Catholic Schools and Public School Achievement

  • William Sander
Chapter

Abstract

One of the arguments for education vouchers and more private school choice is that more competition from private schools will increase the quality of public education (Friedman 1962; Friedman and Friedman 1981). Recently, New York City’s Mayor Giuliani argued that a private school voucher program in New York City was increasing the quality of public education. His reasoning was that vouchers increased competition between public and private schools (Hartocollis 1997). Similarly, in Chicago there is a recognition that Catholic schools might benefit public schools. For this reason, this past year the head of the public school system in Chicago sent out teams to interview Catholic school principals to learn how to improve public school achievement (The Economist 1998). Apart from recent studies by Hoxby (1994) and Dee (1998) that show that private schools raise the quality of public education, there is very little empirical evidence on this topic. Related studies by Borland and Howsen (1992) and Grosskopf et al. (1998) show that more competition in the public school sector increases the quality of public education.

Keywords

Academic Achievement Public School School District Public Education Student Achievement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, Gary S. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Borland, Melvin V. and Roy M. Howsen. 1992. “Student Academic Achievement and the Degree of Market Concentration in Education”. Economics of Education Review 11(1): 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bound, John, David Jaeger, and Regina Baker. 1995. “Problems with Instrumental Variable Estimation When the Correlation Between Instruments and the Endogenous Variables is Weak.” Journal of the Americana Statistical Association 90 (430):443–450.Google Scholar
  4. Card, David and Krueger Alan B. 1996. “School Resources and Student Outcomes: An Overview of The Literature and New Evidence from North and South Carolina.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(4):31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Card, David. 1992a. “Does School Quality Matter?” Journal of Political Economy 100(1): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Card, David. 1992b. “School Quality and Black-White Relative Earnings: A Direct Assessment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics CVII(1): 151–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Churches and Church Membership in the United States. 1992. Atlanta: Glenmary Research Center.Google Scholar
  8. Dee, Thomas S. 1998. “Competition and the Quality of Public Schools.” Economics of Education Review 17(4):419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Downes, Thomas A. and Shane M. Greenstein. 1996. “Understanding the Supply Decisions of Nonprofits: Modelling the Location of Private Schools.” RAND Journal of Economics 27(2): 365–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. The Economist. 1997. “Answered Prayer.” April 5, p. 27.Google Scholar
  11. Epple, Dennis and Richard E. Romana. 1998. “Competition Between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers, and Peer-Group Effects.” American Economic Review 88(1):33–62.Google Scholar
  12. Evans, William N. and Robert M. Schwab. 1995. “Finishing High School and Starting College: Do Catholic Schools Make a Difference?” Quarterly Journal of Economics CX(4):941–974.Google Scholar
  13. Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, Milton and Rose Friedman. 1979. Free to Choose. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  15. Ferguson, Ronald F. and Helen F. Ladd. 1996. “How and Why Money Matters: An Analysis of Alabama Schools.” In Holding Schools Accountable, ed. Helen F. Ladd, 265–298. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  16. Grosskopf, Shawna, Kathy Hayes, Lori L. Taylor, and William L. Weber. 1998.. “Allocative Inefficiency and School Competition.” unpublished working paper.Google Scholar
  17. Hanushek, Eric A. 1986. “The Economics of Schooling.” Journal of Economic Literature. 24(3):1141–1177.Google Scholar
  18. Hanushek, Eric A. 1996. “School Resources and Student Performance.” In Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success, ed. Gary Burtless, 43–73.Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  19. Hanushek, Eric A. and Lori Taylor. 1990. “Alternative Assessments of the Performance of Schools,” Journal of Human Resources 25(2): 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hartocollis, Anemona. 1997. “Private School Voucher Program to Be Extended.” New York Times, November 26.Google Scholar
  21. Haveman, Robert, Barbara L. Wolfe, and James Spaulding. 1991. “Education Achievement and Childhood Events and Circumstances.” Demography 28(1):133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoxby, Caroline Minter. 1994. “Do Private Schools Provide Competition for Public Schools?” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 4978.Google Scholar
  23. Illinois State Board of Education. 1996. 1996 School Report Card Data. Springfield: Illinois State Board of Education.Google Scholar
  24. Marciniak, Ed. 1998. “Chicago’s Private Elementary and Secondary Schools.” Chicago: Institute of Urban Life, Loyola University.Google Scholar
  25. Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge and Bruce A. Seaman. 1985. “Private Schooling and the Tie-bout Hypothesis.” Public Finance Quarterly 13(3):293–318.Google Scholar
  26. Neal, Derek. 1997. “The Effects of Catholic Secondary Schooling on Educational Attainment.” Journal of Labor Economics 15(1):98–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sander, William. 1996. “Catholic Grade Schools and Academic Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources 31(3):540–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sander, William and Anthony C. Krautmann. 1995. “Catholic Schools, Dropout Rates, and Educational Attainment.” Economic Inquiry 33 (2):217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. United States Department of Commerce. 1992. 1990 Census of Population. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  30. United States Department of Education. 1995. School District Data Book. Arlington, Virginia: The Mesa Group.Google Scholar
  31. United States Department of Education. 1996. Private School Universe Survey, 1993–94. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Sander
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsDePaul UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations