Introduction

  • William Sander
Chapter

Abstract

In When Work Disappears, Harvard sociologist William Julius Wilson (1996) notes that African Americans in Chicago who attended Catholic schools are viewed more favorably by employers than African Americans who attended public schools. Such findings corroborate a widely though not universally-held view that Catholic schools succeed in boosting mobility for children of less-privileged families. Can its success be broadened? Nobel-prize winning economist Robert Fogel (2000) drawing upon the research by Wilson and others suggests that Catholic schools might play a larger role in promoting an egalitarian society, if grants were made available to poor students that could be used in the parochial school sector. Nobel-prize winning economists Milton Friedman (1962) and Gary Becker (1989) also make strong cases for education vouchers and for more competition in primary and secondary education in the United States. From a different perspective, Archbishop of Chicago Francis Cardinal George argues that Catholic “education that is faith-based, that provides values and discipline, that is Jesus-centered, has the potential to transform the world” (Archdiocese of Chicago, 2000b).

Keywords

Church Attendance General Social Survey Catholic School National Opinion Research High School Graduation Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altonji, Joseph, Todd Elder, and Christopher Taber. 2000. “Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools.” Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  2. Archdiocese of Chicago. 2000a. “Lighting the Way to a New Century.”Google Scholar
  3. Archdiocese of Chicago. 2000b. “Shoulder to Shoulder.”Google Scholar
  4. Becker, Gary S. 1989. “What Our Schools Need is a Healthy Dose of Competition.” Business Week, December 18.Google Scholar
  5. Black, S.E. 1999. “Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 577–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bringham, F. 1993. United States Catholic Elementary and Secondary Schools 1992–1993. Washington, D.C.: National Catholic Education Association.Google Scholar
  7. Coleman, James S. and Thomas Hoffer. 1987. Public and Private High Schools. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, James S., Thomas Hoffer, and Sally Kilgore. 1982. High School Achievement. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, William N. and Robert M. Schwab. 1995. “Finishing High School and Starting College: Do Catholic Schools Make a Difference?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110:941–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fogel, Robert William. 2000. The Fourth Great Awakening & The Future of Egalitarianism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Freeman, Richard B. 1986. “Who Escapes? The Relation of Churchgoing and Other Background Factors to the Socioeconomic Performance of Black Male Youths from Inner-City Tracts.” In Richard B. Freeman and Harry J. Holzer, The Black Youth Employment Crisis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Greeley, Andrew. 1982. Catholic High Schools and Minority Students. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  14. Harris, Joseph Claude. 1996. The Cost of Catholic Parishes and Schools. Kansas City: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
  15. Jepsen, Christopher. 2000. “The Private Schooling Market and Its Effects on Student Achievement.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  16. Jeynes, William H. 1999. “The Effects of Religious Commitment on the Academic Achievement of Black and Hispanic Children.” Urban Education. 34: 458–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McEwan, Patrick J. 2000. “The Potential Impact of Large-Scale Voucher Programs.” Occasional Paper No. 2, National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  18. McLellan, Jeffrey A. 2000. “Rise, Fall, and Reasons Why: U.S. Catholic Elementary Education, 1940–1995.” In James Youniss and John J. Convey (editors), Catholic Schools at the Crossroads. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  19. Neal, Derek. 1997. “The Effects of Catholic Secondary Schooling on Educational Attainment.” Journal of Labor Economics 15: 98–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. National Opinion Research Center, “General Social Survey: 1972–1998.” Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  21. National Catholic Educational Association. 1999. United States Catholic Elementary and Secondary Schools 1998–1999. Washington, D.C.: National Catholic Educational Association.Google Scholar
  22. Riordan, Cornelius. 2000. “Trends in Student Demography in Catholic Secondary Schools, 1972–1992.” In Youniss and Convey, op. cit. Google Scholar
  23. Sander, William and Anthony C. Krautmann. 1995. “Catholic Schools, Dropout Rates, and Educational Attainment.” Economic Inquiry 33: 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sander, William. Forthcoming. “Chicago Public Schools and Student Achievement.” Urban Education.Google Scholar
  25. United States Department of Commerce. 1983. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  26. United States Department of Commerce. 1999. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  27. United States Department of Education. 1986. High School and Beyond 1980 Sophomore Cohort Third Follow-Up. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, William Julius. 1996. When Work Disappears. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Sander
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsDePaul UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations