Flight to Quality: Investor Risk Tolerance and the Spread of Emerging Market Crises

  • Barry Eichengreen
  • Galina Hale
  • Ashoka Mody

Abstract

The financial crises of the 1990s have raised new concerns about the operation of international financial markets. Prominent among these are worries about sharp changes in investor sentiment and their cross-border repercussions. The Mexican crisis dramatically altered investor sentiment toward emerging markets and echoed through Latin America, showing up in Argentina as the Tequila Effect. The spillover from the Thai crisis was limited initially to the Asian Tigers, but by the end of 1997 a wide variety of other developing countries were affected to some degree. In addition, Russia’s default in the summer of 1998, in conjunction with the all-but-failure of Long-Term Capital Management, precipitated a flight to quality with a strong negative impact on market sentiment regarding the entire population of emerging-market borrowers.

Keywords

Bond Market Export Growth Investor Sentiment International Financial Statistics Inverse Mill Ratio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Calvo, Guillermo, Leonardo Leiderman, and Carmen Reinhart (1996). “Inflows of Capital to Developing Countries in the 1990s.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10: 12–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cline, William, and K. Barnes. (1997). “Spreads and Risk in Emerging Market Lending.” Institute of International Finance Research Paper no. 97–1.Google Scholar
  3. Corsetti, Giancarlo, and T.N. Srinivasan (1999). “The Asian Financial Crisis and Proposals for Reform of the International Financial Architecture.” Mimeo, Yale University.Google Scholar
  4. Diamond, Douglas (1997). “Liquidity, Bank and Markets.” Journal of Political Economy, 105: 928–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eichengreen, Barry, and Ashoka Mody (1998b). “Interest Rates in the North and Capital Flows to the South: Is There a Missing Link?” International Finance, 1: 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eichengreen, Barry, and Ashoka Mody (2000). “Would Collective Action Clauses Raise Borrowing Costs?” NBER Working Paper no. 7458.Google Scholar
  7. Eichengreen, Barry, and Andrew Rose (1999). “Contagious Currency Crises: Channels of Conveyance.” In Changes in Exchange Rates in Rapidly Developing Countries, Takatoshi Ito and Anne Krueger, eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Flannery, Mark (1986). “Asymmetric Information and Risky Debt Maturity Choice.” Journal of Finance, 41 (1); 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glick, Reuven, and Andrew Rose (1998). “Contagion and Trade: Why are Currency Crises Regional?” NBER Working Paper no. 6806.Google Scholar
  10. Goldstein, Morris (1998). The Asian Financial Crisis. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  11. Heckman, James (1979). “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica, 47: 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rodrik, Dani, and Andrés Velasco (1999). “Short Term Capital Flows.” Mimeo, Harvard University and New York University.Google Scholar
  13. Stohs, Mark, and David Mauer (1996). “The Determinants of Corporate Debt Maturity Structure.” Journal of Business, 69: 279–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barry Eichengreen
    • 1
  • Galina Hale
    • 1
  • Ashoka Mody
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.The World BankUSA

Personalised recommendations