125–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Menage J. Circumcision and psychological harm; 1998. [cited 1 September 1999]. URL:http://www.norm-uk.co.uk/psycheff.htm Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Menage J. Post-traumatic stress disorder after genital medical procedures. In: Denniston GC, Hodges FM, Milos MF, editors. Male and Female Circumcision: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999. pp. 215–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising!, (2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cold CJ, Taylor JR. The prepuce. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:34–44.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77:291–5, [here, p. 294.]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fleiss Paul M. The case against circumcision. Mothering (Winter 1997): pp. 36–45.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harryman GL. What is lost? [cited 1 September 1999]. URL:http://www.SexuallyMutilatedChild.org/lost.htm Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fleiss Paul M. The case against circumcision. Mothering (Winter 1997): pp. 36–45.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harryman GL. What is lost? [cited 1 September 1999]. URL:http://www.SexuallyMutilatedChild.org/lost.htm Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77:291–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anderson KN, Anderson LE, Glanze WD, editors. Mosby’s Medical, Nursing, and Allied Health Dictionary. Missouri: Mosby Publishers; 1994.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anderson KN, Anderson LE, Glanze WD, editors. Mosby’s Medical, Nursing, and Allied Health Dictionary. Missouri: Mosby Publishers; 1994. p. 1271.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising! (2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fleiss Paul M. The case against circumcision. Mothering (Winter 1997): pp. 36–45.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fleiss PM, Hodges F. Nontherapeutic circumcision should not be performed. Amer Med News 1995;38:16.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising! (2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on sexual enjoyment of female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fleiss PM, Hodges F. Nontherapeutic circumcision should not be performed. Amer Med News 1995;38:16.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising! (2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on sexual enjoyment of female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Money J, Davison J. Adult penile circumcision: erotosexual and cosmetic sequelae. J Sex Res 1983;19:289–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cold CJ, Taylor JR. The prepuce. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:34–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77:291–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hammond T. Long-term consequences of neonatal circumcision. In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, editors. Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1997.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hammond T. Long-term consequences of neonatal circumcision. In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, editors. Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1997.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising! (2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gearhart JP. Complications of pediatric circumcision. In: Marshall FF, editor. Urologic Complications: Medical and Surgical, Adult and Pediatric. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1986. pp. 387–96.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Richters J, Gerofi J, Donovan B. Are condoms the right size(s)? A method for self-measurement of the erect penis. Venereology 1995;8:77–81.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Van Howe RS. Variability in penile appearance and penile findings. BJU 1997;80:776–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Richters J, Gerofi J, Donovan B. Are condoms the right size(s)? A method for self-measurement of the erect penis. Venereology 1995;8:77–81.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising!, (2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hammond T. Long-term consequences of neonatal circumcision. In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, editors. Sexual mutilations: A human tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1997.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Money J, Davison J. Adult penile circumcision: erotosexual and cosmetic sequelae. Journal of Sex Research 1983;19:289–92, [here, p. 291.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising! (2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hammond T. Long-term consequences of neonatal circumcision. In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, editors. Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1997.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Money J, Davison J. Adult penile circumcision: erotosexual and cosmetic sequelae. J Sex Res 1983;19:289–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Money J, Davison J. Adult penile circumcision: erotosexual and cosmetic sequelae. J Sex Res 1983;19:289–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Goldman R. Circumcision: The hidden trauma. Boston: Vanguard Publishers; 1997. p. 40.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Marx JL. Circumcision may protect against the AIDS virus. Science 1989;245:470–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Fleiss PM, Hodges F. Nontherapeutic circumcision should not be performed. Amer Med News 1995;38:16.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Van Howe RS. Circumcision and HIV infection: review of the literature and meta-analysis. Int J STD & AIDS 1999;10:8–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising!(2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ritter T. Say No to Circumcision! Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1992.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77:291–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman MA. Circumcision in the United States: prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practice. JAMA 1997;277:1052–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Immerman RS, Mackey WC. A proposed relationship between circumcision and neural reorganization. J Genet Psychol 1998;159:367–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Immerman RS, Mackey WC. A biocultural analysis of circumcision. Soc Biol 1998;44:265–75.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kandel ER. Cellular mechanisms of learning and the biological basis of individuality. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, editors. Principles of neural science 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier Publishers; 1991. pp. 1009–31.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kaas JK. Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals. Ann Rev Neuroscience 1991;14:137–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Immerman RS, Mackey WC. A proposed relationship between circumcision and neural reorganization. J Genet Psychol 1998;159:367–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hughes GK. Circumcision: another look. Ohio Med 1990;86:92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on sexual enjoyment of female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hughes GK. Circumcision: another look. Ohio Med 1990;86:92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on sexual enjoyment of female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kaas JK. Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals. Ann Rev Neuroscience 1991;14:137–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman MA. Circumcision in the United States: prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practice. JAMA 1997;277:1052–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on sexual enjoyment of female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman MA. Circumcision in the United States: prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practice. JAMA 1997;277:1052–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman MA. Circumcision in the United States: prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practice. JAMA 1997;277:1052–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on sexual enjoyment of female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Money J, Davison J. Adult penile circumcision: erotosexual and cosmetic sequelae. J Sex Res 1983;19:289–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Stinson J. Impotence and adult circumcision. J Natl Med Assoc 1973;65:161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Van Howe RS, Cold CJ. Advantages and disadvantages of neonatal circumcision. JAMA 1997;278:203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on sexual enjoyment of female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human Sexual Response. Boston: Little Brown Publishers; 1966. p. 190.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Goldman R. Psychological impact of circumcision. BJU Int 1999;83, Suppl 1:93–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Cansever G. Psychological effects of circumcision. Br J Med Psychol 1965;38:321–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Schlossberger N, Turne R, Irwin C. Early adolescent knowledge and attitudes about circumcision: methods and implications for research. J Adolesc Health 1992;13:293–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Hammond T. Long-term consequences of neonatal circumcision. In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, editors. Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1997.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising!(2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Goldman R. Circumcision: the hidden trauma. Boston: Vanguard Publishers; 1997.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Anand K, Hickey P. Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1321–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Goldman R. Circumcision: the hidden trauma. Boston: Vanguard Publishers; 1997.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Goldman R. Psychological impact of circumcision. BJU Int 1999;83, Suppl 1:93–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Menage J. Post-traumatic stress disorder after genital medical procedures. In: Denniston GC, Hodges FM, Milos MF, editors. Male and Female Circumcision: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999. pp. 215–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Prescott J. Genital pain vs. genital pleasure: Why the one and not the other? Truth Seeker 1989;July/August:15.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Richards M, Bernal J, Brackbill Y. Early behavioral differences: gender or circumcision? Dev Psychobiol 1976;9:275–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Goldman R. Circumcision: the hidden trauma. Boston: Vanguard Publishers; 1997. p. 112.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Goldman R. Psychological impact of circumcision. BJU Int 1999;83, Suppl 1:93–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Hammond T. Long-term consequences of neonatal circumcision. In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, editors. Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1997.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Menage J. Circumcision and psychological harm; 1998. [cited 1 September 19991 URL:http://www.norm-uk.co.uk/psycheff.htm Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Van Howe RS, Svoboda JS, Dwyer JG, Price CP. Involuntary circumcision: the legal issues. BJU Int 1999;83, Suppl 1:63–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Menage J. Post-traumatic stress disorder after genital medical procedures. In: Denniston GC, Hodges FM, Milos MF, editors. Male and Female Circumcision: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999. pp. 215–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Maguire P, Parkes CM. Surgery and loss of body parts. BMJ 1998;316:1086–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Boyle GJ, Langley PD. Elementary Statistical Methods: For Students of Psychology, Education, Social Sciences. Sydney: Pergamon Publishers; 1989. pp. 164–8.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gillian A. Bensley
    • 1
  • Gregory J. Boyle
    • 1
  1. 1.Bond UniversityGold CoastAustralia

Personalised recommendations